The intention of this study is gay marriages, that is, marriage between people of same gender, have been an issue of debate since centuries. Kertbeny coined the term “homosexuality” suggesting that as homosexuality is endowed by nature, it is unethical to prevent them from basic human rights. …
Download file to see previous pages...
The opening of the thesis report consists of the history of gay marriage. In the civilizations as ancient as Mesopotamia evidences have been found proving the existence of the gay marriages. A number of documents have been found in Mesopotamia containing an account of the different types of marital practices and none of the laws were against the gay marriages, even when they had proper regulations for marriages. Even in Egypt some artifacts have been found which validates the existence of gay marriages. A pharaonic tomb on ancient Egypt clearly shows that even the kingdom accepted the gay marriages. Plato’s symposium that was found in ancient Greece clearly depicted the cases of same-sex attractions and relationships. Some Greek artworks also show the social prevalence of this equality. Even the epics like Lliad and Odyssey contains some passages which talks about the presence of homosexual relationships. Some examples of gay unions have also been found in Greece like those between student and pupil of the same gender. In Rome, the proofs have been found regarding the presence of homosexual relationships of the roman emperors. Thus we can clearly see that the gay marriages were thoroughly accepted by the society in the early history but over time a negative attitude developed towards the same-sex unions. In the modern history gay marriages can be traced back to 1989 in Scandinavia, when Denmark was the first country to recognize the gay marriages legally as “registered partnership”. ...
Some examples of gay unions have also been found in Greece like those between student and pupil of the same gender. In Rome, the proofs have been found regarding the presence of homosexual relationships of the roman emperors. Thus we can clearly see that the gay marriages were thoroughly accepted by the society in the early history but over time a negative attitude developed towards the same-sex unions (A History of Gay Marriage, n.d., p. 56). In the modern history gay marriages can be traced back to 1989 in Scandinavia, when Denmark was the first country to recognize the gay marriages legally as “registered partnership”. Then the other countries like Norway, Sweden also gave the recognition to the gay marriage. Netherland became the first country to grant gay marriages the same status as the conventional opposite sex marriage (A History of Gay Marriage, n.d., p.58). Comparison between State and Federal rights: Federal government passed the Defence of Marriage Acts in 1996, signed by the President Bill Clinton which defined marriage as the union between people of opposite genders and that the same sex marriages will not be recognized by the federation. It also allowed the states the freedom to recognize or not recognize the homosexual marriages. After this act many of the States legalized the gay marriages, civil unions or domestic partnerships and some other states declared that the same-sex marriages licensed in the other states as invalid under their constitution. This happened as the law of “full faith and credit”, which ensured that the laws made by a state to be respected by the other states, was also made optional in the Defence of Marriages Act (Hartman, 2012, p. 187). The main issue
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“The aspect of equality with respect to Gay marriage Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/sociology/1394914-the-aspect-of-equality-with-respect-to-gay-marriage
(The Aspect of Equality With Respect to Gay Marriage Research Paper)
“The Aspect of Equality With Respect to Gay Marriage Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/sociology/1394914-the-aspect-of-equality-with-respect-to-gay-marriage.
It is due to this that natural human norms are being violated in the name of rights. I believe man and a woman were created with a purpose. The biological structure of human beings works distinctively as per the organs involved. It is sad to find that there are people going against their body feelings at the detriment of their health.
However, a few governments have already started formalizing same-sex marriages. The most important argument put forward by the proponents of the same-sex marriage is that denying this right amounts to denying universal human rights. However, gay marriage is not normal, for it violates the nature’s law as the tendency of homosexuality is only one among the many sexual deviations experienced in humans.
Though once viewed as strongly against the religious belief, moral values and ethics, and had been vehemently criticized by an overwhelming majority of the people at large all over the world, several western countries have allowed the practicing of the same provided both the parties to the contract exercise gay sexual union with free consent and without coercion or undue influence.
Conservatives and modernists are often the people engaged in such debates because of the clash of what people have been used to and the growing changes of highly technological era. However, concerns about the impact of tolerating the matter in many aspects of life should be seriously considered because it is actually the people who are creating the world they are to live.
It has turned out to be the most socially divisive and ethically challengeable issue of the decade. The reason behind its controversial stature in society is that apart from upholding the right for freedom of choice and unconditional love, this issue paves the way for several alarming problems.
To achieve this, the article analyses the content of Canadian newspaper coverage on the issue of same-sex marriage during the debate between September 2003 and the federal election of June 2004. The article establishes the role of Canadian newspapers in addressing Canadian values and most specifically same-sex marriage.
operly raised their children, which undermines the arguments of anti-gay marriage that gay couples raise children with poor self-esteem and gender identity issues. The primary issues of Obama’s support focused on equality and fairness in law. Indeed, if fairness is considered,
They long for acceptance, respect, justice, and freedom to love and marry with their partners whose sexual preferences are the same to their own gender. With this, the present paper would like to compare two different views from the two different