My position on whether welfare recipients should be drug tested to receive their benefits is that I am for drug testing under the right circumstances but with the given evidence, it is just not financially responsible to do so…
Download file to see previous pages...
Also this topic affects those who are and are not on welfare. Smith, Phillip. Welfare. Digital image. Raising Awareness of the Consequences of Prohibition. N.p., 26 Feb. 2013. Web. 28 Feb. 2013. In my research I have found to be two sides to this argument “Proponents say testing would help the recipients and protect taxpayers. Opponents argue that the practice is unconstitutional and mean-spirited.” (Vitter 141) Both parties make really convincing arguments and surely drove me crazy trying to choose a side “The proponents of drug testing welfare argue that it is irresponsible for any government to fund people who they know are using drugs” (Chelsea 2). It is true that there are drug addicts everywhere but let us faces the facts; they buy their drugs with their own money and do not depend on any government to finance their addiction. It is therefore illogical for any person on welfare to be addicted to any sort of drugs since they cannot even fend for themselves and instead depend on welfare funds. Governments provide unemployed people with some amount of money to enable them take care of themselves as well as their children. However, it is common that most people on welfare do not use this money well and instead use it on drugs and other activities that are not beneficial at all.
Statistics from the Temporary Assistance for the Needy says that around 50% of all people on welfare programs are addicted to drugs. “The results suggested that, contrary
to popular opinion, most welfare recipients were not alcohol- or other drugdependent.” (Chelsea 2) it is also shown that out of this population, 75% cannot fend for themselves because of their dependency on drugs. ...
This means that it is because of drugs that almost 40% of all people in welfare programs are on this programs. “It is therefore illogical for governments and other nongovernmental organizations to give out money to these same people to continue with their lifestyle” (Debate club 11). This is the reason why most people propose that before anyone enters a welfare program, they need to be tested to ensure that we are not funding drug addicts to continue with their addiction problems. Most politicians and other stakeholders argue that if this system is put in place, not only will most of the drug addicts stop due to financial constraints, they will have to so that they can get a chance to get into the program. This is therefore a long-term strategy to reduce drug abuse in the US. Debate club, “a meeting of the sharpest minds on the days most important topics”, 6 Match . 2012. Web. 28 Feb. 2013 When this matter got to the senate, it was an arguable issue and most proponents argued that aid has to be provided based on reciprocal obligation. Reaction to the result from tested prisoners which showed that “Welfare-receiving arrestees were more likely to test positive for benzodiazepines (16 percent vs. 7 percent,/? < 0.01) and opiates (13 percent vs. 6 percent, p < 0.05)” (Yacoubian, 143)This was aThis means that whenever aid is given, there has to be some obligation by the person receiving this kind of help. “In West Virginia, delegate CraigBlair wants all welfare recipients to undergo drug testing as a condition of receiving welfare, unemployment compensation,” (Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly 1)This has to apply
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
It must be recognized, however, that many of those on welfare are there because they have not been able to pull themselves out of dire circumstances that are outside of their own control. Drug abuse, however, is one of the circumstances that prevent people from contributing into society rather than taking from it.
Some programs offer social insurance and occupational risks. In the United States, this system has been used to allocate resources from the rich to the poor in the society. Reasons why it is noteworthy According to (Ames, 2012), welfare is beneficial as it is used To reduce the cost of production for employees - To keep social peace in check - Equality in economic activity There are different welfare regimes which include liberal regimes, conservative regimes and social-democratic regimes which have different functions in trying to redistribute resources to the state.
According to Newell (2011), welfare reform has transformed from cash assistance for the poor to a work-focused temporary Assistance for Needy Families program. The author further argues that this has made the issue of substance abuse a periodic policy and a programmatic concern
Recipients of welfare are required to pay for drug tests; many of them do not have the money to pay for such tests. If such people fail such tests, then, they are denied the welfare for a whole year (Dilla 585). Consequently, such people do not get the welfare for a whole year; this is not fair for some people who may be in dire need of such welfare.
The social welfare program began in the United States in the 1930s as a way of ensuring that there was a type of social cover for the elderly citizens of the nation. It was a measure by the government to counter what were considered to be threats to the way of life in modern America, and some of these threats included an increase in the number of the elderly, poverty, widows with no income of their own, and orphaned children.
An intense debate is currently ongoing as to whether Welfare recipient should be drug tested. The opinion in the country is divided almost in the middle regarding the issue with some in support while others strongly oppose the move. Those championing the idea claim that drug testing of Welfare recipients in the country is needed to prevent taxpayers from paying for the drug habits of the evil poor people.
Therefore, philanthropists assert that they have to perform drug tests on these people to ascertain eligibility for the federal aid. This idea was because the philanthropists advocate for a fair use of the taxpayers’ money. The decision regarding undertaking drug test on the federal aid recipients has caused application of different decision criteria in determining the extent of the benefits of the activity.
Their responsibilities solely depend on safety of the workplace (sack, 2010). Therefore, use of drugs is data that is duly private and only in uncommon circumstances an employer can claim to know such use. This is well argued in the
after the initiation of welfare programs, concerns about how the beneficiaries lived and took advantage of the programs dominated the political scene. One of the debates that dominated the political scene is the connection between drug abuse and the recipients of public welfare
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic What is my position on drug testing welfare recipients to receive their benefits for FREE!