This work, written by Carl Cohen, who is a Professor of Philosophy at the Residential College of the University of Michigan. This is not his first work, as he appears to be a very productive writer. In his career, he has published loads of essays on moral and ethical topics, which were published in philosophical, medical and legal journals. He also had a place in Medical School faculty of the University of Michigan, where he held a position of the Chairman of the University of Michigan faculty, which made him to an active member of the philosophy faculty since 1955. Thus, he is considered to be one of the trustworthy and relevant researchers of the topic. When “The Case for the Use of Animals in Biomedical Research” was published, nobody doubted the authority of the author. Also, we luckily live at the time, when the authority of the author doesn’t mean his untouchability, and thus the book had loads of reviews and critics too.
For example, one of his critics was claiming Cohen’s arguments to be unsound. He explained his saying, by continuing the thought. To him, the strategy chosen in the book, that claimed that animals have rights, which humans do not possess, the following negotiations of conclusions, are going along with other false implications. The main thought exposed, says “Since his (Cohen’s) moral principles imply that nearly all exploitive uses of animals are wrong anyway, foes of animal rights are advised to seek philosophical consolations elsewhere.”
Still, there were also positive reviews, who praised the work and stated it as a powerful weapon against animals rights violation.
We have own opinion on the book here, but as it was that controversial in reviews, we advise you to read it and come up with own opinion.