Research offers a wide range of factors that are associated with the development of disruptive behaviour. Offending can be attributed to four kinds of risk and protective factors: individual risk factors, family risk factors, peer risk factors, and school risk factors, and community risk factors…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Download file to see previous pages
Research offers a wide range of factors that are associated with the development of disruptive behaviour. Offending can be attributed to four kinds of risk and protective factors: individual risk factors, family risk factors, peer risk factors, and school risk factors, and community risk factors. However, the signs that a child is heading toward offending varies from child to child and usually a result of combination of many factors (University of Pittsburg, 2002).The prevalence of one or more risk factors in a child's life is not always the best predictor of outcomes and children vary in terms of how they respond to risk. Risk factors are context-dependent and vary over time and with different circumstances. Where a combination of risk factors exist, a poor outcomes for the children is increased (McCarthy, 2004). For example, poor parenting is a risk factor, but when coupled with a child's poor academic performance in a school where rules of conduct are laidback and teachers are dissatisfied, the chances of the child actually committing a crime increases (University of Pittsburg, 2002).The predictors of offending varies according to age group. For children aged between 6 and 11, committing an offence appears to be the best predictor of future delinquent behaviour; the strongest predictors for children aged 12 to 14 are a lack of social ties and association with antisocial peers (McCarthy, 2004). Risk and protective factors changes over time. ...
The most important predictors, at age 8-10, of later delinquency (whether measured by convictions or by self-reports) fell into six categories of theoretical constructs (Farrington, 1994):
(1) Antisocial child behaviour, including troublesomeness in school, dishonesty and
(2)Hyperactivity-impulsivity-attention deficit, including poor concentration,
restlessness, daring and psychomotor impulsivity.
(3) Low intelligence and poor school attainment.
(4) Family criminality, including convicted parents, delinquent older siblings, and
siblings with behaviour problem.
(5) Family poverty, including low family income, large family size, and poor housing.
(6) Poor parental child-rearing behaviour, including harsh and authoritarian discipline,
poor supervision, parental conflict and separation from parents.
Assessing Family-based Risk
The influence of family is an essential factor in child development. Family management problems, family conflict and inappropriate modelling behaviours such as parental involvement
in criminal activities, drug abuse or heavy drinking may all affect whether a child becomes involved in delinquent and offending behaviour (McCarthy, 2004). Children and their families defy thin descriptions. Social, environmental, and family risk factors tend to cluster, and any number of them can occur together within the same family (Wasserman et al, 2003). For some children, the primary risk factor may be a family risk factor such as lack of parental supervision; for others, it may be an individual risk factor such as a diagnosis
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Family risk factors are predictors of offending Essay”, n.d.)
Family risk factors are predictors of offending Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/sociology/1518214-family-risk-factors-are-predictors-of-offending
(Family Risk Factors Are Predictors of Offending Essay)
Family Risk Factors Are Predictors of Offending Essay. https://studentshare.org/sociology/1518214-family-risk-factors-are-predictors-of-offending.
“Family Risk Factors Are Predictors of Offending Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/sociology/1518214-family-risk-factors-are-predictors-of-offending.
Children that experience neglect in their childhood, are rejected by their parents, develop conflicts with their parents or siblings, and are inadequately supervised increase their risk of becoming criminal in adulthood.
This statement provides the platform for this paper since it seeks to understand the extended and short-term detrimental effects of vaccines on the body. It is important to analyze different categories of vaccines such as travel, which encompass yellow fever and hepatitis, as well as non-travel vaccines.
This paper examines the relationship between three physiological risk factors, i.e. stress, depression, and anxiety, and their effects on heart disease. This research revealed that three physiological response mechanisms are multi-dimensional where one has an effect on leading or causing the other response and the other response being caused by it.
Development Criminologists argue that both the individual and family factors can determine future offending behavior. Discuss these factors and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of this perspective INTRODUCTION Human behavior according to Downes and Rock, P.
Other themes in the paper include minimization and denial of female sexual offending, theoretical foundations such as the chivalry hypothesis and the biological arguments, as well as gender norms, particularly attitudes to female aggression and violence. Finally, the paper will outline the different typologies associated with female sexual offenders and issues on concealment of their offending behaviour.
Crime is blamed on nefarious criminal subcultures operating in the shadows of polite society. Crime must be prevented by throwing its perpetrators in prison and throwing away the keys. A careful examination of the relevant literature demonstrates the folly of such myths.
Individual risk factors also include circumstances like negative life events, including failing a course at school, being suspended or expelled from school, breaking up with a boyfriend or girlfriend, having a big fight or problem with a friend, and the death of someone close (Thornberry et al., 2003 as cited in Wyrick and Howell, 2004)
The most effective way to reduce health risks, and perhaps the most ignored, is the improvement of lifestyle choices that are sure to prevent chronic diseases. Thus, avoiding potential health costs altogether at the most primary level.
Additionally, there is the common practice of assisted desistance where organisations and people assist people caught up in cycles of crimes to successfully desist lives of crime (Farrall 2006).
While offenders are not a homogenous group, there is an array of needs,
There is a significant reason to deduce that disease was genetically acquired following his family history. His mother had a history of coronary bypass surgery and at 54 years, my father also had the same surgery. Atherosclerosis has been implicated to various
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Family risk factors are predictors of offending"
with a personal 20% discount.