Flex Ones Rights: A Rhetorical Analysis of Ten Rules for Dealing with Police - Essay Example

The lecture was by the lawyer, who gathered people together and wanted to persuade them to “make the law work for them”. Music accompaniment we heard from the very beginning of this documentary or short movie. We can see the building of the court and the atmosphere is rather specific. As a rule, people go to the courts to solve their current problems and to find decisions of justice in their cases. At first, there are used tactics of ethos and proclamations of the lawyer look like lectures of the prophet!

When an African American man starts talking about the situation of his experience of the unjust attitude of the police, we look at the night city and see a tired and depressed young man, who got out of the car by the policeman and told that he was arrested because he showed a “bad attitude” towards him. This situation shows the cruel attention of the policeman to a citizen. Unjust and unfair strategies of the policeman cannot be correlated with the realities of the law. The lawyer explains strategies for dealing with the police.

First, be calm and cool. The modes of behavior are described step by step. For example, the lawyer said that there was a need to be calm and to have a positive language of the body. Common sense should be the major trigger of communication with the policeman. His claims are supported by video clips, which show the way attitude of the other lice officers is changed, when a suspect follows the directions of the lawyer. In the following part of text we have an opportunity to refer to Fourth and Fifth Athe Amendments of the Constitution.

In accordance with that protection of one’s rights is on behalf of an individual. It is better to pull over immediately, put one’s hands on the wheel and it will be unsuspicious for the policeman. At the same time, there is a right to refuse searches. It is better to follow the directions of the police and, of course, don’t get tricked! It is appropriate to ask direct questions to the police officers and listen to their comments with understanding. In any case, police searches should be in consent with a car owner.

Suspicious things should be removed from the car. For example, some tinned cans, empty bags etc can remind police of some crimes. A suspect should not resist police officers. Nevertheless, a representative from the community of color can have special problems with the police, because of the color of his skin. Very often people with a “suspicious appearance” start running, when they see the police. It is impossible to behave in such a way. A physical resistaPhysical worst mode of behavior and one should never touch a cop!

This rule is very important because the police officer can feel danger for his life. In that case, he can arrest and hurt a suspect. There is no law to show one’s ID because there is no exact law about that. There is a key phrase: “Are you detaining me or am I free to go?” Anyway, proving the police’s misconduct is a very difficult case. Reports on the misconduct of the police should be specific. One should protect one’s life and “flex one’s rights”. When policemen are knocking at the door and want to know something, this can violate your rights too.

There is an option not to let policemen in. A search order is a must! “I cannot let you in without a warrant”- this is a key phrase and every citizen has a right to keep police officers behind the door. These 4 pieces about flexing our rights are very impressing and, suimpressiveare very helpful for our lives too. The lawyer had an opportunity to warn people about the unjust practices of the police officers. He had a diverse audience. People in the court were of different age, color, and gender.

Nevertheless, he used tactics of ethos and tried to answer all questions assuredly and show his tolerance to many other people. He persuaded people into a necessity to show a tolerant and loyal attitude towards the policemen, but he showed examples of evident violations of one’s rights on the example of the stories told by the audience. His strategies were effective and comprehensible to the people. Anyway, he used the tactics of replica reiterations and showed people how it is right to behave and communicate with the police.