The Process of Inquiry - Coursework Example

This method of inquiry assumes that there is one particular solution to any problem and no multiple solutions can exist. This system of inquiry assumes that there is only one particular truth and everything else other than this truth is false and should be discarded. It analyses a particular problem by breaking it into different parts, providing a solution to each of these solutions, and thus from these individual solutions; a final solution is deduced. (British Psychological Society, 2007) The main thing to be considered in the multiple reality inquiry process is that different solutions to a particular problem are discussed and analyzed.

These different solutions in the end may be discarded or accepted. This system of inquiry analysis presents different alternatives to the person or organization and thus analyses a particular problem from different angles before coming to a solution. The key element in multiple reality models is that the analyst or the observer keenly participates in the definition of the problem by placing the observed problem data against a theory or model which is personalized and unique to him and makes sense of the problem in these terms.

Many scholars argue that this system increases the risk associated in problem solving by increasing the ambiguity of the solution, however others believe that it mitigates the risk by considering different possibilities that might arise as solution to a problem. (Delaney, 1993) Dialectic enquiry challenges the various assumptions and theories which are used in order to come to different solutions to a problem. It is in this process of debating these assumptions and theories that a final solution may be reached by discarding some solutions or by reaching a compromise between various solutions proposed to a problem.

(Frédéric Adam, 2008)Systems’ thinking does not consider a particular problem as simple difficulty. It considers a problem as a mess of various unrelated entities which combine to form a whole. These messes give rise to emergences which are a part of the whole but may not appear to be so at the individual level. Systems’ thinking is like different weeds growing in a garden, all of them combined define the garden but individually we may not be able to find the correlation each one of them has with the whole.