We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet


Comments (0)
Jean Jacques Rousseau is a well-known philosopher and social critic. In his major works, Emile and The Social Contract, he discussed several ideas like the nature of man, family relationships, people and the society, the state and government. In his books and discourses, he analysed and presented these issues to establish significant linkages between each idea…
Download full paper
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample

Download file to see previous pages... This means that he believed that man is by nature a good being . Man in this state of nature can live freely as he can be and independent from others. He is only driven by his minimal desires usually his needs for survival like food and shelter. In this state of nature, there is no place for war because people are not focused in acquiring more possessions. They do not have to depend on each other for their existence as they are not compelled to have social interactions. But he believed that a social contract between people in a society exists. The freedom that people enjoyed is based on the General Will and not on their private will. There is no really need for policies or rules because they obey orders based on common sense. He used family relationships to elaborate the nature of man and his society, family being the basic political unit of a society. In the primitive societies, children obeyed their fathers for the reason of survival. They have to obey their fathers as long as they need to depend on him for their food, shelter, etc. .But at the age of maturity when the children already have the capacity or ability to provide for their needs, the natural bond between them has to be removed. They have to live independently, the children being freed from obeying their father and the father from the concern for his children. But in instances, they choose to stay together, then it is out of choice and not by nature. This is how primitive societies function in the state of nature according to Rousseau. The father and children relationship is analogous to the relationship of the political leader and its people. Father being the leader and the children are its people. Children are all born free and equal but they give up their freedom for their advantage. This happens when at the age of maturity and rationality, when a child could attend to his survival and becomes the master of his own, he chose to remain in the custody of his father. However, there is a difference between a father’s love for his children and a leader’s for his people. In the family, the father’s love for his children repays him for the concern that he bestows upon them; while, in the State, the pleasure of ruling makes up for the leader’s lack of love for his people (Dunn, 2002). In Rousseau’s point of view, it is not the nature of man to be bad but the society and the institutions within it that forces him to be evil. He argued that it is society, the restoration of arts and sciences, that corrupts the pure individual. Changes brought about by civilization have forced man to lose his natural goodness. For example the knowledge and progress that man has achieved in his life made him egoistic, greedy and ambitious. He developed a sense of private property and desires to acquire more of it. Private property was introduced when man started to make fences and claimed that land to be his. People were not easily satisfied and felt unfulfilled even in the peaceful state of nature, they seek for social interactions for self-actualization. So, they realized the need to form social institutions. However, these social institutions introduced them to different vices like drinking, smoking and gambling. In the end, the morality of mankind was destroyed. Rousseau also argued that the effects of civilization and development of human societies disrupted man’ ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Western civilization.The political theory of John Locke and Jean Jacques Rousseau
The study will start with a discussion of the political theory of Locke, followed by a discussion of Rousseau’s political theory, and then end with how their thinking fits into the period of enlightenment. The political theory of John Locke John Locke can be regarded as one of the founding fathers of liberal philosophy
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
John Locke vs. Jean-Jacques Rousseau
It would be an interesting debate if ever, because these two great political philosophers posits a conflicting thesis about body politic. John Locke posits that body and its accompanying laws benefit the people and their property while Jean-Jacques Rousseau argued that the endorsement of a body politic is a trickery of the prevailing class that makes the inequality in society more permanent with the enforcement of its laws.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Jean Jacques Rousseau
mile, ou l'education, along with The Educational Theory presented by him were two of the most significant accomplishments by the fellow in the field of education. Discours sur les Sciences et les Arts (Discourse on the Sciences and the Arts), an essay written by Rousseau in 1750 became his source to fame as it became a prize winning essay.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Jacques Derrida
Writing and Difference wa' fir't publi'hed in 1967, and it contain' collection of e''ay' written by thi' author from 1959 to 1966. Thi' book ha' molded the contemporary French thought and hailed a' the landmark a' for the i''ue' it deal' with. Decon'tructioni'm i' the 'trategy of analy'i', mo't importantly applied to literature, philo'ophy and lingui'tic'.
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay
Application of Jacques Lacan's theories
"structures" are built, through which then meaning is produced within a particular person, system, or culture" (Wikipedia) The origin of the Structuralist movement lies in the work of Ferdinand de Saussure concerning the general linguistics, the apellation has come from the works of a French anthropologist Claude Levi-Strauss.
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
Jean-Jacques Rousseau
His legacy as a radical and revolutionary is perhaps best demonstrated by his most famous line, from his most important work, The Social Contract: "Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains." Jean Jacques Rousseau's Discourse on Inequality, written for the Academy of Dijon in 1754, is an attempt to answer the question "What is the origin of inequality among men, and is it authorized by natural law" Rousseau discusses two types of inequality, natural or physical and moral or political.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Jacques-Louis David
Following his father’s death, David’s mother placed him in the care of his uncles who were noted architects. They enrolled him in the
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Jacques-Louis David
But his definitive work is the painting ‘Death of Marat’ that features the propagandist assassinated in his bath. This painting ultimately led to fuel the fire of the hunger of the people and justifies a new government. Jean-Paul Marat is
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
On the other hand, John also includes some contents not found in the synoptic. He also portrays a different duration of the ministry of Jesus. With the perception of literary, the synoptic are written in the third person, hence a descriptive approach. The book
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Jean Jacques Rousseau
The social contract is also called a political contract. It is basically a contract among the members of a society. The citizens of a country or a society engage in an
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Let us find you another Essay on topic JOHN JACQUES RUSSEAU for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us