Writing the result section of a research paper - Statistics Project Example

Writing the Result Section of a Research Paper Introduction The answers in this paper are those relating to the different tasks or questions assigned inside the SPSS tutorial guide provided for this assignment and which also doubles up as the sole reference material for this paper. The charts provided therefore specifically refer to the task or question being tackled. Table 1: Demographic Characteristics of respondents NMinimumMaximumMeanStd. DeviationAge at study entry30246042.1311.837type of EMS30131.77.817EDSS score30253.18.825Distance(M) in 6 minute walk test with no assistance30156406283.3072.502Distance(M) in 6 minute walk test with assistive device30172426296.6369.853Visual analogue scale(mm)for fatigue in 6 MWT with no device30268555.0014.883Visual analogue scale(mm) for fatigue in 6 MWT with assistive device30216843.4313.148Change in VAS30-39.0016.00-11.566713.54350Change in 6 MWT30-47.0053.0013.333322.94120Valid N (list wise)30 As shown in table 1, the total number of subjects involved in the study was 30 participants.

The mean age of the participants was 42.13 years with the minimum and maximum ages of the respondents being 24 and 60 years. The mean of the EDSS score was 3.18.With regard to the distance walked without an assistive device, the mean distance covered in meters was 283.3 while the mean of the distance covered with an assistive device being 296.63.The mean for VAS 1 was 55.3 while the mean for VAS 2 was 43.43Task -Data Comparison The question relates to the use of paired sample T-Test and aims to answer the question “Is walking with the device less fatiguing than walking without the device? .This is achieved by comparing the VAS instead of 6 MWT distance.

Chart 1 shows the mean differences of VAS.Chart 1: Paired Samples Statistics for VAS As shown in chart 1, the mean fatigue for the 6MWT distance for subjects without an assistive device is higher (55.0) compared to the one for those with an assistive device (43.43).This result points out that it is less fatiguing to walk with the assistive device because the p value following the paired sample T-test for VAS is significant at 0.00.Again this is below the 0.05 significance level.The second question to be answered is “Did the subjects walk further with assistive device?

and the task also requires the use of a paired sample T-test. A paired sample T-test comparison points out that the mean distance covered with an assistive device is higher compared to that covered with a non assistive device(as shown in table 1). The P value got from the paired sample T-test is 0.03 and it is considered significant for it is below the 0.05 level. The means for distance 1(without an assistive device) and distance 2 (with an assistive device) are 283.30 and 296.63 respectively.

The percentage difference of these means is shown in chart 2 belowChart 2: Percentage difference of mean distance coveredReferenceBarr, C. (n.d). Basic Research Methods. Introduction to SPSS. Tutorial guide