The Creation of Descriptive Technologies - Essay Example

INNОVАTIОN: Disruptive Technologies Name of Student Institution affiliation Table of Contents 1.0. Introduction 2 2.0. Impact of disruptive technologies on future work and jobs 4 2.1. The most disruptive technological 4 2.2. How disruptive technology impact on the future work and jobs 5 3.0. Enablers and barriers to progress for disruptive technologies in organization 6 3.1. Introduction to Organization using advanced robots 6 6 3.2. Embrace of advanced robots 7 3.3. Enablers and barriers 7 4.0. Conclusion 8 References 10 5.0. APPENDICES 11 INNОVАTIОN 1.0. Introduction The creation of Descriptive technologies is vital as it helps lessen work done by human beings by making it more effective and improving productivity in workforce. However, descriptive technologies also pose some negative impact to individuals’ future jobs , once preferred they lead to massive layoffs in most organizations (Hanif, Masood, & Azhar, (2013). Advanced Robots are machines which are designed to execute tasks with speed and precision that is similar that of human beings. However, advanced robots tend to be much cheaper compared to actual human workforce since advanced robots do not require any wage payment (Wu et al., 2010). This therefore leads to most organizations and employers both in Australia and globally to prefer advanced robots as opposed to human workforce. Employees are therefore at a high risk of losing their job positions to robots which are tested and scientifically proven to be relatively more productive and cheaper compared to the human workforce (Sood & Tellis, 2011). Hence most organizations have Automated workforces which means that they entirely depende on robots. This reports analyses the impact of advanced robots as a disruptive technology on the future of work and appraises the enablers and barriers to progress for advanced robots in two highlighted organizations; Rethink Robotics and Automated Solution in Australia. Firstly the report covers the impact of advance robots on the future of work and jobs. Secondly it will highlights the enablers and barriers to progress for advanced robots in organizations. Finally, it will cover the conclusion where all the main points will be summarized and the main these and trends on advanced robots will as well be mentioned. 2.0. Impact of disruptive technologies on future work and jobs 2.1. The most disruptive technological I consider advanced robots the most disruptive technological innovation identified by Mckinsey due to the increasingly growing potential of artificial intelligence which advanced robots has the ability to present (Kohlbacher & Hang, 2011). Moreover, I consider advanced robots as the most descriptive innovations as illustrated by Mckinsey due to the growing habit of organizations embracing advanced robots. Thus, some of the created advanced robotic such as the driverless car by Google, Baxter by Rethink Robotics and Watson by IBM shows the efforts of organizations in embracing advanced robots (Tani, 2014). Additionally, some advanced robots already in place such as the automated check-in kiosks in the Airports , auto piloting in aircrafts and passport- control processes in airports which use barcodes in scanning and are some of the example that have led to my consideration of advanced robots as the most disruptive technological innovation identified by Mckinsey. Mckinsey emphasizes that advanced robots are currently playing an increasingly role in everyday life. Further, they points out that the potential effect of advanced robots on the workplaces has led to it becoming a major issue of study and research. Mckinsey as well claims that this has led to a guessing game on whether the human workforce will in the long end be replaced by advanced robots or not (Nagamachi, 2013). Mckinsey also argues that automated workforce is likely to affect a portion of almost all jobs to some degree depending with the type of work. They blame this to the fact that advanced technology as a part of automated workforce goes beyond the routine manufacturing job activities, rather it also comes with some technical feasibilities as well as ability to transform sectors for instance, finance and health. Moreover, these advanced robots as a form of automated workforce also involves a substantial share of knowledge work (Chishakwe & Smith, 2012). 2.2. How disruptive technology impact on the future work and jobs Recent research shows that advanced robots will permeate a wide segment of the daily lives of human beings in the future. Thus, most of the implications of advanced robots is seen to fall in a wider range of industries such as customer service, health care, home maintenance and transport and logistics (Daneshi, 2010). Besides, experts claim that advanced technology is likely to change the nature of work by promising a significantly higher productivity potential compared to that of the human beings. Further, these experts argue that advanced robots also promise to give a slightly higher creative potential compared to that of the human workforce (Hanif, Masood & Azhar, 2013). A clear indication that advanced robots can easily dispense human workforce since they promise a significantly higher production potential as well as a significantly higher level of creativity than that of the human workforce (Hirose, 2011). On the other hand, the experts also state that automated workforce is not as vulnerable as human workforce in the manner that, in human workforce the amount of work given to an individual should first be measured to ensure that they can confidently handle it without much restraints and they are also given quality time for rest (Chishakwe & Smith, 2012). However, for the case of automated workforce, the amount of work is not measured or limited at all. Advanced robots can carry out any given amount of work and they do not require time to rest as it in the case in human workforce. Experts therefore, tend to side with the possibility of automated workforce in form of advanced robots having a significantly negative impact in the future of work and jobs by dispensing human workforce since they have proven to be more economically viable compared to the human workforce that is majorly being used currently (Walker, Damanpour & Devece 2010). 3.0. Enablers and barriers to progress for disruptive technologies in organization 3.1. Introduction to Organization using advanced robots Automated Solutions, is an Australian based company that deals with engineering, designing and integration of automated solutions which are flexible for the sealing and painting market in Australia. The Company was founded in the year 2002 and it headquarters are located in Northers Adelaide where it has a 250 m2 warehouse complex and office. This particular facility is the hub of the company’s industrial designers, project management team and engineers (Kamide, Kawabe, Shigemi, & Arai, 2014). The company has embraced advanced robots in their workforce through ROBCAD or ROBOGUIDE which are the digital manufacturing process for robotic work-cells which ensure the provision of a concurrent engineering platform in order to calculate the cycle times. The other company that has embraced advanced robots I their workforce is Rethink Robotics. This is a company that was founded by Rodney Brooks in the early 2000 and it is located in the United States Of America; Boston, Massachusetts (Tani, 2014). The main aim for the company is to come up with new type of automation to manufacturers which are safe, flexible and which is quicker in the context of one job to another (Wu et al., 2010). This aim of this company was finally attained in the year 2012 through the introduction of Baxter® which was an easily deployed and cost effective automated solution. 3.2. Embrace of advanced robots Automated solution has reported to have increased their profit margin by 12% in a spun of two years and their production levels have as well increased. Evidently, this organization seems to have greatly benefited from these advanced robots since performance metrics also showcase a significant improvement in the company’s performance enabling it to be an industry leader in automated solution for sealing and painting in Australia (Mizuta, 2014). A clear indication of how advanced robots have had a huge impact in the company. Rethink Robotic share price has as well grown significantly after the company’s recent creation of Baxter® an easily deployable solution that is also cost effective and Swayer TM which is a small robot that is designed for high precision tasks. The company has been ranked as the top fifteen companies globally that have greatly embraced advanced robotics in its production and operations. The company’s sales have also increased by 57 percent which is an indication of the company’s development (Sood &Tellis, 2011). 3.3. Enablers and barriers One enabler of the progress towards advanced robots in Automated Solution Company is the company’s embrace for technology which has fostered research and application of the advanced robots in the organization workforce (Nagamachi, 2013). For Rethink Robotics the company’s innovation abilities has led to the application of advanced robots in the company. Another, enabler of the progress towards advanced robots in Automated Solution is the company’s incorporation of innovation. This has led to the organization employees to be keen to try an come up with innovation to increase the production level of the company as well as the livelihood of the workers (DaSilva, Trkman, Desouza & Lindič, 2013). On the other hand in Rethink Robotics the company culture is built on promotion of the innovative spirit. This has enabled the company to come up with allot of innovations which could be attributed to lead to the creation of Baxter® and Swayer TM. One barrier that has burred Automated Solution from embracing advanced robots is the fear and perception that most of the organization’s workforce would lose their work position to these advanced robots (Hanif, Masood & Azhar, 2013). This has therefore deterred individuals from putting much effort in the innovation and creation of advanced robots. On the other hand, Rethink Robotics has experienced some barriers in the company’s efforts to the creation of advanced robots; this is blamed on fear and perception among the organization employees who fear losing their job positions to an automated workforce. (Walker, Damanpour & Devece, 2010). 4.0. Conclusion In conclusion, it is evident that advanced technology poses some great impact on the organization workforce who fear to lose job positions to the advanced robots. Embrace of technology and innovative spirits are the main enablers for advanced technology. On the other hand, fear for losing jobs to advanced robots is also pointed out as a barrier for advanced robots. One trend in advanced robots is commercial investment where the commercial sector has invested in robotics. In this case, some multinational commercial companies such as Google and Amazon have invested in some robotic companies by buying them. With Amazon Company buying Kiva systems and Google funding the robotic application of the first driverless car. The other trend in advanced robots is the emergence of new international players. In this case, advanced robotics was earlier seemingly centered on Japan, the US and a few European countries. However, now this field has expanded and other international players such as china have now ventured into this it. References Chishakwe, D. B., & Smith, W. (2012). An analysis of the impact of disruptive technology on the success of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in a developing nation. A case of King Williams Town, South Africa. African Journal of Business Management, 6(36), 10050. http://search.proquest.com/openview/76cbf35db59f746a4fcb00f1d05dd5e9/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=816394 DaSilva, C. M., Trkman, P., Desouza, K., & Lindič, J. (2013). Disruptive technologies: a business model perspective on cloud computing. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(10), 1161-1173. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09537325.2013.843661 Hanif, R., Masood, A., & Azhar, S. M. (2013). Adoption Barriers for Disruptive Technology-B. Framework. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2242203 Hirose, S. (2011). A dispute over robots. Robots of the future. Advanced Robotics, 6(2), 231-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156855392x00060 Kamide, H., Kawabe, K., Shigemi, S., & Arai, T. (2014). Relationship between familiarity and humanness of robots – quantification of psychological impressions toward humanoid robots. Advanced Robotics, 28(12), 821-832. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2014.893837 Kohlbacher, F., & Hang, C. C. (2011). Leveraging disruptive innovations for the silver market. In The Silver Market Phenomenon (pp. 65-77). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-14338-0_5 Mizuta, K. (2014). Human and Robots Interaction. World Futures Review, 6(3), 251-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1946756714555035 Nagamachi, M. (2013). Industrial robots and job design. Advanced Robotics, 3(2), 151-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156855389x00064 Sood, A., & Tellis, G. J. (2011). Demystifying disruption: a new model for understanding and predicting disruptive technologies. Marketing Science, 30(2), 339-354. http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mksc.1100.0617 Tani, K. (2014). Advanced Robotics a special issue on "Mechanisms for Mobile Robots". Advanced Robotics, 7(5), 523-523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156855393x00339 Walker, R. M., Damanpour, F., & Devece, C. A. (2010). Management innovation and organizational performance: The mediating effect of performance management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, muq043. https://academic.oup.com/jpart/article/21/2/367/959940/Management-Innovation-and-Organizational Wu, X., Ma, R., & Shi, Y. (2010). How do latecomer firms capture value from disruptive technologies? A secondary business-model innovation perspective. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 57(1), 51-62.http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/5378498/?reload=trueDaneshi, M. (2010). Human robots. New Scientist, 208(2790), 29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0262-4079(10)63052-7 5.0. APPENDICES Read More