Is Marx's explanation of social change still relevant to understanding capitalism today - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Name: Tutor: Course: Date: University: Marx theory of capitalism and social change The purpose of this study is to analyse the idea of social change as conceptualised by Karl Marx in his study of capitalism in traditional industrial society and examine whether his ideas still remain relevant in the present modern society…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.9% of users find it useful
Is Marxs explanation of social change still relevant to understanding capitalism today
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Is Marx's explanation of social change still relevant to understanding capitalism today"

Download file to see previous pages Buttel and newby (1980,p 85) notes that Marx theory of historical change identifies five periods in history, that is, ancient, feudal, capitalist, socialists, and communist .In all these historical periods, the societies that existed were characterised by history of class struggles and conflicts and it is because of what transpired that facilitated the movement from one period of history to the proceeding one. Therefore as the feudal system disintegrated and capitalism emerged, capitalism created contradictions .This Contradictions are what subsequently shaped society and brought about social change. . Long (2009) also re affirms that social change in capitalistic society, occurred due to contradictions between the major classes, that is, the bourgeoisie and proletarian McLaughlin et al (2003, p 249) notes the general Marxist theory central proposition is that the most important element in peoples lives in society is how they relate with the mode of production. The modes of production in society consists of two elements: the means of production, which is constituted of technological process and the relationship of various classes to the means of production whether they either own the means of production or work for those who posses them (Buthel and Newsby, p 89 ) Since the ultimate economic source of surplus in society involves the amount of goods which is produced in excess of what the workers consume, there is a need to understand the difference between those who hold the means of production and those who work for them so as to be able to comprehensively understand who owns the surpluses in society. (McLaughlin et al 2003, p 249) McLaughlin states that means of production in society can either be privately owned or not. In some societies, means of production are owned by state, for example in former soviet Union, in others they are controlled by small groups of workers for instance in Yugoslavia or collectively owned by units of workers, farmers, peasants and other classes in society for example in china This forms of production definitely produces different types of social relations. McLaughlin et al (2003, p 250) notes that in capitalistic societies particularly where means of production concentrates on private individuals, there has been a development of divisions between the class that dominates, that is, the owners of means of production and the class that is dominated, those working for the ruling class. This is because of the contradiction that is created by the capitalist system. Bottero (2005, p 35) add that the various classes in capitalistic societies have opposing economic interests and their relationship is usually antagonistic in nature. To begin with, the first contradiction is that the capitalist enterprise tries to create a desire among the class of workers to consume the products generated by their system. Many of these products do not necessarily contribute to the improvement of people’s well being and also have no value. For their system to be viable, the bourgeoisies develop mechanisms to make the people utilise what they produce. In order for the capitalist to produce their goods, they make labour force to work diligently and over time. This helps the ruling class to accumulate more and more ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Is Marx's explanation of social change still relevant to understanding Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Is Marx'S Explanation of Social Change Still Relevant to Understanding Essay)
“Is Marx'S Explanation of Social Change Still Relevant to Understanding Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Is Marx's explanation of social change still relevant to understanding capitalism today

What does Hobbes mean by sovereignty Is his understanding of this concept still relevant today

...? Hobbes Perception of Sovereignty and its Modern Day Relevance Introduction A nation is sovereign in situations where its magistrate owes loyalty to no greater power. As a result, the magistrate is supreme inside the legal order of the nation. In every social society where a system of law is present, there is also most likely to be found underneath the assortment of political forms, a latent democracy as much as in an absolute monarchy. In addition, a modest relationship between subjects executing expected obedience and a sovereign who extracts obedience to none also exists. This vertical construction of sovereign and subjects, rendering to this theory, is similar to the pillar of a man. The structure...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Are Trade Unions still relevant

...labour system has changed drastically over the past few years. The steel industry, auto industry, rail industry and many others are now characterised by decent working hours. Additionally, enumeration policies have adversely improved in today's production sector. Consequently, trade unions are left with little else to do. Their influence and applicability is slowly fading away. There are a number of reasons that can explain this phenomenon. Some of them can be attributed to social transformations while others are economical. Others are linked to the political opinions of the day. (House of Commons Trade and Industry Committee, 2007) The United Kingdom along with other developed nations...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Weber's and Marx Capitalism

.... While Marx and Weber's theories differ, it is not necessary to postulate that one negates the other. Though certain individuals find one argument more compelling than the other, capitalism, like many other social, economic, and psychological phenomena, has its roots in a variety of causes and can be attributed to a number of factors. Both sociologists commit the error of hubris when they submit that their analysis is the exclusive explanation for capitalist development. Works Cited: Tawney, R. H. Religion and the Rise of Capitalism. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc., 1926. Weber, Max. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Karl Marx and Capitalism it by Marx’s theory was not met by retaliation, but by appropriation of elements that it had to consider; left unconsidered these negative aspects could have meant the death of capitalism. The capitalist world today boasts of increased labor-freedom, more individual and collective benefits for the workers, and in effect, increased sympathy rather than antipathy toward its structure from the workers’ end. As one can clearly notice, Marx did not lend destructive blows to the foundations of capitalism. On the contrary, he let his own logic form a platform for its evolution and further growth, becoming one of its greatest ever singular champions. Works...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Aristotle's Model of Persuasion: Is It Still Relevant Today

... Aristotles Model of Persuasion: Is It Still Relevant Today? Aristotle is considered to be one of thefounders of modern western philosophy and is known for his many contributions to science and the liberal arts. Amongst his many writings is a famous work on Rhetoric which can also be considered the first important piece in the field of interpersonal communication. Even though more than two millennia have passes since the writing of the book, the suggestions and methods described by Aristotle are as valid today as they were when they were written. There are many reasons for that and they can be clarified with examples from our daily lives. Before such examples are given, it is important to take a brief look at the ideas presented... by...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

India''s Today

...adequate security in the South Asia region as well as the Indian Ocean region. These developments will allow the United States to reduce its military commitment in the region (Mohan, 2006). BIBLIOGRAPHY Chandramohan Balaji. “India’s Defence Budget, Strategic Orientation and Military Modernisation,” Future Directions International, August 15, 2014, Mohan, C. Raja. "India and the Balance of Power." Foreign Aff. 85 (2006): 17. Pandey, Gyanendra. "In defense of the fragment: writing about Hindu-Muslim riots in India today." Representations (1992): 27-55. Pei,...
4 Pages(1000 words)Book Report/Review

Is Marxs analysis of capitalism still valid today

... of Political Economy. New York: Courier Corporation. Schumpeter, J. (2013). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Routledge. Sperber, J. (2013). Is Marx still relevant?. [online] the Guardian. Available at: [Accessed 30 Mar. 2015]. Thompson, M. (2011). Georg Lukács reconsidered. London: Continuum. Zalta, E. (n.d.). Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, Calif.: Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.... IS MARX’S ANALYSIS OF CAPITALISM STILL VALID TODAY? By and Submission Carl Marx was an elemental figure in...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Marx on capitalism and communism important in understanding the belief that explains Karl Marx’s vision of the collapse of capitalism. This relationship opened up the socialist ideology dividing it into smaller pieces. The fundamentalist forms of socialism define their outright opposition to capitalism. On the other hand, capitalism reconciles with the revisionist socialism. Karl Marx is a fundamentalist socialist, holding the view that the capitalism is an irredeemable and fundamentally flawed ideology. In this context, socialism seeks to displace capitalism, by offering an...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Today's Architecture approval on the collection of primary data from architects and critics on their opinion relation to the issues of ethics and social responsibility in architecture and the strategies that can be implemented in architecture schools to augment adherence to ethics and social responsibility by graduate architects. References Chan, J. K. H. (2013). Teaching ethics in architecture: contexts, issues and strategies. Journal of the NUS Teaching Academy, 3(3), 85-99. Gray, M. (March 4, 2014). The Problem With Architecture Today (and the Solution). The Huffington Post. Retrieved from...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Capitalism and Social Change: Burke and Marx Critiques of Capitalism

...Capitalism and Social Change: Burke and Marx critiques of capitalismCapitalism is an economic system in which the private owners control the trade, industry and means of production to make profit, it mainly stresses on individual rights to maximize profits. Capitalism has been criticized throughout the history for many perspectives. One of the major aspects is the political and social change. Several scholars believe that the Capitalism is an unjustified system that shall be replaced by the different method of production and social organization....
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Is Marx's explanation of social change still relevant to understanding capitalism today for FREE!

Contact Us