The Case of El Proyecto Bienestar - Essay Example

The Case of El Proyecto Bienestar The Case of El Proyecto Bienestar Postma, J. (2008). Balancing power among academic andcommunity partners: The case of El Proyecto Bienestar. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 3(2), p. 17.The research question focuses on devising means of balancing power among academic and other stakeholders like the community. This research question was driven by the need to address varying community needs by the concerned parties in relation to power and ethics behind it.

If the community had to be strengthened according to Postma (2008), power had to be balanced in the society. The research question was determined by stakeholders such as the farmworkers who were the advisors of the project. This research was geared at ensuring that justice prevails in the society in terms of provision of services to all members of the society especially the marginalized groups. The literature review is sufficient enough to bring out the required details on the topic. It begins with a definition of the term environmental justice.

The background also collects data which is analyzed and the results given in a convincing manner. The author used published works by various authors. The review also included tabular information on the various constituencies existent in El Proyecto Bienestar board. The review could be improved by inclusion of more statistical evidences regarding the subject. The study consisted of members of El Proyecto Bienestar. They were selected on a nominal group approach (Postma, 2008). Since participants were selected orally, chances are that a great percentage of the active members would have been underrepresented.

This can be improved through the inclusion of a systematic selection of participants, probably through interviews, questionnaires amongst others. Randomized control trial testing was used to test the interventions used to assess environmental hazards for children of low incomes, as well as test the likelihood of asthma triggers among the farmworkers. Discourse analysis is also used in the case of analysis of policies and literature in the interaction of participants. Through the triangulated approach, the perception of the participants was also assessed.

Postma (2008) indicates that applied conversation analysis and discourse analysis were used to analyze data and information collected during the interactions. From the research, it is possible to conclude that participation of members of the community is vital. CBPR practitioners must ensure that all persons are involved in contribution towards making tangible decisions regarding balancing power among academic and other stakeholders like the community so as to allow for equitable provision of health services.

If community members are allowed to participate in decision making, then they are likely to take part in decision making concerning the subject. The study advocate for adoption of participation measures, which ought to be clearly defined so as all parties take part in their roles as expected. The conclusion relates to the context of the study in the article as it focuses on the implementation process concerning participation. The authors advocate for change through the findings, in that they argue that, change can only be advocated through an inclusiveness of all community members in advocating for change.

In the course of study, Postma (2008) argues that the children of low income backgrounds were at a higher risk of environmental hazards. The farmworker populace was also prone to asthma attacks; thus, need for home programs. Among the ethical concerns are inclusive of the validity of the project in terms of the participants’ health wellbeing. For instance, farmworkers were also prone to heat strokes whilst in the farms. A realization of the CBPR’s practices would ensure that the community acquires benefits, in relation to provision of health services to the community members.

This study is driven towards an inclusive approach to the community approaches. If the entire process has to be controlled and successful, then the entire community has to work in conjunction as evidenced in the research. However, the research does not include tangible mechanisms that can be used to implement change in the community, especially during training. ReferencesPostma, J. (2008). Balancing power among academic and community partners: The case of El Proyecto Bienestar. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 3(2), p. 17.