Comparison and contrast of Emile Durkheim And Talcott Parsons- Education And Inequality sociological perspectives - Essay Example

Comments (1) Cite this document
This essay analyses the similarities and differences between their ideas on education and inequality. Parsons and Durkheim view the importance of education in industrialized societies from divergent perspectives. Durkheim recognizes the role education plays in complex industrialized societies where life is impersonal…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.4% of users find it useful
Comparison and contrast of Emile Durkheim And Talcott Parsons- Education And Inequality sociological perspectives
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Comparison and contrast of Emile Durkheim And Talcott Parsons- Education And Inequality sociological perspectives"

Download file to see previous pages Emile Durkheim and Talcott Parsons belong to the functionalist school of thought regarding sociology. Emile Durkheim (1858 - 1917) is known as one of the founding fathers of sociology and most of his ideas lie within structural functionalism. He holds that education has several functions in society. Talcott Parsons (1902 - 1979) on the other hand was more of a development of Emile’s ideas. This essay analyses the similarities and differences between their ideas on education and inequality.
Both Durkheim and parsons believe that the school plays the central role in socialization. French sociologist Emile Durkheim believed that it was a means of transmission of societal norms and values. Talcott Parsons on the other hand, argues that the family provides primary socialization while the school is the basic socializing agency in society preparing the children for future roles. Therefore, all of them agree on the important role the school plays in the social system.Both Durkheim and Parsons believe that education inspires social solidarity. He posits that society survives best with a degree of homogeneity and education enforces such homogeneity by teaching the child the demands of life and “essential similarities” at an early age. He continues that without such “essential similarities” and social solidarity, social life becomes impossible. (Saha 1997, p. 3). Parsons also believes that education inspires social solidarity but in the end when it comes to the work setting. He holds that employers require a variety of skilled employees and when these personnel come together to achieve a specific goal, social solidarity is inspired. As such, for Parsons, the aspect of social solidarity through education is more indirect as compared to Durkheim. Both of them recognize the role of education to provide a link between an individual and society though through different angles. Durkheim argued that for a child to be attached to society the child must feel something real and powerful that dominates them and to which they attribute the better part of themselves. He believes that education provides this all-important link between the individual and society. He says that children should learn the history of their society so that they feel that they are part something greater them hence they develop a sense of commitment to society (Saha & Zubrzycki 1997, p. 8). Parsons however does not put forth the idea of education as to attach individuals in society but he sees education as the bridge between the universalistic and particularistic judgment of individuals in society. Therefore, education fills the gap between primitive and informed judgment. Both Parsons and Durkheim contend that education fosters equality. Durkheim views this equality through similar school rules that guide the behavior of children. Parsons on the other hand holds that education ensures equality through providing equal opportunities and rating students according to their performance (Haralambos & Holborn 2008, p. 109). By putting them in the same classroom setting and setting the same examinations, schools teach the value of equality. This value later helps them have proper judgments especially when faced with differential reward for differential accomplishments in the work setting. It ensures that both the high and low achievers perceive the system as just because status is achieved through equal chance. Both parsons and Durkheim acknowledge that education provides individuals with skills for future roles. Durkheim acknowledged that education provides skills for future occupations and that in industrial society’s social solidarity depends on specialized skills. For instance, the manufacturer of a product requires cooperation from a collection of specialists (Cladis 1999, pg 96). This necessity facilitates social solidarity. Parsons on the other hand, sees education as a mechanism to select individuals for ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Comparison and contrast of Emile Durkheim And Talcott Parsons- Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Comparison and Contrast of Emile Durkheim And Talcott Parsons- Essay)
“Comparison and Contrast of Emile Durkheim And Talcott Parsons- Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 6 times
Comments (1)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
faustino53 added comment 9 months ago
Student rated this paper as
Great paper! Used it to complete an assignment for a sociology course. It was easy as ABC, for the first time in my life.

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Comparison and contrast of Emile Durkheim And Talcott Parsons- Education And Inequality sociological perspectives

Death Penalty and Emile Durkheim

...? Thesis Proposal: “Death Penalty and Emile Durkheim” of 0.0. Introduction The death penalty is a violation of human rights itis also unfair, unjust and practices the very behavior it is meant to condemn. In most countries it is applied in arbitrary and discriminatory ways. The death penalty has been applied in western civilization for over two thousand years. About two centuries ago countries like France, Italy and England challenged issues surrounding its application and abuse. Despite being abolished in some countries mostly in Europe, it is still a very controversial and hotly debated topic. Innocent prisoners have narrowly escaped being executed while some have unfortunately been executed. This...
16 Pages(4000 words)Research Paper

How do Marx, Durkheim, Weber, and Parsons view the social world

...a society and the environment outside it, while the second two refer to the processes that operate within a society. This amounts to a new theory of sociology which can be applied across the board to help describe the features of different societies. It uses the language of cybernetics, and thanks to its flexibility, it can be applied even in complex situations where identification with multiple societies exists, and where societies overlap or change in unpredictable ways. References Durkheim, Emile. The Division of Labor in Society. Introduced and edited by Lewis A. Closer. New York: The Free Press, 1997 [originally published in French in 1893]. Parsons,...
8 Pages(2000 words)Research Paper

Life, Work, and Relevance of Emile Durkheim

...that Durkheim altered and produced Comte’s sociology as Littre had conformed the political insinuation of his teaching. Littre demonstrated that Comte’s effort to guide political policies and principles depicted from sociology perspective needed not like they did in Comte’s case, which led to totalitarianism (Sulek 566). Durkheim, under the assistance of his tutor Emile Boutroux, at ENS, was instigated to closer study of Comte’s sociology work and set about exclusion of some of the bigotry that had contributed to its disregard in academic spheres. From Boutroux and Comte Durkheim took the concept that...
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper

Emile Durkheim, Karl Marx and Max Weber

...Emile Durkheim, Karl Marx and Max Weber Introduction: Emile Durkheim, Karl Marx and Marx Weber were sociologist who contributed to sociological theory, their theories are today relevant in the society, however critics on their theories have led to some insignificance in their theories, and this paper discusses some of the theories by the scholars and shows their relevance to today society. We focus on the bureaucratization theory, social fact theory, religion, division of labor and specialization and the capitalist theory by Marx. All these theories explain the society we live in today but they also form a basis of determining whether the scholars work is relevant in today’s society. Max Weber: In this section we discuss major... . This is...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Emile Durkheim Theories

...WHAT DID EMILE DURKHEIM MEAN WHEN HE SPOKE ABOUT ''SOCIAL FACTS'' Introduction Durkheim was a French sociologist who made a tremendous contribution to the modern sociology and anthropology. During his time Durkheim worked on several works which came to be accepted in the social science academic world. He has been considered to be one of the founding fathers of modern sociology and one of those who proposed solidarism as a social way of life. Durkheim contributed many theories and ideas that formed the base of development of modern studies in sociology and anthropology. He developed theories and ideas...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Inequality: A Sociological Analysis

...Inequality: A Sociological Analysis This paper deals with social inequality and access to healthcare. Access to adequatehealth care by the members of the society is highly influenced by their income levels and social equalities. The poor people are unable to access effective health care services as compared to the rich. They cannot afford insurance coverage leading to inadequate healthcare. The data from the CTSIP (table 1) indicate that most low income earners earning between $15000 and $35000 annually have no health care coverage and thus accumulate the highest percentage of the population with no health insurance. On the other hand, high earners indicate the lowest percentage of...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Sociological Perspectives Comparison

...Durkheim, Robert Merton and Talcott Parsons, views the society as one major organ system that depends on the functionality of the various organs in the system. According to functionalism, the society is a system of interrelated sections that work together harmoniously to retain a state of equality and balance. For example, the family participates in the reproduction and nurturing of children. Second, education and school contributes towards offering knowledge and societal skills to the kids. Third, politics grants a way of governing members of the society. Finally religion provides spiritual and moral education. The conflict...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Emile Durkheim and Max Weber

...Emile Durkheim and Max Weber Émile Durkheim along with Max Weber was French sociologists who had major assumptions on ontology, epistemology and nature of humans in general. They rose to prominence during the 19th century due to their ideologies and views about human nature and society on the whole. These philosophers were known for their sociological views same as Karl Marx. These pioneers with their theory of sociology attempted to connect the society with the social and conscious working of people. They explains the nature of society and the connection it has in building the well being of people and their consciousness in general. They understood that society is a creation of social beings and its reality is as complex... is not a...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Emile Durkheim

...Emile Durkheim: The Social Facts This paper investigates into one of the most significant contributions to sociological science made by one of the most famous sociologists of the world – Emile Durkheim. The social facts, according to Durkheim, make the subject matter of sociology and separate it into an independent science. We will investigate into the concept of the social fact, give their example, determine what not a social fact is, and analyze views of modern sociologists on Durkheim’s works by means of analysis of an article Relationship Transitions Among Older Cohabitors: The Role of Health, Wealth,...
7 Pages(1750 words)Term Paper

Sociological Perspectives

...Sociological Perspectives Compare Perspectives Charles Horton Cooley mentions that the development of our sense of self lies in the reflection of others. Herbert Mead shares a similar opinion because he says that the socialization process involves “role taking’, in which we make assumptions on the perceptions the society has about the self. These assumptions guide human behavior in the societal context. On the other hand, Erving Goffman emphasizes on the need for self-image to enhance the socialization process. Sigmund Freud sees the self as the most primitive part of a person’s personality, which the conscience guides. All the four philosophers agree on the influence and perception from...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Comparison and contrast of Emile Durkheim And Talcott Parsons- Education And Inequality sociological perspectives for FREE!

Contact Us