The Development of Private Police Forces: A Challenging Concern - Term Paper Example

The Development of Private Police Forces: A Challenging Concern Contents 0 Introduction 2 2.0 What is Fragmentation 3 3.0 Fragmentation of Police: Pros and Cons 4 4.0 Growth Trend in Private Police Industry 5 5.0 Rise in Fragmentation of Policing: A Logical Analysis 7 6.0 The Private Security Agency: An Organizational Analysis 8 7.0 Rising Trend 9 8.0 Reasons for Development of Private Security Industry: A Summary 9 9.0 Conclusion 11 10.0 References 12 15 The Development of Private Police Forces: A Challenging Concern 1.0 Introduction The developing of private police forces is a point of concern for the governments which are operating in all parts of the world (Jennings, 2008). The challenge is needed to be surmounted because it is the source of undermining people’s rid in any country. The governments are supposedly working in the role of capitalists’ assistant (Kavanagh, 2006). The political leadership needs the helping hand of economic powers before funding their campaigns and when they remain successful in occupying the posts then they have payback their sponsors with facilitating them in terms of achieving their goals and objectives (Avant, 2005). The trend of population’s growth has made it difficult for the police to serve and protect businesses from harm and therefore, corporations are known to hire their own private officials who are responsible for protecting businesses’ properties (Waard, 1999) and lives of their employees and executives are also safeguarded by private security officials. The trend of hiring private professionals for spying is historical in nature. However, the character of Sherlock Holmes was created out of the conditions and personal experiences of private detectives. The core cause of private security is related to failure of governments in providing security to corporations (Brantingham, 2011). Nevertheless, security is not an issue here but the demonstration of power is because businessmen want their competitors to know that they can harm them through the group of “thugs” that a particular industrialist own. Additionally, humans are power hungry creatures and they love to feel cocky and important in the society. The growth of private security industry has to do more with the psychological need of feeling empowered rather than anything else in the world. On the other hand, growing level of unemployment has caused ethics to decline and people are willing to do others’ “dirty work” in order to make a living (Allen, 2010). The development and growth of private armies is caused by plighted factors of any society and when individual grows formidable to an extent where the surrounding community gets weak in comparison to them. The economic power breeds political one and the governments have to control flow of money by active and effective system of taxation so that rich does not get rich enough to a level where he or she can afford an army. Finally, politicians have to serve the public instead of their powerful well wishers to control the demon of private police. 2.0 What is Fragmentation The term fragmentation refers to a phenomenon that involves breaking of something into smaller pieces and same is the case with the policing because the service sector is breaking up into enormous subunits with the passage of time. However, police was a traditional scheme of governments in the past but now it is getting more privatised in nature (Arden, 1998). Under socialism, governments were responsible for safeguarding public interests. The privatisation of key societal departments can be considered a bitter consequence of democratic system in that the people can do whatever they want to in the name of freedom (Ashworth, 2011). The socialistic and democratic mechanisms have to be submerged in order to create an effective governance system in the modern era of the 21st century. The governmental system is based on the notion of “social contract” that is based on the principle of fulfillment of mutual expectations of government and people (Rousseau, 1762). The governments tend to work for improving quality of life in the country against payment of taxes from the public. However, by letting the industries of private security unleash, the governments of developing and developed nations are not holding their part of the bargain with the public (Bennet, 1986). They are indeed promoting the psyche of hunters and gatherers in the societies which are presumably considered as the most advanced ones on the face of the earth. The rich will have security, justice and higher quality of life while the poor will be left to wander the streets (Møller, 1998). The governments are becoming intensively contented with playing the role of bystanders. It is particularly painful to admit the fact that governments are merely running back-offices of international companies that are even allowed the luxury of having a private army of highly trained men and women. The power distribution is clearly disturbed in the world and people have succumbed to the system which appreciates illegal moneymaking and everyone is looking to make an extra buck (Easton, 2013). The list of culprit parties is lengthy but it is sufficed to say that men and women from every circle of life are riding the same boat (Erickson & Vitacco, 2012). The cycle of corruption initiates from the top most ranks of the community and goes down to its very roots. The entrepreneurial adventurers do not believe in the governmental power to uphold the law and order situation and therefore, they grow their own armies (Locke, 1689). Nevertheless, it is not the entire picture because companies want to hide their filthy practices from law enforcement and that is why, they blame the government for being inefficient. The politicians on the other hand, are bound to entertain their sponsors’ wishes by keeping their hands off the table and thusly, balance of power shifts towards the wealthy. 3.0 Fragmentation of Police: Pros and Cons Fragmentation of policing has deeper consequences than its benefits to the society. The commercial strength is growing and companies can literally do whatever they want to (Byrne & Strobi, 2004). However, the cons side is heavier than that the pros when it comes down to weighing them in relation to private policing. The private police are expected to operate under national law enforcement agencies but this rarely happens in the practical world (Boddewyn & Brewer, 1994). The detainees in holding cells of private police do not get to reporting and therefore, they die out in the darkness caused by long shadows of international companies. The benefits of private policing are more of personal and private nature but its costs are societal and general in their definitions (Graham, 2002). The concept justice and law have also become privitised with the passage of time. The private security is getting into the shape of commercial warfare where companies are plotting and scheming to hurt their competitors via deploying their security units. The governments have to intervene on an immediate basis so that the notion of justice can be reinstated in the societies of the world. The economic power must be reduced by inducing the investors in pouring their money in lucrative market opportunities. The problem of private security is severe in developing nations where legal frameworks are known to be weak in terms of upholding the quality of justice. The strengthened businessmen have the option and freedom of acquiring a group of people who can do everything against the belief of getting paid in the future. The police and judicial systems must supersede the operations and jurisdiction of private security agencies (Griffiths & Kirkham, 2013). The secret of controlling the demon of private security lies in lessening the dependability of political campaigns which are run in order to win seats in the parliament. The traditional tactics of campaigning must be replaced with modern ones and social media’s use in this regard should be enhanced in order to cause a drop down regarding costs of the moments. In this way, political system of the countries can be freed from hijacking of corporate world and the private security agencies can be broken down by taking decisive action against them (Peffley & Hurwitz, 2011). Nevertheless, the solution of the featured problem lies in introducing some acceptable degree of socialism in order to help the government in regaining control of some key areas of the communities. 4.0 Growth Trend in Private Police Industry The growth in private police industry is growing with leaps and bounds because of increasing sense of insecurity in the elite class of developing and developed nations. The developing nations house 10% to 15% of upper social class while developed has that ratio in the range of 3% to 5% of the total population. However, the emergent markets are facing this problem with more severity and the developed nations are currently working in order to uproot the fashion of private security. Additionally, private police is used to provide security to corporate leaders and their properties but general public of developed nations is profoundly aware of their basic and fundamental rights (Drake, Aos, & Mller, 2009) and therefore, they do not undermine themselves with overpowered presence of private security. Furthermore, law enforcement is working significantly with regards to controlling crimes in the local cities and because of this reason, private security has to conform to legal requirements of certain nations (Franko, Tolbert, & Witko, 2013). Nevertheless, developing and under developed nations do not have strong judicial framework and therefore, private security has the freedom of engaging in activities that are highly illegal and unethical in nature. The public has the ultimate authority of challenging the presence of private security in their localities before governments can move into the equation to increase quality of issues (Goold, 2003). The public has to take charge in order to better the implementation of existing laws. The laws in developing and developed economies are same but the real flaw exists in relevance with the implementation (Halliday, 1995). The public has to come on roads and streets in order to highlight the problems that they face in their daily lives. Once public will communicate clearly that they are against private security then the government will have to move in so that things can be improved on. The nation is made of civilians and they are the key stakeholders of governmental initiatives but with the advent of privatised security, a shift in prioritisation of governments is occurring and they are exerting their efforts in order to facilitate the achievement of capitalistic goals and objectives (Hardt, 2010). Majority of the national systems are transforming to commercial entities that seek their competitive advantage all the time and countries are known to operate under the philosophical dimensions of Marxism so they are not at fault when they have to work to provide increased and enhance safety to those who are rich and less in number as well (Shaw, 2009). 5.0 Rise in Fragmentation of Policing: A Logical Analysis Joining law enforcement agencies was a dream of every child in the past but with the passage of time that charm was lost by the image of a police officer who presented righteousness and justice in the eyes of general public (Cheurprakobkit, 2001). The strengthened presence of information technology helped spreading knowledge about corrupt practices of police and therefore, people are not willing to join the police force. The profession is notorious for being underpaid and dangerous in nature when people imagine themselves tracing and coming face to face with the worst kind of criminals (Spitler, jones, Hawkins, & Dudka, 1987). The profession of private security is safer than the traditional one because of less exposure to risk of losing one’s life. Furthermore, the companies pay higher than the average prevalent wages in the society. The domain of private security is however reserved for retirees of armed forces and therefore, it is advisable for the governments to develop attractive retirement plans if they ever get interested in the idea of putting the issue of private security at rest (Wollmann, 2000). The trend of unemployment has grown into a significant challenge for the governmental regimes that are currently operating in all parts of the world. The unemployed faction of the society becomes so desperate for making a living that they prefer to be a private thug rather than being hungry on the street. The private security officials are working in the infamous field of work out of fear of being a failure in terms of meeting their basic needs of life (Seeley, 1992). No one is going to be a hooligan willingly but everyone has reason for being what they are and private security officials are no different in this regard as well. The solution to the problem of unprecedented growth in private security agencies can be found in the application of economics and education (Boulton & Panizzon, 1998). The costs of education must be brought down in order to aid the people in getting professional training in respectful ways of earning a living then interest rates should cut down so that business activities and investment can be supported which will eventually create jobs and perhaps, public will have less and less reason to take up a duty of a thug for making a living when they have other honest and respected sources of income at their disposal (Brookfield, 2009). 6.0 The Private Security Agency: An Organizational Analysis The private security agency has been found to be a tall organization with higher degree of bureaucracy and usually, lower ranks of the organization do not have any effective ideas about the identity of their employers (Child, 1972). They receive orders of all kinds and sorts and they have to act upon them without asking any questions. The private security official is a name given to a legalised version of a killing machine that has been allotted a license to serve the legal and illegal purposes of his or her employer with the use of whatever means and resources necessary (Dann & Haddow, 2008). The private security officials often have to operate in dark and they do not have any moral justification and context in the support of their actions except the lousy fact that they were “following orders” of the superiors they never knew (Baldoni, 2003). The enlightened world of the 21st century does not allow blind follow-ship of orders without making an analysis of their ethical and legal costs. The catastrophe of “Holocaust” was also justified as a series of choices made due to an external pressure. However, the growing concern about operations of security agencies is indeed an important evidence in supporting the presumption that the world is becoming a better place to live after people are initiating to realise the heart and soul of law which requires everyone of us to evaluate his or her actions in the light of ethics (Szasz, 1958) and law which private security officials are not allowed to do and therefore, they indulge themselves into actions which are extremely hazardous for the surrounding society. The organizations are also blackmailing criminals into service under the condition that they have to do whatever they are asked to and their safety from law enforcers is guaranteed. In this way, the freedom of holders of questionable past is being guaranteed and therefore, human civilizations are getting polluted with the actions of criminal hands and minds. The development of private security is the height of “white collar crimes” because it allows the elite class to get their dirty work done without getting their clothes and names stained (Braithwaite, 1999). 7.0 Rising Trend The rise in private security is just a logical consequence of unemployment and another factor which is contributing towards aggravation of the problem is lessening commitment towards ethical and legal standards of the societies (Crisp & Tumer, 2007). The people are only interested in making money (Nueno & Quelch, 1998) and they are not bothered with the illegality of the process (Cecchetti, 2006). The dropping morality in humans is causing them to become private security officials so that they can have penalty of funds to have a luxurious life (Hensen & Wanke, 2011). 8.0 Reasons for Development of Private Security Industry: A Summary The developing of private police forces is a point of concern for the governments which are operating in all parts of the world. The challenge is needed to be surmounted because it is the source of undermining people’s rid in any country. The political leadership needs the helping hand of economic powers before funding their campaigns. The trend of population’s growth has made it difficult for the police to serve and protect businesses from harm and therefore, corporations are known to hire their own private officials who are responsible for protecting businesses’ properties. The core cause of private security is related to failure of governments in providing security to corporations. Humans are power hungry creatures and they love to feel cocky and important in the society. The development and growth of private armies is caused by plighted factors of any society. The economic power breeds political one and the governments have to control flow of money by active and effective system of taxation so that rich does not get rich enough to a level where he or she can afford an army. Police was a traditional scheme of governments in the past but now it is getting more privatized in nature. Under socialism, governments were responsible for safeguarding public interests. The privatisation of key societal departments can be considered a bitter consequence of democratic system in that the people can do whatever they want to in the name of freedom. The socialistic and democratic mechanisms have to be submerged in order to create an effective governance system. By letting the industries of private security unleash, the governments of developing and developed nations are not holding their part of the bargain with the public. They are indeed promoting the psyche of hunters and gatherers in the societies which are presumably considered as the most advanced ones on the face of the earth. The rich will have security, justice and higher quality of life while the poor will be left to wander the streets. The governments are becoming intensively contented with playing the role of bystanders. The list of culprit party is lengthy but it is sufficed to say that men and women from every circle of life are riding the same boat. The entrepreneurial adventurers do not believe in the governmental power to uphold the law and order situation and therefore, they grow their own armies. The politicians on the other hand, are bound to entertain their sponsors’ wishes by keeping their hands off the table (Boddewyn & Brewer, 1994). The private security is getting into the shape of commercial warfare where companies are plotting and scheming to hurt their competitors via deploying their security units. The problem of private security is severe in developing nations where legal frameworks are known to be weak in terms of upholding the quality of justice. The police and judicial systems must supersede the operations and jurisdiction of private security agencies. The secret of controlling the demon of private security lies in lessening the dependability of political campaigns which are run in order to win seats in the parliament. 9.0 Conclusion This paper has been written in order to highlight the true nature of private security that had grown considerably in the past few years. The corporations and their heads are feeling the experience of being accompanied by guards who are fully equipped with state of the art weapons. The core phenomenon is not about feeling secured but cocky and proud. So private security is a psychological weapon used to mesmerise one’s competitors and enemies. The governments are fully capable of providing security to each of the citizen at least is the case with developed nations. Having private security is more like brutalising a female or socially weak person in order to feel empowered and that is all there in the minds of those business tycoons but they do not admit it. 10.0 References Allen, R. 2010. Modeling Criminal Law. Law and Philosophy Vol 29 No.4, 469-481. Arden, M. 1998. Modernising Legislation. Public Law Vol 1 No 1, 65-76. Ashworth, A. 2011. Ignorance of the Criminal Law, and Duties to Avoid it. The Modern Law Review Vol 74 No 1, 1-26. Avant, D. 2005. Private security companies. New Political Economy Vol 10 No.1, 121-131. Baldoni, J. 2003. Great Communication Secrets of Great Leaders. McGraw-Hill, New York. Bennet, J. 1986. Information Technology and Law Enforcement. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences Vol 18 No.4, 115-126. Boddewyn, J., & Brewer, T. 1994. International-Business Political Behavior: New Theoretical Directions. Academy of Management Review Vol 19 No.1, 119-143. Boulton, A., & Panizzon, D. 1998. The knowledge explosion in science education: Balancing practical and theoretical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching Vol 35 No. 5, 475–481. Braithwaite, J. 1999. Restorative Justice: Assessing Optimistic and Pessimistic Accounts. Crime and Justice Vol 25 No. 1, 1-127. Brantingham, P. 2011. Computational Criminology. Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference, 45-78. Brookfield, S. 2009. International Handbook of Education for the Changing World of Work. Springer Link, New York. Byrne, D., & Strobi, E. 2004. Defining unemployment in developing countries: evidence from Trinidad and Tobago. Journal of Development Economics Vol 73 No.1, 465–476. Cecchetti, S. G. 2006. Money, Banking and Financial Markets. McGraw Hill International, London. Cheurprakobkit, S. 2001. Police Performance: A Model for Assessing Citizens Satisfaction and the Importance of Police Attributes. Police Quarterly Vol 4 No.4, pp.449-468. Child, J. 1972. Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice. Sociology 6 No.1, 1-22. Crisp, R., & Tumer, R. 2007. Essential Social Psychology. Sage Publication, Auckland. Dann, G. E., & Haddow, N. 2008. Just Doing Business or Doing Just Business: Google, Microsoft, Yahoo! and the Business of Censoring China’s Internet. Journal of Business Ethics Vol 79 No.3, 219-234. Drake, E., Aos, S., & Mller, M. (2009). Evidence-Based Public Policy Options to Reduce Crime and Criminal Justice Costs: Implications in Washington State. Victims & Offenders: An International Journal of Evidence-based Research, Policy, and Practice, pp.170-196. Easton, S. (2013). Protecting Prisoners The Impact of International Human Rights Law on the Treatment of Prisoners in the United Kingdom. The Prison Journal Vol 93 (4), pp.475-492. Erickson, S., & Vitacco, M. (2012). Predators and punishment. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law Vol 18 no 1, 1-17. Franko, W., Tolbert, C. J., & Witko, C. (2013). Inequality, Self-Interest, and Public Support for “Robin Hood” Tax Policies. Political Research Quarterly Vol 66 (4), 923-937. Goold, B. (2003). Public Area Surveillance and Police Work: the impact of CCTV on police behaviour and autonomy. Surveillance & Society Vol 1 (2), pp.191-203 . Graham, R. (2002). A Unified theory of statutory interpretation. Statute Law Review Vol 23 no 2, 91-105. Griffiths, A., & Kirkham, M. (2013). Law for Non-Lawyers . New York: Google. Halliday, F. (1995). The Empires Strike Back? Russia, Iran and the New Republics. The World Today Vol 51 (11), 220-222. Hardt, M. (2010). The Common in Communism. Rethinking Marxism: A Journal of Economics, Culture & Society 22, 3, 346-356. Hensen, J., & Wanke, M. (2011). The abstractness of luxury. Journal of Economic Psychology 32,6, 789–796. Jennings, M. (2008). Foundations of the Legal Environment of Business. New York: Cengage Learning. Kavanagh, A. (2006). The role of parliamentary intention in adjudication under the human rights Act. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies Vol 26 no 1, 179-190. Locke, J. (1689). Two Treatises of Government. Awnsham Church: London. Møller, V. (1998). Quality of Life in South Africa: Post-Apartheid Trends. Social Indicators Research 43,1, 27-68. Nueno, J. L., & Quelch, J. A. (1998). The mass marketing of luxury. Business Horizons, 41(6), 61–68. Peffley, M., & Hurwitz, J. (2011). Justice in America: The Separate Realities of Blacks and Whites. The Journal of Politics Vol 73 (3), pp 961-962. Rousseau, J.-J. (1762). The social contract. Berkshire: Swan Sonnenschein & Co. Seeley, E. (1992). Human needs and consumer economics: the implications of Maslows theory of motivation for consumer expenditure patterns. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 21(4), 303–324. Shaw, W. H. (2009). Marxism, Business Ethics, and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics Vol 84 (4), 565-576. Spitler, D., jones, G., Hawkins, J., & Dudka, K. (1987). Body composition and physiological characteristics of law enforcement officers. British Journal of Sports Medicine Vol 21 (1), pp.154-157. Szasz, T. (1958). Psychiatry, Ethics, and the Criminal Law. Columbia Law Review Vol 58 (2), pp. 183-198. Waard, J. (1999). The Private Security Industry in International Perspective. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research Vol 7 (2), pp.143-174. Wollmann, H. (2000). Local government systems: from historic divergence towards convergence? Great Britain, France, and Germany as comparative cases in poin. Government and Policy Vol 18 no. 1, 33 – 55 . Read More