In adults aged 25-44 years, AIDS was the leading cause of death after malaria by the year 2000 with an estimated 1.8 million Ugandans being infected with HIV (Sengendo &Sekatawa 1999). Initially, the AIDS epidemic in Uganda was concentrated near Lake Victoria and along the transnational highway from Kenya through Uganda to Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo but was with time spread to other parts of the country with the northern region being the hardly hit part of the country (Sengendo &Sekatawa 1999).
Furthermore, Sengendo &Sekatawa (1999) indicate that the most at risk populations in the early days of the epidemic in the country were the commercial sex workers, long distance truck drivers, urban residents, the youth and single women. Areas in the northern region have had the highest HIV prevalence with time and statistics show that half of the twelve districts highly affected by HIV come from the northern region (Sengendo &Sekatawa 1999). A 2004 UNAIDS/WHO Epidemiological Fact Sheet provided the statistics that the HIV prevalence among pregnant women in Kampala declined from 28 percent in 1991 to 6 percent in 2001 whereas the prevalence among pregnant women outside Kampala was 13 percent in 1992 and declined to 4.
7 percent in 2002. In addition, 66 percent of 85 sex workers studied in 1997 were found to be HIV positive. From 1989-1999, HIV prevalence decreased among STI patients in Kampala from 52 percent to 23 percent. However, there was a recorded increase in HIV prevalence among military recruits in Kampala from 16 percent in 1992 to 27 percent in 1996 (UNAIDS/WHO Working Group on Global HIV/AIDS and STI Surveillance 2004). A 2010 health profile report about Uganda’s HIV situation by USAID shows that prevalence varies from one region to the other due to religious and cultural differences as well as urbanization.
For instance, the Northwest region has a lower HIV prevalence due to strict Islamic values whereas the North Eastern region is very rural and does not have much external interaction with other regions. On the other hand, the Central, Kampala and North Central regions have higher HIV percentage of above 8 percent due to the high levels of urbanization (USAID 2010). Demographically, women are hardest hit by the epidemic in all regions where the prevalence peaks between ages 30 to 34 years, which represents 12 percent prevalence (USAID 2010).
These high infections can be attributed to high rates of sexual violence especially among teenage women who have reported numerous cases of rape. Married women are also more at risk of contracting HIV than women who have never been married (USAID 2010). In terms of wealth, statistics indicate that HIV prevalence is higher among the rich population as well as those that are in stable employment but decreases among the poor and unemployed (USAID 2010). Age wise, it is evident that HIV prevalence is higher among the youth because they are more sexually active as compared to other age groups.
However, the most at risk populations in Uganda include commercial sex workers, fishing communities, internally displaced people and refugees, long-distance truck drivers, persons in uniformed services such as the army and people with disabilities (USAID 2010). Response to STIs and HIV/AIDS in Uganda In the mid 90s when the AIDS epidemic prevalence rates increased in other parts of the world, Uganda surprised the world by reporting a decline in the infection rates of the disease in the country as from 1993.
This success story can be attributed to several AIDS intervention and prevention strategies that have been put in place by the government of Uganda as well as by the civil society. Firstly, there is the active involvement of the government in the nationwide AIDS campaign. In 1986 the national AIDS Control Programme (ACP) was set up and mandated with the duty of studying the extent to which the disease had spread and the modes of transmission. It was also endowed with the responsibility of ensuring that the national blood bank was safe to reduce transmission of the disease through blood transfusion (Tumushabe 2006).
Read More