However, the animal testing may cover other investigations such as behavior observation such as the Thorndike theory among others. Such studies for behavior are legal and inhumane. Moreover, it has been identified that the animal testing has failed when subjected to human beings (Adams, 1995). The existing laws do not focus on the animal testing that is seen to be immoral; therefore, there is a need to ban these practices to reduce animal suffering and failure rates. For feminists to consume products of such animal is a mockery of their calls.
Feminists advocate the protection of animal rights. Different factors need to be considered when weighing the humiliating these animals and increased failure rate for the targeted outcome. For instance, research shows that more than five hundred million animals in US laboratories due to the animal testing procedures while 75 million cows end up being killed without even being tested. In UK, animal testing has increased by 0.3 % over as compared to the year 2012 as more than four million animals being subjected to such animal torture.
During these procedures, the animals are burnt, maimed or even skinned alive as other are subjected to powerful and potent drugs that their bodies cannot withstand. This is what feminists try to abhor. Animals have many rights that call for protection. This lab testing takes longer time even to a maximum of a year with the animals in such conditions. One primary testing that is carried on rabbits entails the Draize testing where strong chemicals are injected into the eyes of cows without any anesthesia reliever.
Other testing includes skin irritancy and oral toxicity. The results are recorded for more than a month while others even over a year. These results are then used to develop medicines for human cure. It is, therefore, necessary to have stringent laws that combat such animal torturer. Feminism strives to protect the female gender from unruly treatment in the society. Research by Antivivisection Society in England ascertains that the animals that survive after being subjected to these drugs end up exhibiting different complications.
The research shows that animals that are once injected with such drugs ends up having continued diarrhea, monkeys mutilate their selves or even pull out their hair, as a result, of the harmful tests that are done on them. Other investigations reveal that the Chimpanzees that were once subjected to harmful animal testing end up having extreme fear for a long time. Moreover, other animals show inflammatory conditions on their skins that when they become chronic, they increase the chances of death to the animal.
Animals that are kept in kennels do not have any comfort and after their several days of suffering they are killed since their survival chances are minimal or intentionally killed not to spread the diseases to human beings. However, there are no compliance rules to safety, and no one bothers to attend to these animals after they are done with their testing. On another hand, the animal testing is not practical since it does not guarantee quick results and accurate ones. Research has proved that most of the animal testing has been successful for the animals and has failed in the humans.
For, instance it is noticed that the sleeping pill was successful in the rats and later when introduced to human babies, it failed to work. In addition, the children introduced to the medicine developed different deformities. Additionally, the test on arthritis drug had protective effects on the rats and pigs brought disaster when subjected to human conditions. Research reveals that the drug led to 27,000 cases of heart attack in humans and cardiac arrest deaths across the globe. Therefore, it can be noticed that the testing takes longer time and brings damage to the environment and does not achieve that anticipated outcome.
This brings out the need to adopt regulations and laws that regulate or bans the animal testing. Nutrition health and feminism all go hand in hand.
Read More