Nobody downloaded yet

Realism and International Relations Theory - Literature review Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
 This review discusses the existence of international order from the Cold War until today, this literature review aims to undertake a thorough analysis of the key principles of international affairs, state interest, and state behavior. An in-depth exploration of the phenomenon of international order…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.2% of users find it useful
Realism and International Relations Theory
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Realism and International Relations Theory"

Download file to see previous pages In addition to the direct economic costs associated with terrorism and the threat of further terrorism, 9/11 also had important political ramifications.
Importantly, political scientists have been wracking their brains trying to make sense the horrific violence undertaken the morning of 9/11 and further violence inspired by global jihadists bent on taking over the world. Psychologists sought to explore the psychological factors leading people to kill in the name of Allah, domestic-level theorists explored the domestic antecedents to terror including extreme poverty, a lack of education and political repression. System-level theorists however were at a loss to explain the attacks of September 11th and the ensuing War on Terror. Contrary to popular opinion, this essay will persuasively argue that international relations theory can and will explain the War on Terror. While theorists of War and Peace have argued for a new paradigm to explain sub-state terror and the new global threats, a systems level theory which best explains this New World Order is realism. Accordingly, realism as an explanatory theory of international relations is the theory most applicable to the present international order. Although realism will have to evolve to take into consideration the changing face of the international order, particularly in light of the emergence of sub-state actors who wish to fundamentally destroy this present international order, realism is the best system-level theory to understand the global War on Terror.
Realism, as an explanatory theory of international relations, provides perhaps the most concise and strongest definition of what constitutes state interest, behavior and the establishment of the international order.   ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(Realism and International Relations Theory Literature review, n.d.)
Realism and International Relations Theory Literature review. Retrieved from
(Realism and International Relations Theory Literature Review)
Realism and International Relations Theory Literature Review.
“Realism and International Relations Theory Literature Review”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Realism and International Relations Theory

International Relations Theory

...? International Relations Theory What are the three main ‘engines of progress’ that constitute liberal internationalism? The main engines for the liberal internationalism are the instrumental rationality. This entails the calculations of costs and benefits of economics; capitalism and a universal consumer culture; and democracy. The first engine does bring to fore the cost implications for a nation working as a single entity in international business. The costs of such a venture are higher considering the economies of scale are lower as compared to a country that trades as a bloc with other countries. As such, most countries would prefer forming trade blocs to benefit...
12 Pages(3000 words)Assignment

International Relations: Realism and Liberalism

...?WHY DO LIBERAL THEORISTS CLAIM THAT REALISTS HAVE COMPLETELY ‘OVERLOOKED’ THE SPREAD OF ‘LIBERAL PEACE’ IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS? Tutor: Date: Introduction International relations theory has been dominated by the realism because during the World War II liberalism was replaced being a paradigm. With time, liberals restructured their surfaces since they witnessed the state being challenged and they were sure the realists were not ale to account for anything that was going to happen. Since then there has been misunderstanding between the two paradigms. In order to better understand the two paradigms, differentiating the two will not have...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay


...effective and influential one in respect of elucidating the political transformations being made at the global stage during the present era. The study will also discover the relation of these theoretical frameworks with the movie Lord of the Flies directed by Harry Hook in 1990, and the film Independence Day (1996) directed by Roland Emmerich. Consequently, the study will provide a critical appreciation of the above-mentioned theoretical frameworks by demonstrating their association with the international politics one the one hand, and with the films afore-mentioned on the other. First articulated by the American political-scientist Kenneth Waltz in his remarkable work Theory of...
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay

Realism and Hans Morgenthau in International Relations

...Realism and Hans Morgenthau in International Relations According to Morgenthau: "Political realism believes that politics, like society in general, is governed by objective laws that have their roots in human nature. In order to improve society it is first necessary to understand the laws by which society lives. The operation of these laws being impervious to our preferences, men will challenge them only at the risk of failure."1 Morgenthau contends that the necessities that construct a society are the roots of the politics that govern the society and are taken for granted. It is assumed that these politics as correct and serve the society purposes and are only subject...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Realism and Idealism in International Relations

...The idea that the s will only intervene in the the affairs of others when their own interests are at stake is a re ment of Realism, one of the more influential theories in modern International Relations. Realism suggests that international states exist in a state of anarchy and that they only act in order to protect themselves from falling prey to the dominion of other nations. This is Realism at its most superficial reading but the theory has a complex history and has many different offshoots which reflect differing points of emphasis and context. To truly understand the theory it is important to follow it through its history of development and how it has been refined into new variations by the realities of historical change... ...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

International Relations Theory

...and contradictory, premises. Hans Morgenthau (1948) first expounded a theory on internationalrelations which explained the past and current events and which will be the likely direction and shape of future relations. Morgenthau's ideas is similar to writings on world politics and represented continuity with the past. The realist approach stems from Thucydides, the chronicler of the ancient Peloponnesian War, who wrote, "The strong do what they have the power to do, the weak accept what they have to accept." Thucydides pushed for a first-class navy and the wealth of empire gave an edge to Athens. (Thucydides, 1978). It was "the growth of Athenian power and the...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

What are the main differences between classical(or historical) realism and structural realism in the theory of International Relations Why are those differences relevant to the study of global politics the 5th century A.D. Since 5th century; realism has been often used for predicting as well as understanding international relations. Two famous texts which described structural realism and classical realism elaborately were Waltzs ‘Theory of International Politics’ and Morgenthaus ‘Politics Among Nations’. However in the 20th and 21st centuries, Realism and has experienced a major setback as a result of the increasing amounts of economic warfare as well as the impact of globalization. This has made the world extremely complex and unsuitable to be viewed from the realist perspective. Philosophers and...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Liberalism and Realism - International Relations

...that realism proposes the understanding that politics is a game played between individuals for their personal gain and that the whole agenda of international politics goes beyond morality, ideology and social reconstructions, and the focus is generally relied upon national security and stability within the political framework of the country. Realism is a pessimistic theory which emphasis the fact that national security and development has to happen due to the competition which the nation state possess from outside its borders, and therefore the need for change and adaptation comes more as a necessity rather than a luxury. A realist sees the world from the perspective of...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

On Liberalism and Realism of International Relations

...On Liberalism and Realism of International Relations There are two differing point of views in the field of international relations that have distinct perspectives on the way they view international politics, diplomatic affairs, and warfare or conflict. On one side of the spectrum is the school of thought called Liberalism, and on the other side is Realism or Realpolitik political thinking. Each of their distinctive natures and rationales will be discussed further on. Liberalism holds that the concepts of morality, friendship, mutual cooperation, and also altruism as factors can influence the behavior in...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

World Politics in International Relations: Realism

... World politics in international relations Introduction There are general theories in the discipline of international relations that are contending. Realism is an international politics view that insists on its conflictual and competitive side. Its contrast is based on liberalism and idealism both of which have an emphasis on cooperation. In the international arena, realists consider the main actors to be the states which act to pursue their own national interests, struggle to achieve power and their own security is their concern. Realists have a negative side that emphasizes on self -interest and...
4 Pages(1000 words)Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Literature review on topic Realism and International Relations Theory for FREE!

Contact Us