Nobody downloaded yet

Ralf Dahrendorf - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The main criticism that Ralf Dahrendorf had about sociologists was that realities of social conflicts were given very little attention and class was defined too narrowly with respect to advanced society. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.2% of users find it useful
Ralf Dahrendorf
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Ralf Dahrendorf"

Download file to see previous pages According to him, modern societies are more complex than what it is portrayed by the sociologists. He also believes that integration and consensus that are present in modern social structures have been ignored. Dahrendorf criticised the socialists for assuming a utopian and false representation of consensus, stability and social harmony1. He believed that in modern societies, hierarchies of authority were inevitable. Dahrendorf suggests that exercise of authority must be criterion for formation of class and not possession of private property. He is of the view that the society must be split up among those who command and those who obey and the conflict would be the struggle between those with and without authority2. This criticism is relevant to the Davis Moore analysis for explaining the rise of inequality and stratification in modern societies. According to Davis and Moore, members of a society must be distributed among a variety of social positions. Members in different positions enjoy different levels of authority. Dahrendorf’s argument that hierarchies of authority are inevitable can be used to explain rise of inequality and stratification in modern societies. Davis and Moore argue that social inequality is necessary and universal3. 2.What is the difference and similarity between Karl Marx and Max Weber's approaches for analyzing social stratification in capitalism? (Make sure you define clearly Weber’s and Marx’s definitions of class). How did Weber approach the study of stratification in capitalism and how did Marx approach it. The explanation of Marx and Weber are the most powerful explanations of social conflict. The explanations have some similarities and difference. According to Marx, ownership of property is what defines the class of an individual. There are three main classes according to Marxism: The bourgeoisie (own the means of production and profits is their source of income), the proletariat (labours who sell their labour for wage) and landowners (rent is the source of their income). But it is the conflict between the bourgeoisie and proletariat that mainly characterises the class structure4. Marx’s capitalistic approach was that the conflict between bourgeoisie and proletariat was a conflict between capitalists and wageworkers respectively. That is, control over the means of production (social production) also gave the capitalists control over the class that was involved in the production of goods. That the capitalists exploited the wage works. Weber’s theory of stratification was different from that of Marx as it was rooted in the belief that the education and skill of a person is what determines the class position and not their relationship to the means of production. Weber believed that the solution to stratification was in creation of equal opportunities within a capitalist competitive system. According to Weber social structure depended on three main factors: class, status and power5. Unlike Marx, Weber did not believe that ownership of capital was alone responsible for stratification. Weber defined class as the economic position of a person. 3.What does Marx mean by the circuits C-M-C to M-C-M? Explain what C AND M mean, what two characteristics does C have? What does Marx mean by exploitation and how does it relate to his analysis of the source of profit in capitalism? C-M-C and M-C-M are abstract circuits of exchange according to Marx which explains the transformation of money into capital. C means commodity and M means money in the circuit6. Something that can be bought and sold in a market, or even exchanged, is known as a commodity and it has following two ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Ralf Dahrendorf Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Ralf Dahrendorf Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“Ralf Dahrendorf Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document


Functionalism, And the Education in Society

.... Print. 5. Ololube, Nwachukwu P. Teacher Education, School Effectiveness and Improvement: A Study of Academic and Professional Qualification on Teacher's Job Effectiveness in Nigerian Secondary Schools. Helsinki: Dep. of Teacher Education, Univ. of Helsinki, 2006. Print. 6. Ritzer, George. Sociological Theory. New York [u.a.: McGraw-Hill, 2000. Print. 7. Schumaker, Paul, Will Delehanty, Dwight C. Kiel, and Thomas W. Heilke. From Ideologies to Public Philosophies: An Introduction to Political Theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub, 2008. Print. 8. Trevin?e, A. J. Talcott Parsons Today: His Theory and Legacy in Contemporary Sociology. Lanham [u.a.: Rowman& Littlefield Publ, 2001. Print. 9. Tischler, Henry L. Introduction to Sociology....
14 Pages(3500 words)Research Paper

The Driving Forcce of Social Change

...and institutions. However, the point of view of the conflict theory was completely opposite to that of the functionalist positions. This is best exemplified by the work of one of the important conflict theorists Ralf Dahrendorf (1950). The prominent writing of Dahrendorf on social inequality is “Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society” (1959). This work portrays a comprehensive description of the problem of disparity in the capitalist societies. Dahrendorf’s work recognized the class interests that concerned Marx. Like Marx, Dahrendorf also believed that conflict is still a fundamental element of social life, and the advancing outcome of class...
17 Pages(4250 words)Essay

Gain an understanding of Marx and apply the work of the theorist to a contemporary issue

...history. London: Verso, 2000. Churchich, Nicholas. Marxism and morality: a critical examination of Marxist ethics. Cambridge: Clarke, 1994. Churchich, Nicholas. Marxism and Alienation. Rutherford [N.J.: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1990. Coakley, Jay J, and Eric Dunning. Handbook of Sports Studies. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications, 2002. Dahrendorf, Ralf. Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. London: Routledge, 1959. Jessop, Bob and Russell Wheatley. Karl Marx’s social and political thought. New York: Taylor and Francis, Inc, 1999. Kraynak, Joe, and Mikal E. Belicove. The Complete Idiot's Guide to Facebook. New York: Alpha, 2010. Mandel, Ernest. An introduction to Marxist economic...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

The Constitution creates a system that was designed to fail AND the existence of a set of fundamental American values

..., characterized by characterized by fluctuating economy and changing societal perspectives, the long cherished American values are highly threatened. There seems to be little or no consensus on the values. Take for instance commitment to family, along cherished American value: many marriages are becoming unstable; more cases of divorce and separation are reported (Dahrendorf 17). Commitment to work is becoming undermined as individuals get to realize that employers may not be reciprocating by compensating a value commensurate with the work done, or may be laid off if economic depression comes and the firm needs to downsize (Yankelovich 20). Works Cited Dahrendorf, Ralf . Life Chances:...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Applying Sociology Concepts and Theories to the Events in the Book

...of the challenges and barriers in their current society and have thus come up with their own sub cultural manner different from their dominant cultural norm (MacLeod 2004). Theories Present in Ain’t No Makin It – Karl Marx, Ralf Dahrendorf and Max Weber A number of theories can be reflected from this book for instance the author mentions theorist such as Marx and Weber’s who talk about class structure. It is apparent that class structure is generated from one generation to the next through the schooling system (MacLeod 2004). According to Karl Marx, class is determined by income as well as the connection a group has to the means of production, creating a distinction between the working class and...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Sociology conflict theory

...CONFLICT THEORY INTRODUCTION: We have seen many theories of society that will help explain to us why some people act this way or that way. These many theories try to explain why person is sad or mad or glad or a just a plain old dad. BODY Conflict theory was spread like wildfire in Germany by Ralf Dahrendorf. in the United Kingdom by Max Gluckman and John Rex and in the United States by Lewis A. Coser and Randall Collins. Conflict theory(Rahim, 1990) shows us that the society or organization functions so that each individual member of the group and the groups themselves fight a day to day survival of the fittest struggle to maximize their benefits. This will surely contribute to social...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Family related to traditional,modern and postmodern societies

..., imagines society 'as an arena of inequality that generates conflict and change' (ibid.). There are many sociologists who take a conflict approach as their starting-point, including Ralf Dahrendorf. (Viviene E. Cree, 2000) More recent sociological approaches that reflect critical ideas have attempted to blend structural and interpretive theories to bring about a better understanding of the relationship between the individual and society. Habermas, for example, has argued that neither approach gives a satisfactory base for social theory on its own; instead, both are different aspects of social reality (Fulcher and Scott 1999:60). In addition, feminist and black sociologists have drawn attention to the...
19 Pages(4750 words)Essay

Do Multinational Corporations Exploit the Developing World

...members of the working class are included in the decision-making body of an organisation, in order to ensure that participatory management is made a reality. However, there are quite a few in the corporate sector who are quite sceptical about this move. Is this a cleverly orchestrated move on the part of the multinational to gain a footing in a strange land, or is it a genuine move that internalises worker power It is in this complex scenario that the pluralist thoughts of sociologists gain ground. Pluralism 'provides an opportunity for success for every interest that is voiced.'(Ralf Dahrendorf, 1959). Whether or not this participation is a reality, there is no doubt that there is a collective...
6 Pages(1500 words)Term Paper

Homo Economicus Myth or Reality that “this best case for the claim that economics explains everything about human behavior ultimately either fails to show that the explanation is particularly economic in any important sense, or else succeeds at explaining everything in its alleged domain only at the expense of explaining nothing”. [6]. As Woody Allen once said “Intellectuals are like mafia—they only kill each other.” So these confrontation amoung economists and other social scientists rage on. Comparisons between economics and sociology have resulted in a corresponding term Homo sociologicus introduced by German Sociologist Ralf Dahrendorf in 1958. Unlike economicus, sociologicus acts not to pursue selfish interests but to...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Function of Social Conflict important reservation: social conflict are able to have positive influence on the society only they when do not deal with the fundamental matters: otherwise would undermine the very basis of it which should not be allowed. There is another interesting approach towards the notion of social conflict in general and its function in particular that is expressed by Ralf Dahrendorf. This sociologist states that conflict is an irreplaceable prerequisite for the coexistence of different groups within the framework of one society (Dillon 218). What is more important is that Dahrendorf sees social conflicts in the dialectic union with harmony of the society: these two notions oppose each other,...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Ralf Dahrendorf for FREE!

Contact Us