The researcher has failed to elaborate on the specific social or medical constructions that contribute to the stigmatization of aneroxia. Moreover, it is not clear whether the focus of the study is directed towards how anorexia is constructed as a social identity and how it is managed by young women or how aneroxia is stigmazed and how young women resist such stigmatization. Moreover, the relationship between the variables in this study is not clear. The researcher has not clearly showed the connection between anorexic subjectivities and the practices employed by young women to address or managed such subjectivities.
Literature Reviewed This research article has drawn on various literature sources in order to provide a theoretical foundation/ background for the study. Throughout the study Rich (2006) has referred to different research studies to provide different perspectives, constructions and stigmatization of aneroxia. The literature review in this study is systematic in nature, the author begins by exploring the prevalence of eating disorders and current trends in research particularly in relation to the discourses presented on aneroxia.
By alluding to previously conducted studies by Malson (1998), Hepworth (1999), Warin (2002) and Warin (2004), Rich (2006) establishes the existing gap in literature particularly when it comes to how young women manage discourses and constructions surrounding aneroxia. The author then explores the existing constructions and how they propagate stigmatization of persons living with aneroxia. In reference to findings from studies by Cogan (1991), Malson (1998) and Rich et al (2004), the author explores the discursive constraints brought about the stigmatization of anorexia which is a key theme of this research article.
Although the literature review section in this paper covers key discussions on different constructions and stigmatization of aneroxia, it is not exhaustive in nature. The author’s review seems to focus on one angle of the argument especially when it comes to the discursive constraints of aneroxia. The key argument in this case portrays anorexia is condition that is subjected to negative construction. Despite the fact that different literature sources have been used, alternatives views or counter arguments have not been explored in-depth.
In essence, the literature review lacks a critical synthesis of different constructions and stigmatization of aneroxia (Rich (2006). Drawing on various literature sources the author has managed to clearly and consistently bring out the relationship between the stigmatization in discourse of aneroxia and the management strategies used by young women to cope with aneroxia both a social identity and an illness. Overall the literature review has demonstrated the significance of the study by not only highlighting the existing gaps in literature but by also providing a theoretical background that supplements the study’s findings on how young women living with aneroxia negotiate different discourses on aneroxia in order to manage the condition both as an identity and illness (Rich 2006).
Research Design This study employs a qualitative research design that encompasses the use of an ethnographic approach. Rich (2006) describes the research design as one that involves a small qualitative study using of a range of ethnographic data and voices from a leading centre in the UK for the treatment of eating disorders. The research design further involves the triangulation of a range of ethnographic data and the use of a feminist post-structuralist analysis approach. Since the key aim of this study is to examine the real life experiences of how young women living with aneroxia manage the condition both as an identity and illness, the use of an ethnographic approach is suitable.
In this regard, Barbie (2012), observes that an ethnographic approach provides a suitable framework for researchers to examine and interpret the real life experiences from the point of view of the research subjects.
Read More