Cyber Prostitution Issues - Essay Example

? Module No Cyber String 26 November Introduction Crime is defined as the violation of our nation’s federal, and local crime laws. Criminal acts include the perpetrators’ voluntary consent. In 2005 alone, the U.N. Commission on Human Rights persuaded governments help reduce child pornography (Mooney, 2011). Society and the law must be lenient on Jennifer and her mother’s contribution to the crime of child pornography. Sociologists classify prostitution and acting as pornography model is a victimless crime. It is classified as a public order crime. Consequently, Jennifer is guilty for contributing her share to the pornography crime. The viewers of the pornographic pictures are not classified as victims of the pornographic act. The viewers of the pornographic pictures enjoy viewing the naked bodies. Other sociologists insist the prostitutes and pornography “models” are the victims of society. The underworld or criminal syndicates force poor women into the prostitution and pornography jobs (Komblum, 2011). Further, crime occurs when there is an intention to commit the crime. In the United States alone, prostitution is classified as illegal. Any act that is illegal is a crime. Jennifer guiltily intended to connive and conspire to commit the crime of prostitution and posing as pornography model. Jennifer had been jailed for prior infractions of the prostitution and pornography law. However, she continued to continue working as pornography model (Brent, 2013). Pornography comes from the Greek word meaning prostitute. Some customers who view the pornographic picture can contact pimps for online or actual sexual acts (Clinard, 2011). Accordingly, feminist sociologist Kathleen Barry espoused the concept that prostitutes are the forced victims of our patriarchal society. For Jennifer, society forced them into the crime world of prostitution and pornography. If both individuals were born into a rich family, both individuals would not engage in the pornography crime. Jennifer needed to eat, pay the home rent and pay other daily expenses. The male-dominated society is eager to pay for the pornography videos. In exchange, the prostitutes and pornography models receive money for their sexual acts. The money is used to feed the prostitute’s family. With the prostitution money, Jennifer is able to pay for the economic needs of her family, especially the financial needs of Jennifer’s mother (Mattson, 2008). COYOTE and WHISPER are organizations pushing for the legalization of prostitution stating “prostitutes have the right to sell their bodies for profit (Franzese, 2009, p. 219).” The statement clearly resembles the women’s right, especially Jennifer’s right, to pose as pornography model for profit. . Further, consent to a crime does not reduce the crime’s gravity. Society espouses statutes and laws that prohibit certain acts. One of those acts is prostitution. Another act is posing as pornography models. Often, poverty drives the parents to persuade or allow their girls to join the prostitution or pornography world. In most developing countries parents permit children to pose naked for a fee (Mooney, 2011). Mother’s guiltiness Since the mother did not discourage her daughter from engaging in her prostitution activities and posing as pornography model, the mother is guilty of conniving and conspiring with Jennifer to engage the crime of pornography (Mooney, 2011). Prostitution is a crime. Posing as pornography model is also a crime as the act contributes to the moral decay of American society. Consequently, the mother should have taught her daughter to find another legal or morally upright means of livelihood. Since Jennifer is happy with her current illegal sexual services, the mother wrongly does not interfere with her daughter’s criminal activity. Further, United States society grants everyone the freedom to do what one pleases. Consequently, Jennifer can freely realize her dream to work in the army. The mother can scold all day long. However, preventing her daughter from exercising her desire to join the army violates Jennifer’s freedom of choice, as enshrined in our United States constitution. Consequently, Jennifer should be what she wants to be in life, a soldier for the United States government (Dillon, 2009). Additionally, deviant behavior is violating the established societal norms. In some society, societal norms may include the children’s compulsory obedience to their parent’s commands. Jennifer’s joining the army is a deviant act. Jennifer’s mother refused Jennifer’s joining the army. However not all deviant acts are criminal acts. Jennifer obediently complies with her mother’s prohibition. On the other hand, all criminal acts are classified as deviant acts (Meer, 2011). Moreover, Jennifer must calculate the benefits of joining or not joining the army. Joining the army translates to Jennifer’s defiance of her mother’s instructions. Jennifer’s deviant act will result to her gaining army legal employment. Consequently, Jennifer’s army job shows Jennifer will earn a lawful income. Obedient Jennifer does not join the army. Consequently, Jennifer’s obedience results to her working as a prostitute, one of society’s despised jobs (Meer, 2011). Further, enlightenment philosophers espoused the government must grant freedom to its society’s constituents. The philosophers include Kant, Thomas Jefferson, Kant, and Rousseau. They insisted that each individual has reason. Reason grants the individuals the right to choose their unbridled destiny. Reason allows the individuals to seek their individually different social progresses. Consequently, society, especially our United States society, must protect and help individuals exercise their freedoms, including freedom to choose jobs. By supporting individual freedom, the state is boosting the society’s well-being (Dillon, 2009). Furthermore, the actions of Jennifer and her mother clearly show that they espouse one ethics philosophy. The philosophy states that the means used must ensure the best end is met. This falls under the Utilitarian ethics philosophy. Under the Utilitarian ethics, society is required to exercise any act that will ensure the greatest benefit or happiness. Mr. J. Bentham and Mr. J. S. Mill espoused the societal utilitarian ethics (Fuller, 2009). The Utilitarian philosophers approve of Jennifer’s and her mother’s conniving and conspiring to work as pornography model. As a pornography model, Jennifer and her mother were able to achieve the biggest benefit or happiness, huge amount of pornography money (Dillon, 2009). Analyzing the plight of Jennifer and the mother’s non-interference with her daughter’s pornography stints, society should be lenient on the two females. Pushed against the wall, both females did their best to survive. Because of the mother’s poverty, Jennifer was forced against her will to bare her naked body to the prying pornographic cameras. The impoverished mother succumbed to society’s pressures. The pressures include society’s male perverts’ willingness to pay for pornographic videos. Jennifer needs and used the pornography money to buy food, clothing, and other basic needs (Dillon, 2009). Further, society must understand the plight of both Jennifer and her mother. Charles Darwin espoused the principle of survival of the fittest. The principle shows that only the fittest animal, including the human animal, will survive. Without a high school diploma, finding legal job such as a waitress or store salesperson is quite impossible (Tischler, 2010). The principle means only those who are able to adapt to the changing environment will survive. By acting as pornography model, Jennifer was adopting to the real world environment. Her environment offers her money in exchange for her showing her naked body (Tischler, 2010). Conclusion Summarizing, crime is an infraction of established societal laws. Jennifer and her mother willingly contributed to the pornography crime. To survive, both females were forced connive and conspire to enter in the pornography crime environment. Society’s poverty situation played a vital role in crime. Jennifer, like most pornography models, is a victim of our cruel male-dominated society. Overwhelmingly, the economic plight of both Jennifer and her mother requires society’s lenient understanding, interpretation and mitigating judgment. References: Brent, E. (2013). Learn Sociology. New York: Jones & Bartlett . Clinard, M. (2011). Sociology of Deviant Behavior. New York: Cengage Learning. Dillon, M. (2009). Introduction to Sociological Theory. New York: J. Wiley & Sons. Franzese, R. (2009). The Sociology of Deviance. New York: Charles Thomas Press. Fuller, S. (2009). The Sociology of Intellectual Life. New York: SAGE Press. Komblum, W. (2011). Sociology in a Changing World. New York: Cengage Learning. Mattson, G. (2008). Governing Loose Women: Rationalizing European Prostitution. Los Angeles: Proquest. Meer, N. (2011). Sociology for Dummies. New York: J. Wiley & Sons. Mooney, L. (2011). Understanding Social Problems. New York: Cengage Learning. Tischler, H. (2010). Introduction to Sociology. New York: Cengage Learning. Read More