These laws infringe upon the constitutional right of an individual, with respect to the bearing of arms, which is provided for by the Second Amendment to the US Constitution.
The various interventions…
Download file to see previous pages...
During this period, most of the murders were committed with handguns. Second, since 1911, New York had imposed a handgun licensing law, which proved unequal to the task of reducing violent crime in this city. Third, the federal Gun Control Act of 1968 imposed stringent restrictions on the possession and bearing of firearms, throughout the US (Preface to "Deterring Gun Violence"). However, this measure was ineffective, as is borne out by the fact that in comparison to the five years preceding the enactment of this act, the murder rate of the US, after the enactment of this act, showed a 50% increase. In the five years following this period, the murder rate showed a 75% increase, and in the 5 year period after that the increase was 81% (Preface to "Deterring Gun Violence"). As such, in the US crime rate was enhanced much, when gun control laws were in operation. Gun control laws were unsuccessful in controlling the crime in the US.
The case of District of Columbia v Heller, dealt with the right to own firearms in the US. In this case, a special policeman attempted to register a handgun in the District of Columbia. However, his application was rejected on the grounds that handguns could not be possessed in the home. The case was brought before the Supreme Court, which ruled that individuals had the right to own firearms. In addition, the Court clarified as to who could own a firearm, namely whether a state supported militia or individuals (District of Columbia v Heller ).
The Supreme Court ruled that the individual was entitled to own a firearm. While providing this ruling, the Court detached the practice of individual gun ownership from the service of that individual in a state militia. The ban on handguns by the District of Columbia was held to be in violation of the Second Amendment to the US Constitution (District of Columbia v Heller ). With this decision, it became very clear as to who was entitled to bear firearms. The Court stressed that
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Gun Control/ Argumentative paper against Gun Control Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/english/1583294-gun-control-argumentative-paper-against-gun-control
(Gun Control/ Argumentative Paper Against Gun Control Essay)
“Gun Control/ Argumentative Paper Against Gun Control Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/english/1583294-gun-control-argumentative-paper-against-gun-control.
The Firearms Act established strict registration for gun owners. It also imposed a transfer tax on both short-barreled long guns and machine guns. The Gun Control Act prohibits the sale of firearms between states, mail-order sale of firearms, transfer of firearms to minors and establishes strict licensing requirements for dealers, manufacturers and importers of firearms.
The article begins by delving on a knee jerk reaction of the National Rifle Association after the Tucson shooting in deciding to be low profile and evasive, citing the reasons of sympathy with the victims. However, the very same article slowly and gradually tends to build a support around the issue of the controversial right to bear arms by mentioning varied affiliated organizations and politicians, who think that the concerned shooting will have but a little impact on the right to bear arms.
This paper wills advice on the policy development steps that the current President of US will have to take in order to implement a policy that will control guns. The paper will also discuss the implementation and evaluation processes of the policy. Gun control policy development Introduction Calls for tighter gun control have been occasioned by the deadly shooting of innocent children at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut where more than 20 children and six adults lost their lives.
The public opinion regarding the gun control debate has been almost equally distributed. PEW research claims in its study that 5&% of the total population sides with stricter laws, while the remaining 43% sides with relaxed laws of gun control (PEW 1). Those in the favor of strict gun control laws argue that such laws will decrease criminal incidences involving the use of guns, these laws will even ensure that those who have the capacity to make rational decisions are only armed and they even argue that criminals are not in a capacity to make rational decisions so taking away guns from them is the right option.
According to social regulatory policy theory, certain distinctive political patterns and characteristics are associated with social regulatory issues related to gun control. These patterns are observable among the major elements of the political process, including the political behavior of the courts, interest groups, the presidency, political parties,
What could be the reasons that for some people developing personality becomes so challenging
One of the most important aspects in personal Development is perseverance. One may have the required qualities but to really implement those qualities in the real situation he need to persevere.
The functional process model must be follow to enact permanent and progressive change within in the United States as America's culture is infiltrated with guns. Therefore, results will not take place overnight and there will be incredible backlash, but the right to bear handguns should be revoked and the Second Amendment of the United States will have to be altered to make possible a safer America.
The importance of guns in routine fights and robberies is that they intensify violence by spreading terror thereby increasing the likelihood of death. “Because guns increase the scope and lethality of violence, keeping them away from violent encounters is a vital public goal, which is distinct from the goal of reducing overall violence rates”.
but more importantly the process in which guns are purchased; their opponents are Gun Rights Supports, it is their argument that the more restriction that are levied the more citizens rights are being infringed upon. A closer look at the portion of the 2nd Amendment that is the
ormulated such that people do not easily access guns and the police force should be reoriented about the measures they can take when dealing with a riotous crowd rather than just opening fire. As such, this paper is going to explore the reasons why stricter gun control is not
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Gun Control/ Argumentative paper against Gun Control for FREE!