Thomas Aquinas formulates what is known as the Cosmological argument for the existence of God. He uses the basic principle, according to which every cause has an effect, to show there must have been a first cause in the causal sequence that began the…
Download file to see previous pages...
Without the cause, the effect does not follow. Thus, if the first cause did not exist, neither would the middle and last causes in the sequence. If, however, there were an infinite regression of efficient causes, there would be no first efficient cause and, therefore, no middle causes or final effects, which is obviously not the case. Thus, it is necessary to posit some first efficient cause, which everyone calls "God". (Aquinas).
Here we can see that Aquinas derives the principle of causality upon which his argument is based from his experience of the world around him. When Aquinas looks at the world, he realizes there is always an order of cause followed by effect, but no event is ever its own cause or something without a cause. He also rules out the explanation that there could be an infinite regress of causes because, when he looks at the world around him, there is always a first cause in the sequence. Therefore, there must be a first cause for the creation of the Universe, and that cause is God.
There are a couple of problems with Aquinas’s argument that are immediately apparent. The first is that he makes a false and unjustified assumption that it is impossible for the causal chain to regress to infinity. There is no reason to assume this, and it is perfectly plausible that the Universe has always existed. In fact, this account would work better with Aquinas’s principle that every cause has another cause prior to it because if there was a first cause that cause would have to have been caused itself, which according to Aquinas is impossible. The second is that, even if it is true that there was a first cause that does not necessarily entail another cause prior to it, the first cause was God. That cause could have been something else, such as the Big Bang.
In crossing a heath, suppose I pitched my foot against a stone and
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“The Cosmological Argument and the Teleological Argument Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/sociology/1589770-the-cosmological-argument-and-the-teleological-argument
(The Cosmological Argument and the Teleological Argument Essay)
“The Cosmological Argument and the Teleological Argument Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/sociology/1589770-the-cosmological-argument-and-the-teleological-argument.
Rowe’s Cosmological Argument is one example of theism oriented principles that argues that because the universe had a beginning, then it definitely had a cause since everything that comes into existence must have a cause.
A cosmological argument attempts to prove the existence of God. The argument attempts to do this by showing that an infinite number of regressions that caused things to exist, is not there. The cosmological argument usually asserts that God is the final uncaused cause of all things.
According to their argument, the minority groups are sidelined in terms of accessing higher education. In terms of progressive development, gaps are still noticeable in respect of education accessed by the males and females. In this regard, it seems the girl child still lag behind when considering right to education for all.
Violence amongst young people, it is claimed, is becoming increasingly common and hip-hop is partly to blame. However, not everyone sees it quite like that. Despite its negative press, hip-hop has also been seen as a
In his essay on this fascinating topic, Highlet shows himself to be a true believer. He describes his own relationship with Zen and shows why he thinks Zen can be more than a philosophy.
One of Highlet’s main arguments in his essay is the
Federalism refers to a scenario where partial self governing states operate under a central regime. At this level, the federates and the central government have powers that are dictated by law, and cannot be negated or ignored by either party. Anti-federalism refers to a
the first cause argument, the ontological argument, the moral and lastly the argument from design. Each of these tends to support a given conception of God. For instance the first cause argument argues for the existence of an external
Thousands of people are registering for admissions in universities for undergraduate and postgraduate courses (Useem & Miller, 126). Education levels beyond the age of 16 years are however not regarded compulsory.
Many individuals and organizations keep claiming that higher
The second premise states that the universe or the world began to exist. The third premise states that if the world has a cause, then the cause of the world is powerful, personal and immaterial.
The first premise which states that there
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic The Cosmological Argument and the Teleological Argument for FREE!