Download file to see previous pages...
Family roles are distributed among husbands and wives depending on their characteristics. Husbands have instrumental characteristics which lead them to take paid jobs outside the home while wives have expressive characteristics which lead them to take domestic work and childcare.
Marxist approach of the family suggests that socialization within the family and outside the family leads to the transmission of the ideologies of the ruling class so that individuals will accept the capitalist system. It is also concerned with the increased privatization of the family so that it causes concentration of family concerns and orthodox interests.
In this case, the Parson and Marxist approaches differ from each other because the Parson approach suggests that family functions are taken by other social institutions while the Marxists suggest that the family takes up all social functions and political interests from the ruling class. In this case, the Marxists tend to suggests that social functions are transmitted into the family while the Parson’s approach suggests that social functions are transmitted out of the family. According to the Parson’s approach, children are taught to accept the authorities of their parents while in Marxist approach socializing children to accept authority leads to adverse
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
In this entire analysis we have attempted to assess the family criteria under the different stage development and the internal structure with power balance and value. According to Hagan, Gills and Simpson, power control theory is the composition of class with control which influences the family pattern and the gender differences issues in the family.
He regarded that it was a product of capitalist production since individuals had happened to be estranged from the set of people, things and events that these individuals were usually accustomed with, however, as an effect of the system in the modern society, their relations to others would be not as deep as the normal.
For Marx, alienation was when an individual had felt the estrangement from his society as well as its other aspects for the reason that the individual could not avoid the losing of such control of their lives because under the capitalist system, he could no longer have the power over his work.
In that context, if I speak of my family, I simply have no idea of my biological family and for me family life primarily happened to be shuffling from many foster homes and shelters. Yet, I am proud to say that I made the best of what providence gifted to me and have been immensely successful in developing a balanced and poised personality.
Though not very limited, the research in India is comparatively less, with few of the authors and publishers like, Sudipt Dutta, and Radhakrishnan. However, after the recent disintegration of the vital family firm groups, very little literature was available on the factors causing the recurrence of such follow up.
While functionalism provides a consensus perspective, Marxism and feminism provide a conflict perspective. Each of the perspectives focuses on the family as central to society, and each differently interprets the relationship between social change and the family (Bond,
This theory suggests that there exist a broad inequality in the society that only seems to favor those with power and wealth. Under this theory, those with power and wealth use their power to seize control over the poor. The
Qualitative techniques are essential in solving some types of questions. Data analysis involves the inspection, transforming and modeling data with the aim of getting useful information. The data analysis process is highly adequate because of
2 Pages(500 words)Coursework
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Coursework on topic Compare parson functionalist and Marxist analyses of the family for FREE!