We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

How Did the New Diplomacy of 1919 Differ From the Old - Essay Example

Comments (0)
Summary
The aim of the present work is not only to discuss the differences, which existed and exist at present between the old diplomacy of the pre-war period and the new diplomacy, but to define and evaluate these differences, and conclude, whether it is truthful to define the two stages of the diplomatic history as the ages of old and new diplomacy, as many authors debate as for the existence of drastic differences between these two notions.
Download full paper
GRAB THE BEST PAPER
How Did the New Diplomacy of 1919 Differ From the Old
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
How Did the New Diplomacy of 1919 Differ From the Old

Download file to see previous pages... 'Despotism was an integral part of the old order which had to be overcome. To this way of thinking the decisive step in establishing the new order was a change in political leadership; the people themselves had to take over control of political life'. (Gilbert 1951: 26) This quotation was related to the French republic, which during the eighteenth century was one of the most prominent and powerful European states; simultaneously, it is impossible to omit the discussion of the diplomacy, which was characteristic to the country until the beginning of the WWI.
It is interesting to look at France as one of the clear representatives of the diplomatic system, which existed before the WWI. The period, which we are here to discuss and consider, is the period of the 'Third French Republic', and the Constitution of 1875, which put the grounds to the diplomatic system of France, in conjunction with the traditions of the state.
Schuman (1931) in his book about French diplomacy before the WWI wrote about the traditions, existing in the political system of France at the end of the 19th century, and which have created the irreversible effects on the course of diplomacy in Europe:
'In France, as in the other States of the Western State System, the control of foreign affairs was traditionally a prerogative of royalty during the formative period of modern international relations. From the earliest times to the Great revolution, the subject matter of diplomacy and international law dealt mainly with the dynastic relations and territorial ambitions of royal families and foreign policy was largely a personal affair of the king'. (p. 94)
It is interesting to closer consider the idea, brought by this citation: on the one hand, the old...
This paper approves that the balance of powers, so actively argued by the diplomats after the end of the WWI, is often seen to be kept at present, with these Powers having more authority in influencing the adoption of the international diplomatic decisions. Thus, the differences between the ‘old’ and the ‘new’ diplomacy appear rather vague and unclear, than one has used to take them.
This report makes a conclusion that that the ‘new’ diplomacy does exist, and there is no doubt that the beginning and the end of the WWI has become the turning point for the international conduct of the diplomacy. As the consequence, the pre-war diplomacy due to its secrecy and inability to correctly rule the balance of powers has failed to prevent the beginning of the WWI. Thus, through the end of the WWI the necessity to re-consider the general principles of the international diplomacy has come into surface. Though some of the principles ad features of the pre-war diplomacy, as hierarchy, are still traced through the diplomatic affairs of the present times, it is no doubt that the whole picture of the post-war diplomacy has absolutely changed. The diplomats have the right to debate the existence of the two stages in the development of the diplomatic history, as well as the effectiveness of the measures, implemented after the WWI to make peaceful processes work; but it is evident, that with the development of communication, industrialization and technologies, the process of conducting diplomacy has changed its appearance, having become faster, more personal and closer to public. ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
The Theoretical Foundations of the Old Diplomacy Are Outdated
(Hamilton & Langhorne, 2011, p.1). Watson (1991, p.14) describes it in even greater detail as the ‘dialogue between states – the machinery by which their governments conduct it, and the networks of promises, contracts, institutions and codes of conduct which develop out of it.
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay
Diplomacy
Nowadays it has become obvious that there is some vacuum in existent international relations. Today we face some serious disagreements with respect to the question what kind of world order should be established in the twenty first century. The arriving of new age has left us a handle to give thought to the future of international relations and the role of world diplomacy in their evolution.
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
Old Labour/ New Labour
The Labour Party is a membership organisation consisting of Constituency Labour Parties, affiliated trade unions and socialist societies, including the Co-operative Party, with which it has an electoral agreement. Members who are elected to parliamentary positions take part in the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP) and European Parliamentary Labour Party (EPLP).
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Diplomacy
In both the cases, the attempt was failed miserably at the end. Napoleon was defeated in the Waterloo battle and central powers suffered humiliating defeat in World War 1. Both the Vienna Congress and the Versailles peace
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
How Effective Is The New Human Rights Council Compared To The Old Commission
This paper shall compare the effectiveness of the old and new Human Rights Council considering different aspects in the resolution of human
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay
Why did Woodrow Wilson criticise the 'old diplomacy' What were the main ingredients of the 'new diplomacy' that emerged after the First World War
Diplomats, ambassadors, high commissioners, consulates, consulate generals, senior government officials, and individuals take place in the dialogue and negotiations on international relations. Diplomatic information is secretive
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay
How the standards for ascertaining the truth differ between the new scientific views of the world and traditional medieval views
All scientists are involved in the same enterprise of trying to explain how the world works. They believe in the scientific process of observation, experimentation and the development and evaluation of explanatory theories (Sherman and Salisbury 440-460).
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Paris Peace Conference 1919
All the delegates confessed that their countries were willing to cooperate to restore a state of peace. This paper seeks to discuss the various themes that were evident in the speeches which were read and the part that was played by four representatives of
6 Pages(1500 words)Term Paper
How do old design techniques differs from the new technological ones
As technology was adopted, these methods slowly faded away and as time went by, every practitioner became conversant with the new methods of computer-aided design (CAD). However, from the recent developments attributable to the new technological methods in
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
Old to New, how will older ports Compete with new and larger Structures
Containerization has changed the way ports are designed. Newer ports take more space and designed in a way that the ports are able to handle containerization. Therefore, older ports have been
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Let us find you another Essay on topic How Did the New Diplomacy of 1919 Differ From the Old for FREE!
Contact us:
+16312120006
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us