Download file to see previous pages...
What impressed me most about the film is the way it shows the story from both the French and the FLN points of view. It shows unspeakable acts of violence and brutality committed by both sides, not portraying any bias towards any side. For example, in the early parts of the film, an FLN supporter is beheaded in prison. Furthermore, Ali la Pointe later kills the brothel owner who helped to bring him up because he refused to declare loyalty for the FLN. Therefore, the film tells both sides of the story despite the fact that only one side of the previous warring factions, the post-colonial Algerian government, was involved in its production. It demonstrates a high degree of impartiality and accuracy of historical events.
Another brilliant aspect of The Battle of Algiers is its excellent examination of guerilla warfare tactics and strategies. For instance, early on in the film, the FLN takes advantage of the tendency by French soldiers at checkpoints not to search pretty women. They use women dressed in western attire to smuggle weapons in and out of the Casbah. Another impressive guerilla tactic portrayed by the film is the strategy used by the FLN to maintain secrecy of its membership and operations. Each recruited cell leader recruits two people. Thus, he only knows the identities of the person who recruited him and the two others he recruited, and no one else in the movement. Consequently, if captured by French forces, an FLN member cannot reveal much since he knows the identities of only three people in the entire movement.
The film also sheds light on the political philosophy underlying national liberation, particularly from an Arab perspective. As a result, it enabled me to understand the motivation behind the Arab spring revolutions that recently took place in several Arab countries in North Africa and the Middle East. For instance, late on in the film Pointe asks the FLN leader why they are resorting to general strikes instead of continuing with
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The film makers are Pamela Yates, Paco de Onis, and Peter Kinoy. It shows an attempt to protect the fundamental rights of a human being by applying the rule of law by international yardsticks. This case is being tried at the International Criminal Court, the permanent court to try crimes against humanity, be they war crimes or genocides.
Especially, the Black Panthers and other extreme leftist groups greeted considered the film as a guide to urban revolution. It was banned in France for many years because of the vivid descriptions of riots, torture and terrorism, which showed its former rulers in a negative manner.
The movie begins with the citizens of New York rioting in 1776. Shortly thereafter the protagonist-Tom Dobbs, a fur trapper played by Al Pacino, is reluctantly pulled into the conflict, which leads to the enlistment of both himself and his son in the Continental Army.
As in the film, we see there is a bias and racism arising out of French nationalism (those born of French heritage), and their country’s Muslim immigrants and French-born Muslim citizens; the first and second generation descendants of
Rikichi found seven samurai mercenaries who were ready to help the village; they included Kambei, Kikuchiyo, Katsushiro, Kyuzo, Shichiroji, Heihachi, and Gorobei. The mercenaries taught the villagers some fighting skills in
The film ends in a climactic physical battle between the husband (played by Billy Campbell) and wife that leads to the demise of one of them.
Of all the scenes in this movie, it has to be the final battle scene between the
Back at Fort Benning, Mrs. Moore demonstrated her leadership ability by taking control of delivering sad news and consoling the widows of some of the soldiers that loss their lives during the war. She in fact encouraged them by telling them that their suffering could not
There were two ideas in this episode about how to control the economy of the society. The first thought was that the government should take control of the commanding heights of the economy while an opposing view was the idea that if the market force is in control the outcome will better economy for the world.
Gillo Pontecorvo’s is a famous director, the initial prints of the movie were accessible only as washed-out prints and the translation was also poor as the subtitles were white on white background and the audience were finding it difficult to read. However,
Eventually, the Leonidas and his group were wiped out by the huge Persian army which was better armed. There film has several aspects of leadership. Leonidas must have been aware that there was no way his 300 men were going to subdue a Persian army of 300000 men.
4 Pages(1000 words)Movie Review
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Movie Review on topic The Battle of Algiers for FREE!