Relativism and Morality - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Relativism and Morality BY YOU YOUR SCHOOL INFO HERE DATE HERE Relativism and Morality Goodman’s viewpoint that there are certain universal principles which are consistently wrong is somewhat flawed. Goodman (2010) highlights that rape, terrorism and murder (as three examples) should be considered wrongs within a global context…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.3% of users find it useful
Relativism and Morality
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Relativism and Morality"

Relativism and Morality BY YOU YOUR SCHOOL INFO HERE HERE Relativism and Morality Goodman’s viewpoint that there are certain universal principles which are consistently wrong is somewhat flawed. Goodman (2010) highlights that rape, terrorism and murder (as three examples) should be considered wrongs within a global context. Murder, as Goodman identifies, is a wrong due to the fact that it violates the inherent rights of the individual. In essence, it destroys the individual and therefore cannot be debated since the victim is unable to engage in future philosophical arguments about right versus wrong. Rape, as yet another example, is a violation of the victim’s personal will and also exploits the victim (Goodman, 2010). However, Goodman is attempting to impose a set of universalist values which are not always going to be embraced by different cultures. In Africa, as one example, rape is a common practice engaged with members of the military and within the family dynamic. When the individual that has been the victim of rape becomes accustomed to this lifestyle, without proper guidance about the morality and ethics of the act, they are simply not educated that rape within the family unit is not acceptable in most cultures. Therefore, without having a moral center within the African culture or government (or in education), whether the act of rape is wrong is completely relative. Mosser (2010) would likely defend the aforementioned argument, as he clearly indicates that the acceptability of moral versus amoral acts are directly linked to one’s culture, religion, worldview and even one’s personal set of values. Using, again, the aforesaid example of rape within the African family dynamic, if the local culture considers these acts to be moral and ethical, it would simply be one (or a handful) of individuals that would attempt to challenge the moral and ethical principles of rape. It would seem, however, that Goodman is attempting to illustrate that it would be the majority within society that would be the proverbial gatekeepers of morality and ethics, thus being the dominant force in determining the moral and ethical acceptability of such issues such as rape, murder and even terrorism. However, society should consider that history often determines whether a group or individual should be considered a terrorist. For instance, there could be many British individuals that considered the war that occurred during American independence were all terrorists, as they defied the majority rule of the British empire during the time period. However, American history has painted the individuals that founded the United States as heroes that were simply defending the needs, wants and values of the American citizens during the Revolutionary War. Now, using the argument of the Revolutionary War as the primary example, Mosser is given support for the relativist view of morality and ethics. As he argues that relativism is related to one’s personal values, culture, and even religion, he would likely ponder the American Revolution, using the worldview as an example, to recognize that not everyone in global culture views the founders of the American society as heroes and saviors. Instead, Mosser would likely engage in debates that recognize that morality and ethics are largely individual and cannot be justified by any one set of moral and ethical contracts. All situations that are questionable as it relates to morality and ethics illustrate that there are not simply some scenarios and human actions that are wrong and cannot be debated since they are massive violations of the individual will and generic human rights. When a tyrannical government is overthrown, thus liberating society from oppression or domination, it takes a group of individuals (whether private citizens or militaristic) to provide the tools or support necessary to achieve the goal of said liberation. Today’s global culture, such as those supported by such organizations as the United Nations, tend to attempt to impose a universalist approach to guiding and critiquing ethical and moral behaviors. These organizations, and several others in global culture, have much support from society and global governments which seems to add more clout to the basic and generic human rights issues. It would be the majority, in such a case, that would dictate the acceptability and moral responsibility of certain human actions that should be considered to be immoral or unethical. However, if certain cultures began to reject this doctrine that rape, terrorism and murder are always wrong, it is likely that a more relativist viewpoint would be embraced, thus changing the dynamics of majority rule when it comes to determining whether certain situations are unethical or immoral. Having offered all of the aforesaid arguments, Goodman is not correct in stating that there are always going to be certain human actions that should absolutely be considered wrong. There cannot be a singular set of universal principles and social contracts that should guide global society. There is simply too much diversity in cultures, when taking a global viewpoint, to attempt to impose a singular, universalist set of values and ethical contracts. Eventually, these doctrines will be rejected by those who demand change, thus Goodman is really, after assessing the viability of his argument, simply using his own opinion which is absolutely not going to be shared by everyone in global society. References Goodman, Lenn E. (2010). Some Moral Minima, The Good Society, 19(1), pp.87-94. Mosser, Kurt. (2010). Ethics and Social Responsibility. Pearson. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Relativism and Morality Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 2”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Relativism and Morality Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words - 2)
“Relativism and Morality Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words - 2”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Relativism and Morality

Relativism and Morality

...? Sociology January 23, In the critical appraisal of Matilal’s attempt to separate relativism from pluralism Goodman first questions whether ethos can exist outside a culture or community of language users which I thought was a good question to consider. As described by Aristotle ethos is our tendency towards trusting other individuals based on their similarity to us, their characteristics and the way they present themselves. While we would not exist in the same fashion certainly I think that people would actually be much more aware and perceptive of others moods and feelings without the huge amount of communication and language we have today which can sometimes make it more difficult to be perceptive enough of other...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Relativism and Morality

...? RELATIVISM AND MORALITY al affiliation Many things that are happening and had happened in the past around the world were simply wrong. The moral stance of some societies or governments take are not acceptable to other societies and governments and people as a whole .Morals vary from country to country from time to time and from society to society. Government heads who wrap themselves in a cloak of moral perfection and virtues perpetrate mass killings and atrocities as crusade to safeguard their societies. Things or acts which are accepted as moral by one culture may not be accepted as moral by others. In the past some...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

Relativism and Morality

...?Relativism and Morality It is undeniable that morality is relative especially considering the much differences we have among the diverse societies in the world. What is considered morally right in one society might be immoral in another societal set up. However, there are moral issues that seem to encompass humankind irrespective of social, ethnic, religious, economic, or cultural set up. Goodman strongly argues that certain things are simply wrong and therefore, morality cannot be wholly relativistic. There appears to be a convergence at some point when some pertinent issues are considered. In this paper, I agree with Goodman that...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Relativism and Morality

...Lenn Goodman argues that there are certain things that are simply wrong. Do you think Goodman is right? Some things are just fundamentally wrong. This was the thesis of Lenn E. Goodman in the treatise “Some Moral Minima” which took a quite different turn in today’s age of subjectivity and moral relativism. It is laudable because the article stood that there are just some values and morals that does not change with time or does it depends on one’s interpretation which falls prey to the danger of convenience and laxity. The arguments asserted by Goodman were also sound and grounded on well thought reason and did not pontificate nor pretended any righteousness from any...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Relativism and Morality

...? Relativism and Morality Relativism and Morality The work ‘Some Moral Minima’ by Lenn E. Goodman shakes the very roots of relativism. As Mosser (2010) notes, relativism holds the basic view that there is no absolute truth, ethics, or principles. That means the validity of these things depends on the culture and context they originate. In sharp contrast to this view that the intelligentsia cherished for quite some time, Goodman (2010) claims that there are some basic ‘wrongs’ which are universally accepted as wrongs and are not bound by regional or cultural contexts. Though Goodman (2010) does not deny the existence of relativism, he claims that there are certain basic human universals; and he also claims that terrorism, genocide... with...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Relativism and Morality

...?Running Head: RELATIVISM AND MORALITY Relativism and Morality Relativism and Morality In the issue on relativism and morality is continuously a subject of discussion and debate in the peers of philosophers. It is a challenge to conclude on the issue due to the complexity and inconsistency of the factors involved. This had been observed and discussed by Lenn Goodman in the paper entitled Some Moral Minna (2010). Relativism is defined as the lack of absolute truth or validity of a particular concept of thought which can only be described in relation to other concepts,...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Relativism and Morality

...? Relativism and morality Task: Introduction It is clear that different cultures have been involved in activities that aim todetermine the procedure on determining moral choices. However, sources have depicted that some cultures have dissimilar perceptions on moral choices adopted by other cultures. For instance, some people regard what other cultures believe as being right or wrong. In her book, Goodman examines numerous aspects of relativism along with morality (Goodman, 2010). She, therefore, addressed numerous things seemed to be wrong by the majority. Therefore, this script will use some examples to explore the challenges discussed by Goodman on relativism. In addition, it will enlighten on the possibility of the existence... of...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

The Problem of Relativism and Morality

...? The problem of Morality and Relativism Number Number Teacher’s Due The problem of Morality and Relativism Morality and relativism are problems that philosophers have grappled with for a very long time now. For centuries, man has been confounded with the problem as to whether he needs a universal moral standard or not. These questions have been tied up with the subjectivity of man and how the interpretations of modern realities take shape. It also depends to a great extent on how the conceptions of god have evolved. If one looks at the ethics and morality of the Western civilization, one can see that the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Relativism and Morality

...? Relativism and Morality Relativism and Morality In many societies, morality is a controversial issue as it varies across different cultures and communities. Morality refers to acceptable behavior in a specific society or context. Alternatively, moral minima go hand in hand with the concept of morality. Moral minima are principles which members of society have to live by to be considered to be operating within the circles of upright moral conduct. Relativism is the argument that no action is wrong and each culture has the right to define what is right or...
4 Pages(1000 words)Assignment

Morality & Cultural Ethical Relativism

...Morality & Cultural Ethical RelativismMorality and Self-interest Scenario The issue of ethics sometimes appears to be difficult when it comes to certain issues or scenarios especially where one needs to chose between self interest and interest of others in a group. Some people may few that the concern or putting the interest of others before self interest of others is a central or necessary dimension of virtue. However, the danger to this dimension is that it may obscure the views of other people’s realities which must also claim some significant. In particular, taking into considerations the interests of others too is morally right because morality is...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Relativism and Morality for FREE!

Contact Us