Webbers concepts in Sonia Sotomayors case - Essay Example

On these issues, a number of cross-examiners tried to seek clarity on statements she made or the previous cases she presided over. Some republicans also attempted to obtain a hot-tempered response from the nominee but she managed to answer all her questions in a very subtle tone that gained more favor for her from the opposition. She was questioned on abortion and her stormy temper. The way she tackled issues on the death penalty, gun control, presidential powers and abortion impressed her harshest cross-examiners as it demonstrated her control of legal concepts.

In turn, we also learn from Weber’s concepts that actions and behavior can originate from within (Swedberg and Ola 2). For example, Sonia’s calm state during her interrogation could have been fuelled by her aim of attaining a post in the Supreme Court. Hence, she avoided her dark angry side, as it would have jeopardized her mission The federal appeals judge, Sonia Sotomayor, accepted that a comment she had made in 2001 was indeed not appropriate. She had said that the wise Latina woman is better placed to make conclusions in some cases than the white man does because she has had to live in that life.

This caused a stir during the interrogation as an explanation was sought as to the basis of that comment. However, she interpreted her statement as an inspiration to the youngsters of the Latino origin. As opposed to how it was perceived, her intention was purely to inspire and not to pose as a racialist. By aspiring to inspire others, she reinforces Weber’s charismatic authority, which is found in a leader whose duty, and goal is to inspire others. Additionally, she tries to change meaning of her initial action; thus, she displays an external action (Swedberg and Ola 2).

According to some critics, confirmation hearings tend to bring out the worst in nominee as well as the senators. The senators act as if they are irritated by the thought of a judge being influenced by factors like gender,