Download file to see previous pages...
The welfare recipients are not entitled to be tested for drugs under the constitution, thus it is against their human rights (Brieland, Costin, & Atherton, 1975).
The plan to test all welfare recipients should be opposed since it is going to be expensive to the government, thus burdening tax payers (Dora, n.d.). Drugs test imbursement is expensive and recent reports put the cost of testing one individual as ranging between $30 to $ 35. As much as they try to balance the calculations so that an individual using drugs is denied the money, it is assumed that the government will save up to $134 monthly. However, this is just an assumption that is not yet proven (Rubin & Babbie, 2012).
The law is among the bad ideas that are recycled time and again. First, this law has been put down in the courts before because the first amendment grants that every individual is secure in their houses and prisons. These arguments include that the government should benefit people’s drug habit. Another one argues that in times of tight budget, screening out the population of undeserving applicants could save the government lots of money (Freind, 2012). This is not right as people who are addicted to drugs need help. States like Taxes, which prides itself on being tough on crime, have come to the conclusion that it is cheaper to treat addicts than to lock them out. Some scholars argue that screening recipients for drug abuse is quite a cynical way of cutting short term costs (Ashman, 2012). According to Lubbers (2011), the problems associated with welfare are not brought about by the welfare, and the welfare program can be improved. However, punishing those in the Welfare program by introducing drug test to keep some of them out is not proper. Instead, supporting them even more will help, as it might help them escape circumstances that lead to higher drug use (Rick, William, &
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Canada is one of the countries in which same-sex marriage has been legalized. Other countries that have legalized same-sex marriages include Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and Belgium. This has spurred debate on whether same-sex marriages should or should not be banned and the debate has not reached any conclusion to date.
In 1930, the period of Great Depression in US economy, the US government started to think how to support the needy individuals and families. The government formed a welfare scheme to assist the residents of US. Then for
On the other hand one has to be responsible and affectionate to be a good parent and homosexuals have equal possibility of having these qualities as that of heterosexuals. Hence, if homosexuals have the core qualities that
It is in different forms in different countries guided by government policy and strategy. Based on the three political movements of the time, Danish sociologist Epsing-Adersen created a welfare regime typology. It was based on
At first I thought this was unnecessary and tedious; though, I soon realized how much it enhanced my own writing. Critically, listening to the remarks and suggestions made by my fellow classmates, I slowly realized how helpful their approach truly was.
Businesses have managed to expand and grow, reaching many untapped markets in different countries and regions because of these developments.
Globalization, as featured across various discussions, describes the international integration processes
Antiretroviral drug resistance in adult infected with HIV-1 is a worrying phenomenon. Testing the extent of resistance can lead to the development of a quality drug that can combat the virus from spreading. This would reduce the number of deaths due to the infection. Experimental results could lead to a better understanding of how the virus develops.
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Assignment on topic Debate arguing that welfare recipents should not be drug tested for FREE!