This paper deems to argue the statement: “A nation has a right to go to war to protect its citizens from external and internal threats or possible interventions which threaten its existence and unity”. Opponents may argue a nation has no right to go to war in order to avert possible danger…
Download file to see previous pages...
This research will begin with the statement that war is a dangerous and tremendous evil which has put pressures on mankind throughout history. If we look back, we could see there has not been a single century or even decade free of wars and armed conflicts. However, the main question as to whether a nation has an obligation to go to war has not yet been answered. As this question is one that has disturbed many people from politicians and common citizens to clergy and ethicists, it now needs to be answered. Although this is a philosophical question which has different interpretations, this paper will attempt to summarize the basic assumptions in this field while presenting a personal view on this problem based on the thesis that a nation has an obligation to go to war if a situation threatens its existence as a unity, or if it threatens its security and national safety. It is possible to distinguish both the external and internal threats which can cause a nation to go to war. Every nation relies on its own “common sense” which means prudent and reasonable policy towards other nations through the lenses of its own security and safety. For every nation, it is “reasonable” to protect itself, it is ‘reasonable” to defend itself, it is “reasonable” to fight against poor governance, etc. If something is of primary importance for a nation, it becomes an obligation. In this case, “common sense” becomes an obligation of a nation to go to war, if something threatens its happiness....
War can be used by a nation as a defensible tool if a threat is inevitable and predictable.
This, of course, is one of the most bewildering and disturbing aspects of today's wars, for those caught up in them no less than for those observing and trying to understand them. It's difficult to answer the question unambiguously, because each war is unique as it has different roots and causes. Nevertheless, all nations have the right to protect themselves before their innocent people will be injured. In this case, war can be a protection policy aimed at securing peace and happiness. For instance, although the war in Iraq has been claimed by the European community to be one of aggression towards the Iraqi people, from the point-of-view of the United States, it was a necessary step to protect its citizen from adverse intervention by a nation intending to use weapons of mass destruction.
An obligation of a nation go to war can be explained as an effort to reduce possible casualties and sufferings of the population which could be caused by foreign armed aggression.
In this situation, the obligation of a nation to go to war coincides with its strategy to survive as a unity, on the one hand, and with that of defending its national identity on the other. An obligation cannot be explained through a private (personal) interest of people taking part in a battle because a soldier or a general means nothing as a subject, but becomes simply a tool of the battlefield. Taking into account the United States and the war against terror, it's possible to say that an obligation of the nation to go to war concerns the questions of unity of the American nation and its existence. The
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Is a nation has an obligation to go to war Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/sociology/1501260-is-a-nation-has-an-obligation-to-go-to-war
(Is a Nation Has an Obligation to Go to War Essay)
“Is a Nation Has an Obligation to Go to War Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/sociology/1501260-is-a-nation-has-an-obligation-to-go-to-war.
This was undertaken within 21 days of aggressive military operations. According to President George Bush of the US, the invasion was a measure taken to disarm the Iraq government of weapons of mass destruction, bring an end to a regime that supported terrorism, and free the Iraq people from oppression.
Just War tradition was developed by many Christian theologians and Christianity had its own very specific concept of warfare and the way it should be conducted. Just war is rooted on high morals, good principles, exalted ethics, and intense desire to take the right path, honesty and impartiality.
This theory is often used by Christians to try and seek out the moral justification for the means of war. This compiled research will examine this theory and other moral principles from a Christian outlook concerning modern War. The discussion will encircle the principles that Christians have held for decades, using these various moral points to give emphases to when Christians should call for a moral limit in the conduct of those involved during a period of War.
At the same time, this cruel reality give rise to a number of moral and ethical questions related to war practice. Thoughtful people are asking themselves: is war really necessary Is it wrong or right How can it be justified without taking into account the fate of the opponents Can we find a less violent method that can solve our disputes What are our obligations and what are our privileges during war Most important of all, when should we declare war
Another reason is the United States should not have to police the whole world. If there is US interference in this matter, the tide will break open and US troops will have to be deployed worldwide. Finally, the U.S. resources
The plaintiffs claimed for justice before court to get repair and damage cost from defendant who led them to this loss. The case stated above has relevance for analysis because of the reasons and procedures connected with it. The case had undergone three trials
The product includes all the features of a notebook and has multiple functionalities that include high end graphics and extended battery life with high degree of portability.
The manufacturer of iPad 2 is Apple Inc that is a US based multinational company engaged in
The progression of these factors plus others that later developed finally resulted in an all out war (Roberts, p. 45). Each power was seeking to gain from the war finally lost a lot of prospects they had gained through years of committed labor. Germany being one of the
the spread of communism, but also it had a moral obligation to help the South Vietnamese, who faced harsh living conditions to have better lives and secure freedom from the violent attacks of North Vietnam.
The U.S. involvement was necessary because it had to protect South
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Is a nation has an obligation to go to war for FREE!