Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/systems-science/1452990-family-system-theory
https://studentshare.org/systems-science/1452990-family-system-theory.
Miller’s living systems theory also is considered for its structural elements, as it implements largely scale life systems than Bronfenbrenner’s model. Finally, Bowen’s theory is considered as it further incorporates interlocking elements into the analysis of family systems. Abstract – Depth Depth is examined in relation in relation to Bertalanffy, Bronfenbrenner, Bowen and Miller’s family systems theories. Bertalanffy’s system perspective is considered as it advances notions of family systems as necessarily embodying concerns related to interactivity.
Bronfenbrenner’s ecological system is considered as it implements specific life systems, notably the microsystem, mesosystem, and exosystem. Miller’s living systems model implements both specific elements, but also expands to include all living things. This is notable as it implements more foundational considerations than Bronfenbrenner’s approach, allowing for increased recognition of the family system. Bowen’s approach expands depth considerations through the implementation of a variety of family system investigative tools, including investigations into differentiation of self, the nuclear family emotional system, and triangles.
Abstract -- Application Bertalanffy, Bronfenbrenner, Bowen and Miller’s family systems theories are considered in terms of specific applications. . Through the foundational elements this model incorporates this perspective is applied in establishing the base elements of the system. Bowen’s approach is similarly applied in terms of its emphasis on interlocking concepts. While all of the aforementioned system components implements differing perspectives, it’s recognized that their comprehensive application will reveal different results.
The interstices of these results then can be considered as revealing more thorough insights than a singular approach could provide. Family Systems Theory While childhood development and human psychology have long been prominent scholarly considerations, the 20th century witnessed a decided shift in investigative emphasis. Within this spectrum of understanding, an increasing emphasis on the nature of environment or systems as contributing to psychological and developmental concerns emerged. Past theories were largely been rooted in mechanistic or atomistic accounts of psychology; these were largely abandoned for the more holistic perspectives inherent in systems models.
This research considers four prominent perspectives on systems theory. Specifically, notions proposed by Bertalanffy, Bronfenbrenner, Bowen and Miller are examined within the context of family systems theory. Ludwig Von Bertalanffy was one of the original theorists to consider the importance of systems within science. While his perspectives would later be adopted in terms of psychology and families, his perspectives spanned throughout science. Referred to as General Systems Theory, this perspective shifted scientific analysis of organisms from a mechanistic model, to one that emphasizes more holistic environmental concerns.
While the mechanistic approach greatly situated investigation in-terms of
...Download file to see next pages Read More