StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Analysis and Interpretation - Statistics Project Example

Cite this document
Summary
The following project "Analysis and Interpretation" encompasses the understanding of analysis and interpretation in research work. As the text has it, researchers generally seek to generalize their results from the available data to some larger context by generalizing a sample to a population. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.3% of users find it useful
Analysis and Interpretation
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Analysis and Interpretation"

Statistical assumptions Researchers generally seek to generalize their results from the available data to some larger context by generalizing a sample to a population. Statistical assumptions are important aspect of empirical studies. This study, just like any other study, applies some statistical assumptions in order to achieve at the desired results. The statistical assumptions are: The mean difference is zero The data is normally distributed The variance of the two variables are equal (homoscedasticity) The observations are independent of each other Linearity of graded responses to quantitative stimuli The independent variable of the study is “attending religious services” while the dependent variable is “political views”. The study mainly duels on correlation and regression for data analysis. Correlation coefficient is important in showing whether and how strongly religious service attendance and political views are related. Because the study is linear in nature, Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient is necessary to measure the direction and strength of the linear relationship between religious service attendance and political views. The value of Pearson’s correlation coefficient is influenced by the distribution of the independent (attending religious services) variable in the sample. Hypothesis statement The null hypothesis for the study is described below: Ho: the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups Ha: the error variance of the dependent variable is not equal across groups Results Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable: THINK OF SELF AS LIBERAL OR CONSERVATIVE Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Partial Eta Squared Corrected Model 98.521a 8 12.315 6.646 .000 .071 Intercept 10576.996 1 10576.996 5707.657 .000 .892 ATTEND 98.521 8 12.315 6.646 .000 .071 Error 1286.068 694 1.853 Total 13705.000 703 Corrected Total 1384.589 702 a. R Squared = .071 (Adjusted R Squared = .060) Dependent Variable: THINK OF SELF AS LIBERAL OR CONSERVATIVE F df1 df2 Sig. 3.455 8 694 .001 Descriptive Statistics Dependent Variable: THINK OF SELF AS LIBERAL OR CONSERVATIVE HOW OFTEN R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES Mean Std. Deviation N NEVER 3.68 1.407 110 LT ONCE A YEAR 3.65 1.205 55 ONCE A YEAR 4.09 1.244 98 SEVRL TIMES A YR 4.08 1.342 89 ONCE A MONTH 4.32 .913 50 2-3X A MONTH 4.03 1.470 63 NRLY EVERY WEEK 4.47 1.298 36 EVERY WEEK 4.60 1.482 134 MORE THN ONCE WK 4.79 1.531 68 Total 4.19 1.404 703 Multiple Comparisons Dependent Variable: THINK OF SELF AS LIBERAL OR CONSERVATIVE (I) HOW OFTEN R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES (J) HOW OFTEN R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES Mean Difference (I-J) Std. Error Sig. 95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound Upper Bound Tukey HSD NEVER LT ONCE A YEAR .03 .225 1.000 -.67 .73 ONCE A YEAR -.41 .189 .428 -1.00 .18 SEVRL TIMES A YR -.40 .194 .513 -1.00 .21 ONCE A MONTH -.64 .232 .133 -1.36 .08 2-3X A MONTH -.35 .215 .790 -1.02 .32 NRLY EVERY WEEK -.79 .261 .064 -1.60 .02 EVERY WEEK -.92* .175 .000 -1.46 -.37 MORE THN ONCE WK -1.11* .210 .000 -1.77 -.46 LT ONCE A YEAR NEVER -.03 .225 1.000 -.73 .67 ONCE A YEAR -.44 .229 .609 -1.15 .28 SEVRL TIMES A YR -.42 .233 .671 -1.15 .30 ONCE A MONTH -.67 .266 .233 -1.49 .16 2-3X A MONTH -.38 .251 .855 -1.16 .40 NRLY EVERY WEEK -.82 .292 .117 -1.73 .09 EVERY WEEK -.94* .218 .001 -1.62 -.26 MORE THN ONCE WK -1.14* .247 .000 -1.91 -.37 ONCE A YEAR NEVER .41 .189 .428 -.18 1.00 LT ONCE A YEAR .44 .229 .609 -.28 1.15 SEVRL TIMES A YR .01 .199 1.000 -.61 .63 ONCE A MONTH -.23 .237 .989 -.96 .51 2-3X A MONTH .06 .220 1.000 -.62 .74 NRLY EVERY WEEK -.38 .265 .885 -1.21 .45 EVERY WEEK -.51 .181 .120 -1.07 .06 MORE THN ONCE WK -.70* .215 .031 -1.37 -.03 SEVRL TIMES A YR NEVER .40 .194 .513 -.21 1.00 LT ONCE A YEAR .42 .233 .671 -.30 1.15 ONCE A YEAR -.01 .199 1.000 -.63 .61 ONCE A MONTH -.24 .241 .986 -.99 .51 2-3X A MONTH .05 .224 1.000 -.65 .74 NRLY EVERY WEEK -.39 .269 .872 -1.23 .44 EVERY WEEK -.52 .186 .122 -1.10 .06 MORE THN ONCE WK -.72* .219 .032 -1.40 -.03 ONCE A MONTH NEVER .64 .232 .133 -.08 1.36 LT ONCE A YEAR .67 .266 .233 -.16 1.49 ONCE A YEAR .23 .237 .989 -.51 .96 SEVRL TIMES A YR .24 .241 .986 -.51 .99 2-3X A MONTH .29 .258 .971 -.51 1.09 NRLY EVERY WEEK -.15 .298 1.000 -1.08 .77 EVERY WEEK -.28 .226 .950 -.98 .42 MORE THN ONCE WK -.47 .254 .635 -1.26 .31 2-3X A MONTH NEVER .35 .215 .790 -.32 1.02 LT ONCE A YEAR .38 .251 .855 -.40 1.16 ONCE A YEAR -.06 .220 1.000 -.74 .62 SEVRL TIMES A YR -.05 .224 1.000 -.74 .65 ONCE A MONTH -.29 .258 .971 -1.09 .51 NRLY EVERY WEEK -.44 .284 .832 -1.33 .44 EVERY WEEK -.57 .208 .143 -1.21 .08 MORE THN ONCE WK -.76* .238 .038 -1.50 -.02 NRLY EVERY WEEK NEVER .79 .261 .064 -.02 1.60 LT ONCE A YEAR .82 .292 .117 -.09 1.73 ONCE A YEAR .38 .265 .885 -.45 1.21 SEVRL TIMES A YR .39 .269 .872 -.44 1.23 ONCE A MONTH .15 .298 1.000 -.77 1.08 2-3X A MONTH .44 .284 .832 -.44 1.33 EVERY WEEK -.12 .256 1.000 -.92 .67 MORE THN ONCE WK -.32 .281 .967 -1.19 .55 EVERY WEEK NEVER .92* .175 .000 .37 1.46 LT ONCE A YEAR .94* .218 .001 .26 1.62 ONCE A YEAR .51 .181 .120 -.06 1.07 SEVRL TIMES A YR .52 .186 .122 -.06 1.10 ONCE A MONTH .28 .226 .950 -.42 .98 2-3X A MONTH .57 .208 .143 -.08 1.21 NRLY EVERY WEEK .12 .256 1.000 -.67 .92 MORE THN ONCE WK -.20 .203 .988 -.83 .43 MORE THN ONCE WK NEVER 1.11* .210 .000 .46 1.77 LT ONCE A YEAR 1.14* .247 .000 .37 1.91 ONCE A YEAR .70* .215 .031 .03 1.37 SEVRL TIMES A YR .72* .219 .032 .03 1.40 ONCE A MONTH .47 .254 .635 -.31 1.26 2-3X A MONTH .76* .238 .038 .02 1.50 NRLY EVERY WEEK .32 .281 .967 -.55 1.19 EVERY WEEK .20 .203 .988 -.43 .83 LSD NEVER LT ONCE A YEAR .03 .225 .903 -.41 .47 ONCE A YEAR -.41* .189 .030 -.78 -.04 SEVRL TIMES A YR -.40* .194 .041 -.78 -.02 ONCE A MONTH -.64* .232 .006 -1.09 -.18 2-3X A MONTH -.35 .215 .104 -.77 .07 NRLY EVERY WEEK -.79* .261 .003 -1.30 -.28 EVERY WEEK -.92* .175 .000 -1.26 -.57 MORE THN ONCE WK -1.11* .210 .000 -1.52 -.70 LT ONCE A YEAR NEVER -.03 .225 .903 -.47 .41 ONCE A YEAR -.44 .229 .057 -.89 .01 SEVRL TIMES A YR -.42 .233 .070 -.88 .03 ONCE A MONTH -.67* .266 .013 -1.19 -.14 2-3X A MONTH -.38 .251 .134 -.87 .12 NRLY EVERY WEEK -.82* .292 .005 -1.39 -.24 EVERY WEEK -.94* .218 .000 -1.37 -.51 MORE THN ONCE WK -1.14* .247 .000 -1.62 -.65 ONCE A YEAR NEVER .41* .189 .030 .04 .78 LT ONCE A YEAR .44 .229 .057 -.01 .89 SEVRL TIMES A YR .01 .199 .947 -.38 .40 ONCE A MONTH -.23 .237 .335 -.69 .24 2-3X A MONTH .06 .220 .785 -.37 .49 NRLY EVERY WEEK -.38 .265 .152 -.90 .14 EVERY WEEK -.51* .181 .005 -.86 -.15 MORE THN ONCE WK -.70* .215 .001 -1.12 -.28 SEVRL TIMES A YR NEVER .40* .194 .041 .02 .78 LT ONCE A YEAR .42 .233 .070 -.03 .88 ONCE A YEAR -.01 .199 .947 -.40 .38 ONCE A MONTH -.24 .241 .316 -.71 .23 2-3X A MONTH .05 .224 .834 -.39 .49 NRLY EVERY WEEK -.39 .269 .144 -.92 .13 EVERY WEEK -.52* .186 .006 -.88 -.15 MORE THN ONCE WK -.72* .219 .001 -1.15 -.28 ONCE A MONTH NEVER .64* .232 .006 .18 1.09 LT ONCE A YEAR .67* .266 .013 .14 1.19 ONCE A YEAR .23 .237 .335 -.24 .69 SEVRL TIMES A YR .24 .241 .316 -.23 .71 2-3X A MONTH .29 .258 .264 -.22 .79 NRLY EVERY WEEK -.15 .298 .609 -.74 .43 EVERY WEEK -.28 .226 .220 -.72 .17 MORE THN ONCE WK -.47 .254 .062 -.97 .02 2-3X A MONTH NEVER .35 .215 .104 -.07 .77 LT ONCE A YEAR .38 .251 .134 -.12 .87 ONCE A YEAR -.06 .220 .785 -.49 .37 SEVRL TIMES A YR -.05 .224 .834 -.49 .39 ONCE A MONTH -.29 .258 .264 -.79 .22 NRLY EVERY WEEK -.44 .284 .122 -1.00 .12 EVERY WEEK -.57* .208 .007 -.97 -.16 MORE THN ONCE WK -.76* .238 .001 -1.23 -.29 NRLY EVERY WEEK NEVER .79* .261 .003 .28 1.30 LT ONCE A YEAR .82* .292 .005 .24 1.39 ONCE A YEAR .38 .265 .152 -.14 .90 SEVRL TIMES A YR .39 .269 .144 -.13 .92 ONCE A MONTH .15 .298 .609 -.43 .74 2-3X A MONTH .44 .284 .122 -.12 1.00 EVERY WEEK -.12 .256 .625 -.63 .38 MORE THN ONCE WK -.32 .281 .252 -.87 .23 EVERY WEEK NEVER .92* .175 .000 .57 1.26 LT ONCE A YEAR .94* .218 .000 .51 1.37 ONCE A YEAR .51* .181 .005 .15 .86 SEVRL TIMES A YR .52* .186 .006 .15 .88 ONCE A MONTH .28 .226 .220 -.17 .72 2-3X A MONTH .57* .208 .007 .16 .97 NRLY EVERY WEEK .12 .256 .625 -.38 .63 MORE THN ONCE WK -.20 .203 .331 -.60 .20 MORE THN ONCE WK NEVER 1.11* .210 .000 .70 1.52 LT ONCE A YEAR 1.14* .247 .000 .65 1.62 ONCE A YEAR .70* .215 .001 .28 1.12 SEVRL TIMES A YR .72* .219 .001 .28 1.15 ONCE A MONTH .47 .254 .062 -.02 .97 2-3X A MONTH .76* .238 .001 .29 1.23 NRLY EVERY WEEK .32 .281 .252 -.23 .87 EVERY WEEK .20 .203 .331 -.20 .60 Based on observed means. The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 1.853. *. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level. Homogeneous Subsets THINK OF SELF AS LIBERAL OR CONSERVATIVE HOW OFTEN R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES N Subset 1 2 3 TukeyHSDa,b,c LT ONCE A YEAR 55 3.65 NEVER 110 3.68 2-3X A MONTH 63 4.03 4.03 SEVRL TIMES A YR 89 4.08 4.08 4.08 ONCE A YEAR 98 4.09 4.09 4.09 ONCE A MONTH 50 4.32 4.32 4.32 NRLY EVERY WEEK 36 4.47 4.47 EVERY WEEK 134 4.60 4.60 MORE THN ONCE WK 68 4.79 Sig. .109 .285 .062 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. Based on observed means. The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 1.853. a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 66.899. b. The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed. c. Alpha = .05. Profile Plots Interpretation The descriptive results show that the mean and the standard deviation of the study are 4.19 and 1.404 respectively. The sample size for the study is 703. Taking 95% confidence interval, DF1 and DF2 are 8 and 694 respectively. This shows the difference of means between the groups with a significant level of 0.05. The p-value is the probability of obtaining a test statistic at least extreme as the one that was actually observed (Cronk, 2008). The p-value of the study is 0.01 at 95% confidence interval. The error term of the study is the mean square=1.853 with the harmonic mean sample size of 66.899. The harmonic mean is used in the study because the group sizes are not equal. The harmonic mean result shows that 66 out of 703 of the people interviewed attend religious services several times in a year. The confidence interval of the study is 95%. This shows that there is 95% confidence that the real value is within the calculated interval (mean). The Pearson correlation coefficient is 1. This means that there is a strong positive correlation between religious services and political views. The correlation coefficients across all the age groups also show positive results. The positive sign shows that both attending religious services and political views changes towards a similar direction. Most of the people (134) interviewed attend religious services every week while 36 people who gave their opinions attend religious nearly every week. Hypothesis testing The one way Anova gives a p-value of 0.01. The study uses 95% confidence interval that means the significance level is 0.05. Therefore, the P-value (0.01) < significance level (0.05) and as a result we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis (Cronk, 2008). We conclude therefore that the error variance of the dependent variable is not equal across groups. Conclusion From the statistical results of the study, it is clear that political views are affected by how often an individual attend religious services. Most people who gave their views regarding his/her political position attend religious services regularly. This statement is emphasized by the results from the profile graph. The graph shows a rather interesting trend whereby the mean increases with an increase in the religious service attendance. Those who had never attended religious services had the least mean while those who attend religious services more than once a week have the highest mean. However, the error variance of the political views is not the same across all the groups. For that reason, we use the harmonic mean instead of arithmetic mean. This is a representation of a real world where people tend to related to a political party or ideology based on his/her religious experience. Nevertheless, it should be noted that religion is just one of the factors that influence choice on political party affiliation. References Cronk, B. C. (2008). How to use SPSS: A step-by-step guide to analysis and interpretation. Glendale, CA: Pyrczak Pub. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Analysis and Interpretation Statistics Project Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/statistics/1613927-statistics-write-up-review-data-and-provide-apa-write-up-for-oneway-anova-w-post-hoc-see-detailed-instruction
(Analysis and Interpretation Statistics Project Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
https://studentshare.org/statistics/1613927-statistics-write-up-review-data-and-provide-apa-write-up-for-oneway-anova-w-post-hoc-see-detailed-instruction.
“Analysis and Interpretation Statistics Project Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/statistics/1613927-statistics-write-up-review-data-and-provide-apa-write-up-for-oneway-anova-w-post-hoc-see-detailed-instruction.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Analysis and Interpretation

Statistical Analysis and Interpretation for Etisalat Telecom Corporation

hellip; The splits allow for the analysis and developed information regarding the position of youth market and the overwhelming occurrence of the grey market across the globe.... Demographic splits and financial statements take an important position in developing world due to important information that business people acquire from the analysis of demographic splits.... It is only from the analysis of the demographic splits that information concerning the youth market and details from the grey markets, added to make a genuine report regarding companies' financial status....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Analysis and Interpretation of Art Works

Name: Professor: Course: Date: Analysis and Interpretation of artworks According to research done on artworks from the mid-1990s, the development of new media art has been noted as one of the most significant forces for both cultural development and economics worldwide.... hellip; It is due to this research that the concept of the artworks has been able to establish its institutions....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

TARGET CORPORATION FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

Question: Determine the working capital and current ratios for 2004, 2005, and 2006 for the Target Corporation based on the information contained in the consolidated balance sheets in Appendix A.... Did Target's working capital and current ratio increase or decrease from 2004 to… For Target Corporation, the level of working capital and current ratio has been decreasing since 2004....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

TARGET CORPORATION FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

d] TARGET CORPORATION FINANCIAL Analysis and Interpretation Target Corporation Target Corporation Perform their business as Target, is an American department store.... Target Corporation's Financial analysis:In order to define whether an organization is doing sound we must go through a few things....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Statistical Analysis and Interpretation for Etisalat Telecom Corporation

The analysis is based on a total of 826 questionnaire responses received.... The 668 questionnaires were received for sections A and B of the questionnaire while… The analysis was carried out using SPSS version 20.... This is done through description of results of the study where the frequencies, Next is the presentation of results of reliability analysis are presented for all the items used in the questionnaire and for each item used in the questionnaire....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

IQ Data Analysis and Interpretation

From the paper "IQ Data Analysis and Interpretation" it is clear that common measures of central tendency are the mean, median and mode.... IQ Data analysis and InterpretationThe common measures of central tendency are the mean, median and mode.... The mean of Intelligence Quotient scores is calculated by summing up the individual scores and dividing the result by the total number of scores....
1 Pages (250 words) Assignment

Analysis and Interpretation of Financial Statements: Intec Telecom Plc

The author of this paper provides a financial analysis of the Intec Telecom Plc company during the years 2008 and 2009 and based on this analysis the recommendations are formulated as to whether the investors should buy the stock of this firm or not.... Financial analysis provides critical insight into the manner in which an organization is managed.... Financial ratio analysis involves how the analyst actually carefully selects the different pieces of data from the financial statements and uses this data to get an understanding of how the firm will actually perform in the future based on the historical performance of the firm....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

Dudley Randall's Ballad of Birmingham: Literary Analysis and Interpretation

This is the "Dudley Randall's Ballad of Birmingham: Literary Analysis and Interpretation" essay.... In Dudley Randall's Ballad of Birmingham: Literary Analysis and Interpretation, Randall had worked in several places over his time, gaining the experiences he required to be successful in life....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us