Critical Reflection and Self-Evaluation in the Context of Systems Thinking - Essay Example

It is due to the rapid changes to organizations that organizations have to readjust to the inevitable changes to cope in a highly chining environment such as the one involved in event management. Event planning changes affect the IS project outcomes in the in such a project and it is not until shortcomings are indentified in event planning that portrays a need to reassess and reevaluate the IS are taken appropriately. This brought about the concept of soft system thinking and hard thinking in the “Bear-Wear” event coaching group.

Hard systems regard to situations that human behaviors perceived to play minimal roles though there are many people involved in the system ( Waring, 1996). Hard systems in this case referred to tools, machines and to other equipment that were used in the project, which were quantifiable, predictable, and those that were relatively undisputable. Hard systems as Checkland & Holwell (1997) explain included the natural systems. Natural systems are those that are not manmade, which include the biological systems, weather, volcanoes and other natural phenomena.

Logistics and ticketing are susceptible to interruptions as a result of the hard systems such as weather and disruptions of the equipment. This was taken care of in risk awareness. On the other hand, soft systems refer to those systems that involved the team members’ behaviors and beliefs. Human beings are unpredictable in most cases in the physical aspect and the way they think. Soft systems refer to the beliefs, attitudes, behavior values, opinions that describe each of the team members. Checkland & Scholes (1999) explain that soft system methodology is intended for use in situation that exhibit crisis, uncertainty, conflict or unease in relationship among the human actors.

In the event hosting and management, different opinions and personality will surface in the team or from the clients. Advocating for creative thinking and providing coaching and counseling services to Grad Com and anyone involved will enable the team work to work harmoniously. Gesellschaft & Gemeinsschaft, which relates to sociality maintained by instrumental goals of participating individuals vs. the inherent connectedness of participating individuals (Kitayama & Cohen, 2010) were two major views that would guide in implementing operations in the event planning, management and counselling services.

Soft approach related to information in attribution of meanings and sense making and would utilize interpretative actions as the modes of managing environment around project members (Auyang, 1998). Since organisations and the IS are mutually dependent on one another, they both affect each other proportionately to make an organisation environment. Soft System thinking application Systems thinking concept was first applied to real world problems as early as 1970s and 80s. The design of system thinking was as a result of indentifying that problems were mainly caused as a result of the analyst’s inability to indentify describe objectives amongst the other, in an environment with numerous conflicting and ambitious alternatives (Auyang, 1998).

System analysts therefore led leaders and other analysts to design and construct models that could be used by analysts as devices that would help in structuring questioning procedures to address