Name: Subject: Instructor: Date: Gun Control: The Ethical Justification of Possessing Firearms The term gun control is at times understood as a counterpoint to the idea of gun rights, where the former is used to refer to the implementation of strict regulations and policies pertaining to firearm possession, while the latter refers to the position that upholds the presumably inherent right to possess firearms…
Download file to see previous pages...
The two sides of the debate showcase significant arguments. On one hand, it is argued that the ownership of firearms is a fundamental right, while on the other it is argued that there is no such fundamental right. Various studies and surveys on the effectiveness, as well as the ineffectiveness, of restrictions have been conducted, only to end inconclusively. A fairly recent survey by the Open Society Institute (2000) merely ranks the states of America based on the degree of toughness of their gun laws. The study states: The most striking results of this survey are a) the lack of uniformity in firearm regulation across the country; b) the enormous differential between the top and bottom of the spectrum; and c) the poor scores achieved by most states (Gun Control in the United States, 2000). These results demonstrate the difficulty and the highly varied attitudes toward gun control, despite arguments appealing to fundamental rights, and empirical data. Perhaps a philosophical examination will provide a sufficient ground for such arguments, particularly from the vantage point of ethical theories. The author attempts to provide an ethical justification for gun control by taking a look at two ethical frameworks: deontological or Kantian ethics, and utilitarian ethics. Ethical Justifications Pertaining to Gun Control: An Analysis As mentioned above, arguments both in favor and against gun control rely on fundamental principles to justify their positions, as well as on empirical, albeit inconclusive studies. But at its base, the issue is one that pertains to restrictions. Hence, if the claims are to be analyzed, it can be said that the propositions: a) “There should be strict and standardized restrictions on gun ownership,” b) “There should not be strict and standardized restrictions on gun ownership.” are both evaluative claims, supportable by properly examined moral or ethical principles, and perceived beneficial consequences. The first proposition draws its strength primarily from the premise that there is no such basic right as to own a gun. The proposition is further supported by the claim that self-defense by way of gun use is counterproductive, since some studies seemed to show that domestic violence is in fact increased as a result of the presence of firearms. The second proposition takes its strength from the premise that there is a fundamental right to own a gun, as stated in the Second Amendment. To push for strict regulation of gun ownership is to infringe on that basic right. It further strengthens its argument by claiming the exact opposite of the first proposition’s claim, that crime incidents are in fact lessened as a result of the presence of guns. In short, the two propositions both give statistics to support their claims. However, the author believes that a potential beneficial consequence must only be highly probable to sufficiently support the claim. From the perspective of Kantian ethics (“Metaphysic of Morals,” 1898), it might be argued that the insistence on having the right to own guns is grounded on the fundamental moral duty of self-preservation. If this idea of self-preservation is extended to accommodate acquiring the means for the latter, then gun ownership is justifiable. An act that is done out of duty has moral weight, as opposed to one that is done only out of conformity to duty
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Gun control Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/sociology/1397010-gun-control
(Gun Control Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“Gun Control Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/sociology/1397010-gun-control.
The paper presents that the debate over guns that is not likely to disappear in the near future nor does it seem to reach a mutual agreement. The advocates are passionate on both sides and have a strong standing on their viewpoint. The government has drafted out several laws to suppress guns but the question Do gun- control laws work cannot be answered.
While statistical evidence demonstrates that many countries where stringent gun control has been enacted do have relatively low murder rates, it’s also accurate that the murder rates in these countries was already low before the gun control mechanisms were enacted.
Those who are in favor of gun ownership argue that the same can protect the civilians from aggression. On the other side, those who are in favor of gun control argue that gun control can reduce violence in the society. Still, modest restrictions on civilian gun ownership prove that the same cannot guarantee the lives of civilians in general.
The problem is the lack of gun control while the real issue of gun control is deeper than it seems. It is actually an issue that is beset by several political obstacles as well as an inefficient enforcement of the current gun laws. Nevertheless, in order to put an end to the killings, there should be gun control measures in the United States and these measures should be strictly enforced by the federal government.
The very idea of gun reflects a sign of danger and a common man feels endangered whenever he confronts a gun. It has been witnessed that the Americans have been in possession of private guns more than any developed economies. At present more than one-third of the American households possess a working firearm.
Currently, both the national and state governments have provisions concerning gun ownership. However, there is a diverse opinion of states over the issue. Some states lack any form of regulation while others have stringent gun control laws. Although the gun control laws came into place in order to curb murder rates, an analysis into the realistic data reveals otherwise.
Going by the scope of the issue being discussed, the word ‘arms’ here predominantly means fire arms or guns. A recent spate in the incidents of violence associated with guns in the nation has given way to an intense debate regarding enacting
From one side, there are a lot of cases, when a person has to take care of himself and defend himself or his family from dangers. From another side, there are a lot of cases, when mentally unstable people use the weapons and hurt other people. Thus, there are the
8 Pages(2000 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Gun control for FREE!