The Art of Hearing Data - Assignment Example

Research Method Research Introduction and Purpose The productivity of employees in any organisation is directly related to their skills and competencies, job satisfaction, motivation and reward programs (Pinder, 2014). According to the business scenario, the major concern of the production manager is the decreasing and unfulfilling level of performance and productivity of employees. The main motive of the production manager is to conduct a research to properly analyse the reasons behind this low performance rate of workforce. The research purpose will include the assessment of employee’s skills and competencies as per the job requirements and the analysis of the reward structure and their effectiveness on the job satisfaction, motivation and job performance of workforce. Hence, the study is focused on discussing the suitable and required research methods, strategy and techniques as per the purposes. Researchers View The analysis of skills and competencies of different employees is essential to properly allocate the job roles and responsibilities (Armstrong and Taylor, 2014). Draganidis and Mentzas, G. (2006) have mentioned that the increase in global competition has rapidly enhanced the pace of change in organisational work culture and structure which demand the continuous modification of current skill sets of the workforce. Tripathi and Agrawal, (2014) have described that the manager’s job within any organisation is to identify the employees with lower than the required skills while implementing continuous learning procedure. According to Acemoglu and Autor, (2011), analysis of the skill and competencies of workforce is also very essential to properly allocate job roles. This process allows the management to increase the work motivation and output of the employees. Lunenburg, (2011) has evaluated the Vroom’s motivational theory in accordance to the practices of reward and recognition. According to the researcher, the work motivation is highly dependent on the expectation of workforce in terms of their ability to perform a particular task and receive adequate and deserved reward. Manzoor, (2012) has evaluated that employees display less motivation and dissatisfaction in organisations which neglect the aspect of rewards. Alternatively, employees demonstrate high motivation and satisfaction with adequate growth opportunities in terms of innovative rewards program. Research Design Research design demonstrates the detailed outline regarding the steps essential for a systematic research procedure. There are generally three types of research design such as qualitative, quantitative and mixed method research design (Creswell, 2013). The quantitative research design defines the structured and systematic method of research process. This research design influences empirical investigation of different observable phenomena through mathematical or statistical techniques. Quantitative research design allows researchers to measure a wide range of observable data to establish relationship between them (Saunders and Lewis, 2012). This design can be suitable for the research purpose as it can assist the researchers to properly analyze and quantify the performances and productivity of employees. This process will also allow the researcher to measure the data related to the reward facilities and employee performance to establish relationship between them. Hence, it will allow the researcher to quantify the required reward program to motivate each employee (Yin, 2013). The quantitative research design can be considered as a feasible process as this research design assists researchers to gather more reliable and unbiased outcomes. This process can assist researchers to narrow down a wide range of data to a more reliable and achievable direction. Alternatively, this process also demonstrates various limitations. Generally, the data from quantitative research design fails to provide specific reason, answer and explanation for any situation. This process may also miss important and desired responses of the workforce regarding the cause and solutions of the situation (Creswell, 2013). Qualitative research generally involves the process of recording and analysing various data to uncover an in-depth significance and meaning of human experiences and behaviours. This process assists researchers to gather complex and rich understanding about the experiences of each individual while eliminating the process of generalizing a large group (Merriam, 2014). This research design can be suitable for the organisation as it will assist the management to indulge in an in-depth analysis of the experiences and believes of employees that is hindering their work motivation and satisfaction. This research design will enable the management to properly evaluate the skills and competencies of employees in comparison to their job responsibilities. Hence, it will assist them to design the employee job role and training program accordingly (Corbin and Strauss, 2014). This process can be feasible for the management as it will reduce the complexity of the research purpose. This process can be more conducted within limited budget. On the other hand, the limitation of this process includes long time requirement for planning. The outcome of qualitative research process will base on judgments and opinions. Hence, it will provide guidance to the management rather than any quantifying result (Creswell, 2013). The pragmatic approach or mixed method research design generally takes account of both the research perspective such as quantitative and qualitative. This design considers that every research method has limitations. Hence, selections of different approach will complement each other (Saunders and Lewis, 2012). The possibility of triangulation is the most beneficial criteria of this research design. Triangulation allows the researcher to identify multiple research aspects to evaluate the research result more accurately. This design will be more suitable for the research purpose as it will allow the management to use the virtues of quantitative as well as qualitative research design. The quantitative research process will assist them to quantify and measure the rewards and employee productivity in comparison to their work motivation while the qualitative process will enable them to gather feedbacks and details regarding employee competencies and performances in comparison to their job responsibilities (Morse and Cheek, 2014). This research design will be more feasible for this study as it will enable the management to focus on the performance statistic as well as the motivational factors of the employees. Hence, it will give more complete and comprehensive understanding of the research problem (Östlund, et al., 2011). The discussion regarding different research design has evaluated the importance of mixed method approach for the research process. As per the discussion, both quantitative and qualitative research designs are equally important for the study. Hence, the mixed approach will assist the management to use both of those research processes adequately to solve the complexity of the research problem. Research Approaches There are mainly two different research approaches such as deductive and inductive. Deductive approach of research is targeted to test existing theories, while, inductive approach is aimed to generate new theories from emerging data. Deductive approach can be emphasized with hypotheses that can be derived from different theories (Ary, et al., 2013). On the other hand, inductive approach utilizes observations for the research process. This approach also focuses on formulating new theories at the end of the study. Hence, both approaches are equally important to derive and simplify the complex knowledge and information of the study. The inductive approach is associated with qualitative research while the deductive approach is more focused on quantitative research. Hence, both demonstrate equal importance for the pragmatic research design (Gray, 2013). Research Methodologies Face-to-face in-depth interviewing will be one of the major research methodologies for the research study (Kumar, 2008). This process will assist the management to properly gather an insight regarding the employee behaviour, impact of various motivational and satisfaction factors as well as their skills and competencies (Rubin and Rubin, 2011). The in-depth findings and understanding of the qualitative research will allow the management to generate questionnaire to measure the attitude and performance of the large scale employee sample with the assistance of likert scale methodology to properly conduct statistical analysis regarding the productivity and reward function (Kothari, 2011). Research Strategy and Technique for Data Collection and Analysis The research method will follow the primary data collection procedure which will encourage the researchers to collect data directly from the employees and organisational records. The data and information will be collected from the internal sources of the organisation which will include the general workforce, higher level authorities and human resources personnel. The primary data collection procedure has been selected to gather fresh and original data from the respondents. Hence, this process will allow proper and accurate evaluation of the situation. The major research strategy for the primary data collection process is questionnaire survey and likert scale analysis. The questionnaire survey will assist the management to collect an in-depth information from all the employees, while, the likert scale analysis will allow them to efficiently carry out the statistical analysis part (Wilcox, et al., 2012). Reference List Acemoglu, D. and Autor, D., 2011. Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. Handbook of labor economics, 4, pp. 1043-1171. Armstrong, M. and Taylor, S., 2014. Armstrongs handbook of human resource management practice. London: Kogan Page Publishers. Ary, D., Jacobs, L., Sorensen, C. and Walker, D., 2013. Introduction to research in education. Connecticut: Cengage Learning. Corbin, J. and Strauss, A., 2014. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage publications. Creswell, J. W., 2013. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage publications. Draganidis, F. and Mentzas, G., 2006. Competency based management: a review of systems and approaches. Information Management & Computer Security, 14(1), pp. 51-64. Gray, D. E., 2013. Doing research in the real world. London: Sage. Kothari, C. R., 2011. Research methodology: methods and techniques. New Delhi: New Age International. Kumar, R. 2008. Research Methodology. New Delhi: APH Publishing. Lunenburg, F. C., 2011. Expectancy theory of motivation: motivating by altering expectations. International Journal of management, business, and administration, 15(1), pp. 1-6. Manzoor, Q. A., 2012. Impact of employees motivation on organizational effectiveness. Business management and strategy, 3(1), p. 1. Merriam, S. B., 2014. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. Morse, J. M. and Cheek, J., 2014. Making room for qualitatively-driven mixed-method research. Qualitative health research, 24(1), pp. 3-5. Östlund, U., Kidd, L., Wengström, Y. and Rowa-Dewar, N., 2011. Combining qualitative and quantitative research within mixed method research designs: a methodological review. International journal of nursing studies, 48(3), pp. 369-383. Pinder, C. C., 2014. Work motivation in organizational behavior. New York: Psychology Press. Rubin, H. J. and Rubin, I. S., 2011. Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. London: Sage. Saunders, M. and Lewis, P., 2012. Doing Research in Business and Management. An Essential Guide to Planning your Project. London: Prentice Hall Tripathi, K. and Agrawal, M., 2014. Competency Based Management In Organizational. Global Journal of Finance and Management, 6(4), pp. 349-356. Wilcox, A. B., Gallagher, K. D., Boden-Albala, B. and Bakken, S. R., 2012. Research data collection methods: from paper to tablet computers. Medical care, 50, pp. 68-73. Yin, R. K., 2013. Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage publications. Read More