Coalition Government - Essay Example

Coalition Government Contents Introduction 3 Features of four of the Coalition Government’s welfare reforms 3 Points in favour of these four reforms 5 Criticism of the reforms 9 Conclusion 11 References 13 Introduction England is historically renowned for public spending. It is truly a welfare state. However from 1970s and to be precise from the time of ex Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, government policy started to favor privatization and reduction of welfare expenditure. The trend continued in 1990s and the current policy change is in the same tune as well (Freedland, 2013). Britains first formal coalition since World War II has been working exceedingly well, under the guidance and leadership of Mr. David Cameron, with positive intent, setting up severity measures and managing unassuming financial development (Parkinson, 2012). All the earnest warnings given before the general race, especially by the Conservatives and by the press, in the possibility of a coalition being riotous and untidy was proved wrong in course of time (HM Government, 2010). The key features of four of the coalition government’s reform measures for wellbeing are discussed in the next sections. Features of four of the Coalition Government’s welfare reforms Bed Room Tax Bedroom Tax or Spare Room Subsidy is a tax enforced by the government to initiate a change in Housing Benefit Entitlement. This tax confers that someone living in a housing association or council property with one or more spare bedrooms would receive less housing benefit. If this loss of benefit is considered as penalty then for one spare bedroom the concerned individual would be subjected to 14% reduction in housing benefit and for two spare bedrooms the same would account for 25% reduction of the housing benefit (Shelter, 2014). This new charge will began influencing lands with extra couch rooms in April 2013 (Worcester City Council, 2013; TCPA, 2011). HousingBenefit The Household Benefit Cap is another important part of the Welfare Reform Act and will put a utmost on the aggregate sum of profit that can be received by us. Under the Act, Housing Benefit criteria now give consideration over the amount of rooms and number of individuals involving a property and confine installments to take into account one room for every individual or for every couple (National Housing Federation, 2014). The principle applies to inhabitants in neighborhood power (gathering) and Housing Association settlement (the standard at that point was to set up for private lodging occupants before the 2012 act) and various exceptions apply: all youngsters under 10 of age are required to impart a room; kids under 16 of the same sex anticipated that will impart; and careers of debilitated inhabitants who necessity to stay overnight are allowed to have one additional bedroom. Housing Benefit is to be offered under the Universal Credit plan (National Housing Federation, 2014). Child benefit The chancellor mellowed the withdrawal of tax profit from higher rate citizens. From January 2013 there will be no misfortune of kid profit until at least one guardian acquires £50,000, after which the profit will be steadily recovered by a climbing duty to £60,000, after which the family will quit getting the profit whatsoever (Dominiczak, 2013). Under the new framework 90% of families, around 750,000 family units, might keep on receiving kid profit, he said (Martin, 2012).The new measures evacuate the tragic "cliff edge" which implied that someone procuring £1 over the edge might lose about £1,750 a year for two kids, and the apparent shamefulness that two individuals gaining right underneath the limit could in any case assert everything (Hope, 2012). Personal Independence Payment Any singular at present gaining Disability Living Allowance will be having it displaced with another profit called Personal Independence Payment or PIP.Particular Independence Payment / PIP has been intended to be less demanding to comprehend than DLA and has been made to help towards the additional expenses which may happen when having a long haul condition (long haul implies sick health or an inability that is required to keep going for 12 months or more). PIP will be made up of two segments: a Daily Living Component and a Mobility segment. Both of these rates have a standard and an upgraded rate. When a case needs to be made, one would be asked to finish a structure and depict how his/her condition influences him/her and one might need to take help from health expert who might furnish data for the case. One might be asked to go to a face- to-face health / work fitness evaluation. Utilizing the data that has been furnished, the DWP will then utilize a Personal Independence Payment number cruncher to figure what amount remuneration will be granted to the individual (Bromford, 2014) Points in favour of these four reforms The benefits of these four above mentioned and discussed topics are given as under:- Benefits of Bedroom tax The Household Benefit Cap will take off in two stages relying upon where someone lives. The top will begin to be taken off in July and will be completely set up by September 2013. Most ranges will have the Household Benefit Cap set up from July 2013, however in Birmingham, Walsall and Sandwell Benefit Cap may begin from August 2013 (Wilson, 2013, p.31). The Household Benefit Cap will be set up for all families influenced by September 2013. Since 1 April 2013, new lodging profit tenets mean that someone would not have the ability to get lodging benefit to pay for the sum of their rent if the home has spare rooms. This is constantly called the bedroom tax’; however letters from the board may call it size criteria’, under-occupation or under-occupancy rules (Shelter, 2014). Assuming that one is a board or lodging cooperation inhabitant of working age accepting lodging profit and leasing a home that has a larger number of rooms than one would require, the person’s housing benefits will likely be decreased. Beneficiaries asserting lodging profit wont be influenced. The number of rooms is dependent upon the amount of individuals living in your home? When one has a bigger number of rooms than the new governs say you require, the individual will be dealt with as under-occupying your home. He/she will get less of your rent paid for by lodging profit. Assuming that housing benefit will not take care of his/her rent; one will pay whatever is left of the rent by himself/herself (National Housing Federation, 2014). This must be paid specifically to one’s proprietor. When benefits have been evaluated his/her neighborhood power may make him/her aware of the conclusion - anyway they may not be obliged to do along these lines, so one might as well contact them to figure out - generally one’s cash could diminish without any alert. The top will be set at the normal net profit for a working family. This is situated to be £500 for every week for solitary folks and couples with or without kids and £350 for every week for single individuals without kid (Shipman, 2013). The bedroom tax would not influence if somebody (or their accomplice) reaches state pension credit age. (On 1 April 2013, when the room charge began, they might have arrived at state annuity credit age in the event that they were of 61 years and 6 months.) (Age.uk, 2013) Absolutions from the diminishment of housing benefits for families with additional rooms apply to individuals living in gifted or possessed lands, individuals living in convoys, trailers and houseboats, individuals living in a few sorts of upheld settlement, vagrants housed in interim convenience gave by the board (unless it is claimed by the gathering). One would not be permitted to claim housing benefit for additional rooms that are utilized for youngsters having divorced or separated parents; couples who use separate rooms due to ailment or inability, rooms utilized by debilitated grown-ups to store medicinal supplies (Murie, 2012). Housing benefits From 15 July 2013 the Government will put a breaking point on the aggregate sum of benefits/ privilege that working age individuals can get. This implies that families earning would not accept more in profits than the national normal compensation (£26,000 a year) paid to the individuals who are meeting the requirements (Andrew, 2013). The aggregate sum of profit payable will be restricted to a maximum of £500 every week for couples and £350 for single individuals (Highland Council, 2013). However privilege to certain different profits incorporating Working Tax Credit, Disability Living Allowance (Personal Independence Payment from April 2013 – see later), Constant Attendance Allowance, and war dowagers and war widowers’ installments will be absolved from the Household Benefit (Wakefield council, 2013). The benefits like “Jobseekers Allowance, Employment Support Allowance, Housing Benefit, Child Benefit, Child Tax Credit, Careers Allowance, Bereavement Allowance, Widowed Parents Allowance, Incapacity Benefit, Income Support, Jobseeker’s Allowance, Maternity Allowance, Severe Disablement Allowance (SDA) and Widow’s Pensionwill come under Housing benefits”(Disability Rights, 2014). Child benefit Child Benefit is worth £20.30 a week for the first kid and £13.40 a week for each kin. Just about 400,000 individuals with higher salaries quit of accepting Child Benefit before the charge was presented. HMRC said these individuals dont have to make any further move. According to Lin Homer, chief executive of HMRC, "HMRC is committed to helping people pay the right amount of tax. If you have had certain changes to your income in the last year, including those affected by the changes to Child Benefit, you have until October 5 to register for self assessment” (Blackmore, 2013). One can get Child Benefit regardless of the fact that his ward does not live with him or her, as long as one pays towards their upkeep, what one pays is in any event the same as the measure of Child Benefit, the individual the kid lives with is not getting Child Benefit for them, assuming that the individual and an alternate individual both claim Child Benefit for the same youngster, one and only can get it. Kid Benefit installments typically stop when the youngsters reach 16, unless they are in training or preparing that means Child Benefit. One cant get Child Benefit for youngsters once they achieve the age of 20. Training means Child Benefit when it is full-time, non-praiseworthy instruction. The youngster necessities to have begun, selected or been acknowledged onto a course that tallies before their nineteenth birthday. Full-time implies that, on normal, more than 12 hours a week in term time is used on“Tuition, Practical work, supervised study, taking exams, Work experience if its part of the childs course of education” (HMRC, 2013). It does not include breaks for meals and homework.Non-advanced education includes the “GCSEs, A levels, International GCSEs (IGCSEs), Pre-U, International Baccalaureate, NVQ/SVQ level 1, 2 or 3, BTEC, National Certificate and 1st Diploma, SCE higher grade or similar, Traineeships as part of 16-19 Study Program in England” (HM Revenue & Customs,2013). An individual or his/her accomplice could be obligated to an assessment charge called the High Income Child Benefit charge’. (HM Revenue & Customs, 2013). As opposed to paying the assessment charge, a person or his or her accomplice could have chosen not to gain Child Benefit installments. (HM Revenue & Customs, 2013). Benefits of Personal Independence PaymentIndividual Independence Payment (PIP) will supplant Disability Living Allowance (DLA) from 2014 for qualified individuals of working age (16 to 64 years of age). PIP does not cover with profits, for example, Employment and Support Allowance or Jobseekers Allowance (PIP, 2014). Under the present welfare change suggestions, Attendance Allowance would not be influenced. The present passport game plans for DLA will be comprehensively supported under PIP. When one appropriates a specific rate of the Care or Mobility Component of DLA one might get access to certain benefits. The travel permit under PIP will be receipt of the proportional rate of the Daily Living or Mobility Components of PIP (PIP, 2014). Criticism of the reforms The diversified welfare reduction plan of the present coalition government would without any ambiguity reduce the burden of government considering public expenditure and might also make the system more efficient. Again the common people might become self reliant and more responsible of their own livelihood. As an example introducing added tax on excess room is a clear indication to the common people that they have to manage space in a more efficient way in this era of high level of urbanization. Keeping high rate taxpayers out of the welfare net is also a progressive decision. But there are certain concerns as well. Life is much more competitive nowadays and almost all the countries of the world are feeling the pressure of inflation. Real estate price has skyrocketed and for a common inhabitant it is difficult to manage without the help of the government. It is worth mentioning that such reduction in welfare benefit has nit been phased out and has come all of a sudden. At this juncture those people living at margin would definitely feel that their fallback position has worsened. This might also expose the entire country to a sudden catastrophe. Already reports regarding mismanagement of these reduction plans have been heard and criticisms are rampant in media. The dilemma between reduction in public expenditure and not exposing the people of England to risks would definitely haunt the government and keep the critics busy in coming time.       Components of the Welfare Reform Act 2012 have been subjected to discriminating examination in the UK Parliament and in the media (Pugalis & Townsend, 2013). Banter about the advancements related to Housing Benefit is raised on the under-inhabitance punishment. Spoilers have broadly alluded to the punishment as a "room duty", while government backers of the plan have utilized the expression "extra room subsidy” (Chapman, 2014). In Prime clergymans inquiries on 27 February 2013, Prime Minister David Cameron commented that the under-inhabitance punishment was not a manifestation of levy as it did not include deducting cash from particular income (House of Commons, 2013). Some media analysts have communicated sentiments that the benefit regulations may prompt an all inclusive lodging crisis, while others supporting the changes have taken the view that it will help to diminish UK welfare using a fairer redistribution of leased accommodation. Opponents of the new benefit principles have remarked on circumstances where occupants who are influenced by the under-inhabitance punishment will be compelled to move to more diminutive lands to abstain from losing cash, and have attracted thoughtfulness regarding a deficiency of lodging. The supporter of the bill, Iain Duncan Smith safeguarded the welfare changes with the contention that the new benefits framework might urge individuals to be in work and diminish packing whilst diminishing costs. The question of living on £53 for every week pulled in extensive media consideration; he made the case according to a protest by a segment of the general population in a phone meeting, who expressed that he was supplementing his low wage as a business broker with state profits and after profit cuts, he might need to live on £53 for every week. The precision of the guests record was later called into inquiry in the media. He said the IT issues that have tenacious widespread credit were associated with £2bn program that will group working-age profits into a solitary installment (Hern, 2013). According to him, “All IT programmes, let’s be honest, always have elements that get written off” (Parker & Neville, 2013). Duncan Smith condemned the more seasoned arrangement of incapacity profits which granted a stipend to inquirers with no further precise checks to evaluate if the petitioners condition had enhanced or exacerbated. Duncan Smith expressed that, by obliging petitioners to experience occasional evaluations, the framework could be focused at those most in necessity whilst forestalling installments being made to individuals who had recuperated from a brief disability (Hern, 2013; Parker & Neville, 2013). Conclusion One may conclude that the evaluation criteria were imperfect, and might cause undue hardship to vulnerable individuals and were emphatically concentrated on cutting welfare budgets (Elson, 2012). Work capacity appraisals completed by the private foreman Atos Healthcare were subjected to discriminating examination in Parliament taking after various disputable choices in which handicapped people were denied profits and needed to search for work. In a couple of cases, the people concerned were supposedly determined to commit suicide. References 1. Age.uk, 2013, Factsheet, available at: http://www.ageuk.org.uk/Documents/EN-GB/Factsheets/FS48_Pension_Credit_fcs.pdf?dtrk=true (accessed on February 12, 2014) 2. Andrew, A. 2013, Don’t put off until tomorrow what you can do today: When and how you should start saving for a pension, Mailonline, available at: http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/pensions/article-2391205/When-start-saving-pension.html (accessed on February 12, 2014) 3. Blackmore, N. 2014. Parents must act now to avoid Child Benefit tax trap. The Telegraph, Available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/consumertips/tax/10234048/Parents-must-act-now-to-avoid-Child-Benefit-tax-trap.html(accessed on February 12, 2014) 4. Broughton, K, Berkeley, N, & Jarvis, D 2013, Where next for neighbourhood regeneration in England? Two years on, Local Economy (Routledge), 28, 7/8, pp. 817-827, Business Source Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 7 February 2014. 5. Bromford, n.d.Personal Independence Payment / PIP. Available at http://www.bromford.co.uk/customer/welfare-reform/personal-independence-payments/ 6. Disability Rights 2014, Benefits Cap, available at: http://www.disabilityrightsuk.org/benefits-cap (accessed on February 12, 2014) 7. Dominiczak, P. 2013. Labour will not reverse Coalitions child benefit cuts. Available at http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/10099943/Labour-will-not-reverse-Coalitions-child-benefit-cuts.html 8. Elson, D 2012, The reduction of the UK budget deficit: a human rights perspective, International Review Of Applied Economics, 26, 2, pp. 177-190, Business Source Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 7 February 2014 9. Freedland, J. (2013) Margaret Thatchers Britain, The Guardian, available at: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/apr/08/britain-land-margaret-thatcher-built (accessed on February 13, 2014) 10. Hern, H. 2013, So, Iain Duncan Smith thinks he could live on £53 a week, New Statesman, available at: http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2013/04/so-iain-duncan-smith-thinks-he-could-live-53-week (accessed on February 12, 2014) 11. Highland Council, 2013, Important: Changes to Benefits which could affect you, available at: http://www.highland.gov.uk/livinghere/housing/howtogetmoreinformation/welfare-changes.htm (accessed on February 13, 2013) 12. Hope, C. 2012, Clegg admits changes to child benefit, The Telegraph, available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9123128/Clegg-admits-changes-to-child-benefit.html (accessed on February 12, 2014) 13. HM Government, 2010, The Coalition: our programme for government. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/78977/coalition_programme_for_government.pdf (accessed on February 13, 2014) 14. HM Revenue & Customs, n.d. Child Benefit if your child is in further education or training. Available at http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/childbenefit/keep-up-to-date/when-child-aged-16/further-education.htm (accessed on February 13, 2014) 15. House of Commons, 2013, Parliament.uk, available at: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmhansrd/cm130227/debtext/130227-0001.htm#13022775000009 (accessed on February 13, 2014) 16. Martin, 2012, Child Benefit Changes: What They Mean for your Finances, Money, available at: http://www.money.co.uk/article/1008590-child-benefit-changes-what-they-mean-for-your-finances.htm (accessed on February 12, 2014) 17. Murie, A 2012, The Next Blueprint for Housing Policy in England,Housing Studies, 27, 7, pp. 1031-1047, Business Source Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 7 February 2014. 18. National Housing Federation 2014, Benefit Cap, available at: http://www.housing.org.uk/policy/welfare-reform/benefit-cap/ (accessed on February 12, 2014) 19. PIP, 2014, Personal Independence Payment (PIP) – introduction, available at: http://www.nidirect.gov.uk/personal-independence-payment-introduction (accessed on February 12, 2014) 20. Parker, G. & Neville, S. 2013. Iain Duncan Smith says welfare reform on track to ‘change lives’ Available at http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/a6746894-5e86-11e3-a44c-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2sbQBTC5I (accessed on February 13, 2014) 21. Pugalis, L, & Townsend, A 2013, Rescaling of Planning and Its Interface with Economic Development, Planning Practice & Research, 28, 1, pp. 104-121, Business Source Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 7 February 2014. 22. Parkinson, J. 2012. Progress report: Constitutional reform. Available at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-16748163 (accessed on February 13, 2014) 23. Shipman, T. 2013, 1 in 4 facing a cut to their benefits has found work, Mail Online, available at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2308159/16-000-fewer-households-affected-benefits-cap-500-half-jobs-rest-moved-cheaper-houses.html (accessed on February 12, 2014) 24. Shelter, 2014. The bedroom tax. Available at https://england.shelter.org.uk/get_advice/housing_benefit_and_local_housing_allowance/changes_to_housing_benefit/bedroom_tax (accessed on February 13, 2014) 25. TCPA, 2011. policy analysis of housing and planning reform. Available at http://www.tcpa.org.uk/data/files/tcpa_jrfpolicyanalysis_final_report.pdf 26. Wakefield council, 2013. Household Benefit Cap. Available at http://www.wakefield.gov.uk/AdviceAndBenefits/BenefitChanges/HouseholdBenefitCap.htm (accessed on February 13, 2014) 27. Worcester City Council, 2013, Welfare Reform, available at: http://www.worcester.gov.uk/index.php?id=2698 (accessed on February 12, 2014) 28. Wilson, W. 2013, The Household Benefit Cap, House of Commons Read More