Environmental Campaign in South Carolina - Research Paper Example

Environmental Campaign in South Carolina al Affiliation Environmental Campaign in South Carolina Many issues affect environmentalistsin South Carolina. For example, a relaxation of the rules that regulated Fraking means necessary elements such as water resources are in danger of pollution. In addition, global warming threatens marine life for many local species, such as the turtles (Moore, 2013). The environmental campaign in South Carolina seeks to increase knowledge about the adverse effects of degradation and gather support for measures that are friendly to the environment.

The following paper will examine the problems faced during the campaign.The environmental campaign has problems with partnerships. Due to the need for cash and platforms to reach members of the public, the campaign always needs to have partners and sponsors. However, environmental issues affect most of the partners in a negative manner. For example, all the stakeholders in the oil industry are affected by the propositions of environmental conservation in a negative manner. Therefore, they cannot support these forums.

In addition, there are members of the local community who disagree with some of the propositions. For example, Fraking is a source of income for many people. These people agree with the practice because they believe the safety measures adopted are enough to safeguard the environment. Therefore, they are in direct conflict with advocates for abolition of fracking from the area because in their view, it is merely a method to exploit limited natural resources (Hammond, 2013). Other such conflicts of interest affect the environmental campaign.

In any campaign, there are always efforts to increase the knowledge of the target population in order to win new supporters. In South Carolina, the environmental campaign has a goal of educating the local people into the benefits of conservation and the threats posed by continued degradation. However, the campaign for the cultivation of knowledge is problematic. For instance, there has been a significant level of exposure to environmental issues in the recent past (Hammond, 2013). The people now feel like they know everything about the campaigns.

Consequently, few people are interested in forums that seek to increase environmental knowledge. In addition, there is the issue of having excellent platforms to raise environmental issues. As this paper will later evaluate, these platforms have become the targets of double politicians. Capital requirements for the awareness campaign also add a burden to the campaigns. In the contemporary times, environmental awareness has emerged as among the most attractive political appeals for a politician.

Politicians who demonstrate a willingness to adopt environmentally friendly measures to attract many people to their course. The attraction creates a conflict of interest because campaign funding by corporate donors creates a sense of debt to campaign funders. In fact, one of the motivating reasons behind the existence of laws requiring full disclosure of campaign funding is to show the public a clear picture of supporters of a particular campaign and thus facilitate logical and sound choices.

However, there are issues with campaign disclosures in South Carolina. The implication is that politicians have the ability to represent different faces to different people to win an election and thus create a conflict of interest upon election (Hutchins, 2012). This phenomenon, called double politics, is a major issue in the environmental conservation efforts in South Carolina because it misleads the people into electing leadership that has little concern for their well-being (Hammond, 2013).

For example, the issue of Fraking, where limited oil reservoirs are exploited a risk of causing major environmental upsets, has seen significant reduction in policies fracking, resulting in an increased vulnerability of the environment in South Carolina. Therefore, double politics poses a significant threat to environmental conservation efforts. In conclusion, the environmental campaign in South Carolina is faced by multiple issues. Most of these issues, including solidarity and double-politics, arise because of a conflict of interest.

However, if all people were to commit to the environment, there would be few problems regarding conservation efforts and most of the conflicts would be non-existent. ReferencesHammond, T. (2013, April 16). Green Issue 2013: Sustainability Guide. Free Times. Retrieved June 17, 2014, from http://www.free-times.com/cover/green-issue-2013-sustainability-guideHutchins, C. (2012, March 19). A campaign finance free-for-all in South Carolina. Center for Public Integrity. Retrieved June 17, 2014, from http://www.

publicintegrity.org/2012/06/15/9144/campaign-finance-free-all-south-carolinaMoore, E. (2013, April 16). Climate Change Could Dramatically Affect South Carolina, Says State Natural Resources Agency. Free Times. Retrieved June 17, 2014, from http://www.free-times.com/cover/climate-change-could-dramatically-affect-south-carolina-says-state-natural