Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/technology/1408316-is-google-making-us-stupid
https://studentshare.org/technology/1408316-is-google-making-us-stupid.
Carr persistently makes comparisons of past book reading and immersing experience with the jittery reading experience on the internet as an argument for internet as an unreliable tool just like he himself mentioned that people expressed about printed words when Gutenberg invented printing press in the 15th century. Despite accepting and admitting the importance of internet and Google in his life as a writer, Carr argues that it keeps human mind distracted and urges it to jump from one thing to another.
He supports the idea by discussing the experiences of Scott Karp, and Bruce Friedman. I smell a state of confusion and his inability to cope with the changing technology and its speed. Distractions can be kept at bay with the help of a number of efficient software available. Such as Freedom, LeechBlock, Menu Eclipse, Isolator, Think and Turn Off the Lights, are a few to name (Mellor).Furthermore, people with such problems should learn self-organization skills and use mind focus aids and techniques.
Carr aptly quoted Marshall McLuhan that now media is not supplying the stuff (info) to thought, it is reshaping our thought process. There is nothing wrong with change in thought process; in fact, it is highly desirable for human evolution. What if people of Stone Age had denied experiencing new things because some of them had felt afraid or irritated about it. Change and challenge are the sign of life and evolution. While considering skimming, Carr lament on the lack of thought and resulting lack of wisdom and intellect. . ck, Menu Eclipse, Isolator, Think and Turn Off the Lights, are a few to name (Mellor).
Furthermore, people with such problems should learn self-organization skills and use mind focus aids and techniques. Carr aptly quoted Marshall McLuhan that now media is not supplying the stuff (info) to thought, it is reshaping our thought process. There is nothing wrong with change in thought process; in fact, it is highly desirable for human evolution. What if people of Stone Age had denied experiencing new things because some of them had felt afraid or irritated about it. Change and challenge is the sign of life and evolution.
While considering skimming, Carr lament on lack of thought and resulting lack in wisdom and intellect. He quotes Maryanne Wolf that it is no more about what we read, it is about the way we read. Wolf herself accepts that reading is not instinctive; therefore, it is destined to be change for good. I would say, Shakespeare or Aristotle will not be born again, but we have Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, and Mark Zukerberg today. If these guys were nostalgic or afraid of new ideas, we would have missed the most amazing things tech world has given us.
Carr gives the example of Friedrich Nietzsche and his writing habit, which changed after typewriter came in his life. However, Nietzsche himself admitted that it was matter of time and he get used to it with time. Carr puts forth another weak argument that Nietzsche’s work was compromised but it is not supported by evidence. At many instances, Carr’s quotations do not support his stance directly. Such as, he quotes James Old’s study which states brains ability to reprogram and alter its functioning with time.
Carr again seems afraid of the new. Despite relying on new technologies, Carr put forth a weird argument that
...Download file to see next pages Read More