Discussion on How the Government Can Define Racial Categories - Essay Example

The methods applied in the situation, show that the strategy ensures that individuals' ability to make any conclusions concerning a certain group; beyond the method used to unify the group in the first place proves nil. Biologically, human beings inherit traits independently; this means that no one individual, will ever have an identifying trait of the other individual. The fact that an individual knows something about another does not guarantee the latter to make a second opinion of the group the individual originates.
Individuals, sometimes, lack the understanding that categorization proves cultural, and not scientific. Racial categorization experiences transformation basis owes the change to geographical and industrial relations. Brazil proves to have the most racial groups than the United States. In countries like Haiti, traces of European roots make an individual white. This proves that the methods of categorization vary with the groups involved (Wall, 98).

Definitions Best Help the Community Remedy Inequality
According to Katz (245), there appear various parallelisms pertaining to groups. There appears as no genetic material, mannerism, or features that discern all the associates of one race from the members of a different race. The social makeup of a society illuminates the discrepancies in the procedure used to define a group. The United States appears to have a different definition application to different racial and ethnic groups. The state terms anyone tribally affiliated to North and South America as American Indian or sometimes Alaskan Native. Asians refer to the people originally from the Far East, Southern Asia, or the Indian subcontinents. Individuals with relations from the African continents are referred to as Black or African Americans. The Mexicans, Puerto Rican, Central American and other Spanish-speaking populations are termed as Hispanic / Latino. Individuals from the pacific Islands or Hawaii, Guam, Samoa appear as, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islanders. The term white refers to individuals originating from Europe, the Middle East, or North Africans.

The terms creation occurs in 1997, through the civil rights regulations that discourage discrimination. The definitions ensure that different individuals are described differently. The individuals from Native Americans ensure tribal relations or accreditation of the community, a rare condition. African Americans indicate the black race; while there appears no other group mentioning race; countries of Spanish nature have been regarded as Hispanic which disregards their race. Human beings appear as mongrels, across the communities over the decades, an anthropologist, Alan Goodman, observes. Evolutionary biologists prove that all human beings come from the original African population. The verdict concerning human rates depends on an individual perspective; some can conclude that the human race is African race while others might view the human race as a mixed-race (Simon, 124).

Conclusion
The sorting process proves quite a task as the 2000 U.S Census tried to match and compile the census data with the preceding years. The practice concerned with attaching significance to all members of a community, though, helps unify different races, and it also possesses the ability to exhibit improper ideas. A perfect example sets in; when referring to an individual as partial, or half a certain race, yet genetics asserts that there appears no characteristic that distinguishes one race from the next. In the past, an individual with any affiliation by blood to the African ancestry was termed black; while American Indians requires proof to qualify as a member of the group. Historical analysis has appeared to challenge the Human race analysis (Wall, 109).