Modern Artists Joan Miro and Marcel Duchamp - Essay Example

? Modern Art Museum Paper Part Marcel Duchamp was an American born in the year 1887 and died in 1968. He wasa renowned artist with varied fundamental designs in his career as an artist. He majored on synchronized artwork that appeared like machines such as satellites and magazines. Personally, I am intrigued one of his works that bears major inspirational essence commonly known a Rotary Demisphere completed in 1925. My choice for this piece of art is due to its unique material incorporated with other varied medium to come up with a well-thought image. Besides, drawings and paintings that comprise majority of artworks seen in the museum, Marcel’s artwork stands out as an artistic handy work with varied materials that make it real and fascinating to look at thereby inducing immense attention from viewers. This is because the artwork comprises of varied incorporated material not necessarily purchased by procured locally probably collecting worn out pieces of metals and other materials including threads. At a first glance, one cannot tell if the materials used entail ready available resources like copper collar, metal stand and a pulley. I also got fascinated by the work since it shows how thought major level of creativity. This is because for one to come up with a final product that encompasses fitting a painted papier- mache demisphere on velvet covered disk requires patience as well as outstanding creativity. Other intriguing encompasses the artiste’s blending of harmonious colors within the whole piece of work, which are black, white and brown. Hence, making the object appear integrated also with its settings and other parts such that it is not contrasting its varied parts together with shadow cast just close to it. This brings out the impact of visibility, which makes it exceptional compared to other pieces of work that may resemble it. Mainly, this is an artistic technique commonly associated with exceptional artists in their quest to create attention despite their works’ settings or placement in a museum as in Marcel’s artwork. Joan Miro was one of the best artists who ever lived in Spain whose specialization encompassed major and exceptional artworks ranging from drawing to painting. He was born in 1893 and died in 1983 after reaching great heights in his career as an artist. Based on this piece of work (completed in 1936) depicting perching parrot, I guess the artist’s interest encompassed making his works resemble mostly nature and other wild creatures though in an illogical manner. This is evident in the way he is capable of incorporating wild features in his work and other things like a shoe as well as hat whose original settings as expected by mere audience does not resemble what he has made through this artwork. However, the artwork is extremely intriguing, which was the reason of choosing it. Similar to Marcel, the artists has also embraced use of harmonious though having lighter shading to align adequately with the artwork settings and somehow wildly nature. The latter is evident in the way the perched by the parrot seems all through having almost close colors thus no sharp contrasting. In addition, Miro’s work resembles that of his counterpart Marcel through assembly of varied aspects to create a unique and an identifiable object. In comparison with Marcel’s artwork, Miro seemed to have gone further into utilizing refined aspects to come up with this artwork, which are shoe, art and others like different material for engraving the map, which is diverse from the brown one protruding from the base. The reason behind choosing this artwork was due to the artist’s fascinating way of incorporating nature with other aspects to make the viewer deem he or she is in the wild. This is via Joan merging varied materials to come up with appears like a tree hoisting a bird in order to bring out the hidden fascination in nature and the wild. Thesis: Marcel and Joan despite their respective artworks differing in the manner of materials incorporated in them, they used one and unique technique in bringing out specific expressions, which was due to their common Surrealism movement, that they shared. Part 2 Over-all compositions Despite these two artworks differing based on materials that comprise them, their respective artists have utilized same technique, which incorporating varied components to come up with an extremely intriguing object. Miro in his artwork already made stuffed parrot, which he made to perch on wood and hanging cork ball just below where the wood’s base. There is also a suspended doll’s paper shoe in the hollow space made in the framed wood, which acts as the main link between the base an upper parts. Other visible aspects include celluloid fish and engraved map, which draws the attention of the viewer in quest to ascertain exactly its implication. Conversely, Marcel incorporates metal stand, pulley, velvet-covered disk, dome and colored papier-mache in quest to bring the intriquing aspect of the artwork. In addition, these two artists have tried smoothening surfaces of respective objects in creating smooth surfaces. Formal analysis Figure 1: Marcel Duchamp artwork made in 1925 as a gift to Mrs. William Sisler and Edwar James of 1970. Outstanding elements in this artwork embrace line, light, color, depth and texture. Line is evident in the way the artist has utilized it to give outline of the varied components comprising the entire object (Prince, 2008). This is evident from lines connecting pulley and the central object besides outline boundaries of each item in the image ranging from base to Dome’s stand and how the pulley anchor appears. Marcel has skillfully utilized light with the intention of illuminating both depth and texture of components in the entire artwork. For instance, texture in this case is evident on the dome’s surface and main core components base, which are shining due to illumination emanating from 700 directions (Prince, 2008). In addition, colors used in the image do not differ with numerous engineering machines, which are dark grey, dull brown, white for refined species and black. However, their selections in this image is to depict heightened incorporation and harmony, hence calm colors with immense illumination directed at the center and fading towards the back for creation of more depth. Figure 2: Joan Miro artwork made in 1936. In this image, line depicts the outline of varied components starting base where the artwork rests toward the topmost parts that comprise the perching bird. However, there is no much detailing of using lines in ascertaining diverse inside parts except in the engraved map. Other parts in quest to show demarcations the artist has immensely used colors, for instance, from base through the map area to other parts upwards that comprise dark brown wood and velvet perching bird. Illumination of light in this artwork is scanty though it creates depth by use of the faded thrown shadow behind it (Abbott & Hancock 20013). Similarities The most outstanding aspects in both artworks include use of illumination and choice of colors. Colors in both cases do not contrast with the artworks’ placements, hence creating harmony not only with backgrounds but also with other components comprising them (Abbott & Hancock 20013). Illumination though differing in their intensity is in such a way they do not cast long shadows that will crating more congestion in the artworks’ respective settings, hence stand out clearly. Differing elements The two images differ in varying intensities of illumination whereby in figure one it is more compared to that of Miro’s artwork. Probably in the first is to bring the aspect of texture, which is nonexistent in the second thereby making it appear somehow dull (Prince, 2008). There is also use of line, which is more evident in the first but in the second it is only evident in creating outlines of the objects except in engraved map. Communication of mood In both artworks, respective artists have utilized both color and illumination or light to communicate their mood. However, their moods differ significantly whereby Miro’s image depict dull atmosphere contrary to that of Marcel’s. In Marcel’s image depicts a bright and calm mood due to intensity of light as it guides slowly through each part of the entire artwork. Miro’s dull moon emanates from fading shadow and lack adequate light to illuminate varied aspect of the entire artwork. Artistic contexts/movements Both Miro and Marcel descended from the same artistic movement/context, which was Surrealism (Cabanne, 2009). The movement encompassed releasing images from the mind and putting them in one’s artwork without imposing any limitations. The origin of movement was in 1920s, which later turned out to be both a political and intellectual movement due to its free mode of expression (Witcombe, n.d). Conclusion Despite the relayed images differing based on mood and intensities of light, they all descend from the same artistic movement, which is Surrealism (Brodskai?a?, 2012). The movement encompassed putting in reality product of subconscious imaginations without imposition of varied impositions, which artists had to adhere to once producing the respective works. Hence, prompting both works of Miro and Marcel having bearing same technique despite incorporating varied components to bring out their implications (Witcombe, n.d). References Abbott, L. D., & Hancock, G. S. (2013). Classic concepts and new directions: Exploring 125 years of GSA discoveries in the Rocky Mountain Region. Brodskai?a?, N. V. (2012). Surrealism: Genesis of a revolution. New York: Parkstone International. Cabanne, P. (2009). Dialogues With Marcel Duchamp. Cambridge, MA, Da Capo Press. Prince, E. S. (2008). Art is fundamental: Teaching the elements and principles of art in elementary school. Chicago, Ill: Zephyr Press. Surrealism. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. Retrieved on 24Th November 2013 from Witcombe, C. (n.d). 20th-Century Art. Retrieved on 24Th November 2013 Read More