Argument against the Banning of Smoking - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
This paper contends that smoking bans imposed by the government are not justifiable as responses to the failure of markets, as risk reduction measures, or as preference shaping means. Banning of tobacco smoking acts to reduce the welfare of the public, via the prevention of optimal allocation of public places where smoking is permitted…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.1% of users find it useful
Argument against the Banning of Smoking
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Argument against the Banning of Smoking"

Download file to see previous pages Justification of the ambient environment regulation in the conventional sense is that there is a necessity in combating inefficiencies caused by the negative externalities (Troyer & Gerald 110). These negative externalities can be defined as the costs that the party responsible for the process that causes them does not bear. An example is a factory owner whose factory spews smoke into the environment, though he does not fully bear the costs that are linked to health risks, stench, and smoke produced by his factory. Most of these costs are moved to the neighbours of the factory. Outdoor pollution of the air involves negative externalities that that result in excessive polluting activity and the violation of rights of the pollution victim. Indoor pollution of the air, however, involves no such type of externality (Troyer & Gerald 110). The reason for this is that the person charged with the determination of how much smoking is allowed indoors has to bear the entire cost of their decision thus making them select the air cleanliness optimal level.
The vital difference between indoor and outdoor air is property rights. While outdoor air is considered common property, in essence, the owner of the building owns indoor air (Troyer & Gerald 111). This means that the owner of the building who can control the permitted amount of smoking permitted in his/ her building possesses the incentive to allow the right amount of smoking that maximizes the individual’s welfare in their building....
can control the permitted amount of smoking permitted in his/ her building possesses the incentive to allow the right amount of smoking that maximizes the individual’s welfare in their building. Since patrons select the buildings they visit based on costs and benefits of patronage, they are free to avoid the buildings that have air policies they do not concur with, or they could reduce the amount they would be willing to spend in these establishments. Workers at businesses allowing smoking also exercise control via demand of increased pay for compensation for un-pleasantries experienced due to smoking in their workplace. This argument shows that it is unnecessary to ban smoking since processes in the market will make sure that employees and patrons preferences as regards smoking either will be honoured or compensated (Troyer & Gerald 111). The attempt to use bans on smoking to influence norms in society is not wise as a policy (Reid 155). Smoking bans that are sweeping in nature are actually more likely to increase incidences of smoking. Most smokers pick up the habit at a young age because it is cool. The reason that makes it cool is that it is rebellious. The harder the forces against smoking coerce individuals into stooping smoking via involvement of governmental institutions and other establishments, the rebellious and cooler smoking, become (Reid 155). Smoking bans are also highly intrusive interventions and the actual reduction of smoking by these sweeping bans is not exactly clear. Even experts who advocate smoking bans to change social norms accept that this form of intrusive bans and regulations could result in a norm backlash. The argument on risk ignores the smoking preferences of citizens’ altogether (Reid 156). The assertion of this argument is that ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Argument against the Banning of Smoking Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Argument Against the Banning of Smoking Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Argument Against the Banning of Smoking Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Argument against the Banning of Smoking

Argument about smoking in malls

...? Argument about Smoking in Malls Introduction The issue of smoking in public places has long been a cat and mouse fight between activists and the big conglomerates that own gigantic companies that manufacture cigarettes and earn multibillions in terms of profits in the returns from cigarette sales. The activists have a harder time fighting as the revenue generated from cigarette manufacture and sale is huge. This paper brings forth the argument of whether cigarette smoking should be banned in malls or not. Pros and cons of each of the reasons that will be argued in this paper will be clearly outlined. The World Health Organization (WHO)...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

Smoking in Public this claim emerge along a number of lines. Similar to the argument that smoking bans infringe on human rights, the argument that smoking in public places causes air pollution is objected to on the grounds that restricting this constitutes a significant human rights violation. In addition to these arguments, a number of other arguments have been levied against smoking bans on economic grounds. Frequent businesses, most prominently bars and restaurants, indicate that while air quality is a concern, being forced to prohibit smoking significantly hinders...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Argument against Tax Bailouts

...May 13, Argument against Tax Bailouts 2008 economic crises, triggered by the collapse of the subprime mortgage industry in the US, resulted in a need for massive government bailouts to prevent a sudden decline of large corporations going into bankruptcy. A bailout, is essentially, a government taking tax payer dollars and giving it to corporations on the verge of bankruptcy, as the collapse of these too big to fail corporations would not only result in job less at said company but will also impact all other corporations that have business associated with this failing company (Bezdecheck, 5).There are many advantages and disadvantages to a tax bailout, some which will be discussed in this paper....
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Argument for and Against Education

...? Argument for and against Education By Argument for and Against Education Education is a basic human rightand an important component in the development of individuals, communities, and countries. However, it has experienced major transformations over the years, as human knowledge diversifies and their cultural and social structures become more complex. This has resulted in newer models of educational systems in different countries. Changes in society are continuous, and this poses a challenge to education, and the role it plays in society. Amid all the transformations in education, the role and quality of education in today’s societies continues to evoke great debate. In this paper, the concept of education will be addressed... from a...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Opinion argument for or against

...Putting good-performing and bad-performing together: for or against 2007 All in all, I approve putting the gifted kids in special classes, because as for me, it is only fair if they receive as much knowledge as they want and are able to handle. However, there are still some very important objections to this position, and they are not limited to the points of view that "students with lower scores will be deprived of the example and the competition they need" or because it is "undemocratic". In fact, these two arguments seem to me not strong enough to deprive the talented students with high motivation from getting the opportunities that they deserve and need. Generally, such gifted children are very...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

An Argument Against Platos Mimesis

...An Argument Against Plato’s Mimesis The philosopher Plato argued that poetry and literature in general leads people to an unhappy life. His conception of mimesis meant that literature was merely an imitation of true forms, and it therefore could not lead to any sort of knowledge. However, I am going to argue that literature can lead to knowledge and under no circumstances will it lead people to an unhappy life. I have chosen Homer’s The Iliad to illustrate my argument. To Plato, literature was immoral because it appeals to the emotional side of people. When people read a piece of literature, it causes an emotional response within them, and Plato felt that this was an undesirable...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Positive Impact of Banning Smoking in Public Places

...Positive Impact of Banning Smoking in Public Places Prewriting for a Thesis I strongly agree that smoking should be avoided in public places. Aside from creating air pollution, smoking does not provide any positive effects on the physical health of a person. Smoking increases the number of fatality each year due to the adverse health effects of the smoker. As an end result, people who are non-smokers also suffer from the health consequences of smoking. Thesis “Positive Impact of Banning Smoking in Public Places” Plan of Argument The preferences and possible point-of-views of both...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Teaching Plan against Smoking

...kept the exhaust fans of the washroom and kitchen turned on all the time so as to ensure proper ventilation of air inside the rooms. c. Anna was quite receptive to the information I gave her. I told Anna that second hand smoke poses great risks to young children because they have very low immunity against diseases as compared to adults. According to Associated Press (2006, para.1), “over one in five children are exposed to secondhand smoke at home, where workplace bans don’t reach. Those children are at increased risk of SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome; lung infections such as pneumonia; ear infections; and more severe asthma.” I further told her that the 2006 U.S....
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Argument For and Against Banning Smoking in Public Places

...Argument For and Against Banning Smoking in Public Places Number Introduction Smoking is an issue that involves everyone in the country since even if one does not smoke the smoke released by the smoker gets to him. There has been an argument on whether it is right to ban smoking in public places or not. This report considers both sides of the argument for the smokers and non-smokers. It looks at the reasons why smoking in public places should be banned and those reasons against banning...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Banning Smoking in Public Places

...analysis. Since this article aims to initiate public debate on the subject of banning smoking in public places, I was hoping that it would include data from prominent opinion polls. However, this information was lacking and the writer focused primary on individual comments from a professor from Boston University, a Director of forest and a director of research and policy at the campaign group Action on Smoking and Health. However, the article was able to present both sides of the argument regarding banning smoking in public places. I found this article in Google by searching for keywords ‘second hand smoke’ and ‘public...
6 Pages(1500 words)Annotated Bibliography
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Argument against the Banning of Smoking for FREE!

Contact Us