Social Farming - Operational Programs that support Social Farming in Developing Countries - Case Study Example

Download file to see previous pages The different rural communities frequently contain weak social structures and services that have an adverse influence on local opportunities and occupations. Similarly, various available economic regimes in many countries are not redistributive, therefore, facilitating an expanding inequality, especially in the countries that have little resources for a public utility (Kinsella et al., 2014). The first aim is to identify, support, and adopt socially creative and innovative practices that can marshal dynamically community resources to be able to respond to the crucial social needs. Social farming has been found to be very sustainable due to its encouragement efforts of nature founded solutions that mainly utilize animals, plants, and cultural lifestyles to enhance rehabilitation, social remedy and inclusion, education and various social services in the local and urbanized regions (Mcgloin & Connor, 2007). Additionally, social farming is presented as inclusive as it emphasizes on the reunion of various ad hoc groups of people who stay and work as a unit with social practitioners and household farmers on the sites of the farm. Initiatives such as the one described tackling various requirements of the less empowered individuals such as the youth, drug and alcohol addicts, people with psychiatric and practical disabilities, the elderly people, terminal, patients, and long-term unemployed people. Social farming is also a smart initiative because it ensures the organization of natural resources and structures them roughly for the development of extra economic and social value that embraces the retro innovative culture in agriculture moving from primary food production to multipurpose farming. (SoFar Project, n.d.). Therefore, in my opinion, social farming is one of the best initiatives, which should be recognized and embraced by various institutions, international bodies, and nongovernmental organizations because it is very beneficial to its users in their different capacities through fostering practices that are flexible and that respond to various local needs.
Regulatory Frameworks for Social Farming
Social, agricultural activities are presented according to different rules of regulation that are specialized and community-based. They mainly influence the institution and the product of people’s activities and different methods of stakeholder relationships in the organization of projects as well as in the development and reallocation of social and economic value. The rules and regulatory procedures mainly involve the principles of a subsidiary, co-production, and the civic economy process (Kinsella et al., 2014). Subsidiary includes limited government interference, which requires the state to maintain its responsibilities and strategies to encourage actively private participation while monitoring and seeking to solve difficulties that are associated with various services and social concerns. The co-production process involves co-development of services through different sources and users and the creation of social and economic values such as social inclusion and food to design both private and public products that will be sold as well as improved social inclusion for the rural society. Similarly, the civic economy process includes fresh attitudes that rely on responsibility and the capability to involve public values in developing economical processes. Similarly the trust and development of new networks such as consumer networks and development of markets that are founded on reputation (Van Elsen et al., 2014).  ...Download file to see next pagesRead More