Conflict Between Civilizations - Essay Example

The cultural basis is the major source of conflicts in the world.

The new phase of global politics is faced with significant conflicts. People from different countries have risen against each other with rivalry. Could the different levels of civilization be triggering the conflicts? Countries have indulged each other in conflicts; they cannot even explain the origin or the cause. Although the nations may not be aware, the conflicts do protect not only their cultural ideas but also other aspects like economic expansion (Huntington, 28). The extra benefits are gained when civilizations with similar cultures work together in engagements like economic regionalism, leading to the establishment of their specific countries and the entire region. Knowing and realizing the importance of cultural characteristics enhances civilization-consciousness, pushing into conflict with each for the establishment of these ideas. Therefore, the major source of global conflicts is cultural-based. The civilizations emerging in evolution believe they cannot change who they are but can comprise other aspects like political and economic ideologies.

Evolution induces many changes and aspects in the affected settings, and conflict is a primary aspect of the global evolution. Huntington (22) argues that conflict between civilizations will crown the latest phase of global evolution to modernity. Although the different countries will have achieved and adopted much in modern developments, they will still fight over believes and norms. Most of the historical fights occurred due to a misunderstanding between leaders such as princes and monarchies (Huntington, 23). However, modernization has changed the effect of global conflicts on the nations as all the people are involved in protecting their ideas. The difference originates from the aim of the conflict. While the leaders could fight for issues such as the expansion of their territories, the people in different countries are fighting for cultural based biases like equality in aspects such as gender (Said, 11). Revolution raised the platform for people to understand themselves and fight for what they own irrespective of the challenges like counteracting more developed and superior countries. Besides, they are equipped with significant civilization levels though they may not be in the same position as the rival. What matters in the conflict between civilizations is the idea triggering the fight and not issues like economic development.

The countries in the revolutionized world will fight to correct past faults against the people involved. Evolution enables people to accept themselves by understanding that vital changes come through working on the drawbacks, entangling them to the past and current failures. In this case, the fault line becomes the battle lines to achieve a better future (Said, 11). The major cause of the fight is the fault that has lived with the people, not because they did not know of its existence but possibly because they did not know to change the situation. Thus, the revolutions in modern politics and civilization create awareness, and the people in various countries know how well to solve past faults like racism that may be affecting their present (Huntington, 22). Cultural issues are passed to incoming generations, and people being undermined based on their skin color are sure their children would have a similar experience since the other race is building the basis in their children. Thus, evolution has enhanced civilization in the inferior termed countries, preparing them adequately for a severe battle towards their recognition in the society. On the other hand, the countries inducing the faults are also embracing civilization, meaning they will dispute change. Therefore, the disagreement results in conflicts.

The desire to realize civilization identity yields conflicts as every identity fights for dominance and recognition of its importance. According to Huntington (25), the differences in various civilizations are not only real but also basic to the members. The most important aspect of differentiating civilizations is religion. While people in different civilizations accord their religions great honor, they do not consider the significance of the other religions. Religion is a belief in the aspect of having faith in a certain superior being. Thus, what would stop people from fighting for the respect and acceptance of their religion? Besides, the religion's preparation keeps them moving, and they would never joke or allow the people around them to dishonor their beliefs (Said, 12). On the other hand, the differences will remain intact as long as the people in the civilizations continue reproducing. Huntington (25) states that they cannot disappear. In this case, civilizations must fight to protect their civilization identities. The world cannot turn to the point of having all the people believe in one civilization, even in simple aspects like language. The differences in civilization are more fundamental than variations in political and economic ideologies (Huntington, 25). Thus, the former is bound to yield violent conflicts easily that the latter.

Evolution has turned the world into a small village, increasing the interactions between people from different civilizations. For example, “North African immigration to France generates hostility among Frenchmen and at the same time increased receptivity to immigration by "good" European Catholic poles” (Huntington, 25). The two communities would fight over what they believe in as their civilizations command different aspects. The Frenchmen had a basis for their hostility. One, the entry of North Africans would induce cultural beliefs that dispute their native norms. The difference in civilization would hence result in conflict since both groups would fight for what they own. While the French civilizations think the immigrants should honor and live with what they have built their ideas on, they would want to continue living with their identity without alteration. This difference would to ought to enact the basis of conflict for the two different civilizations. On the other hand, the Frenchmen had the reason to fight due to the increased receptivity to the immigration of European Catholic poles (Huntington, 25). The demographic willing to accept the incoming immigrants' ideas was bound to alter their beliefs, and they could not the event take place. The major basis is not about the people adhering or deviating but the dominance of France's civilization identity without interference.

Civilizations are also conflicting on the origin of the evolution and the conscious realization of their developments. The growth and spread of civilization-consciousness have escalated to the great levels due to the impact in the dual role played by the West (Huntington, 26). Also, the part holds power at great levels such that the civilizations in the area feel like they have the world in their control, with everyone in their arms. What would happen if the other civilizations agree to the idea? The West would take control of everything by forcing global populations to accept and live by their ideas. In this case, the non-west civilizations fight the power in the desire to attain equality in the distribution. Although there may be discussions between people from two geographical areas, they cannot solve the underlying issues in power and civilization. The non-west communities understand that colluding with the West has power at peak would put them on the verge of getting adopted to abide by their cultural ideas. Holding power means controlling everything, including pushing people to believe in your ideas even if they are wrong. The consideration of the future of the non-west civilizations in aspects like maintaining the ideas pushed them to fight. The civilizations desire to build their nations and the world in non-western methods (Huntington, 26). Thus, they have to effectively fight for the division of power so that both parts can participate in shaping the world into what they have always desired even before evolution.

Muting or compromising cultural characteristics may not be possible, unlike the cases of political and economic aspects. Civilizations may overlook to resolve the latter but decide to protect the former in every way possible (Huntington, 27). This stance reveals the importance of cultural characteristics in civilization identity, explaining the involvement of conflicts in securing the ideas. While the poor can become rich and the rich become poor, communists can become democrats in the past Soviet Union, but civilizations such as Russians cannot be Estonians (Huntington, 27). Hence, civilizations fight for dominance and realization of their ideas despite the availability of any other identity. This stance includes the conflicts between civilizations in a similar country. Eventually, the two groups will differ because they have different opinions. Thus, civilizations have to fight, considering that they cannot comprise their cultural characteristics and also change who they are regarding their beliefs.

Economic regionalism has increased with evolution, pulling the people with almost if not similar cultural characteristics. The independency is bound to trigger conflicts as populations fight to establish their regions despite any existing challenges like country differences. This engagement could be described considering a division like the distinctions in the different continents in the world. Economic regionalism reinforces a significant platform for civilization-consciousness, where the different regions understand their cultures better and stand for their realization (Huntington, 27). The acquisition of common culture not only aid in ensuring the dominance of the ideas but also facilitates expansion of economic relations between the countries in the region (Huntington, 28). The civilizations get more of the reason to conflict with other for the establishment of their ideas because it raises other benefits in the economic ideologies and expansion.

The conflicts among civilizations in the revolutionized world have cultural basis. The different civilizations from different countries fight for the acceptance and dominance and acceptance of their beliefs. The different civilization fight to correct past cultural faults, making the rectification processes the battle line. Evolution has also enhanced civilization-consciousness among different countries, resulting to conflicts in protecting identify in issues such as religion. The turning of the word into a small area by revolution has led to increased interactions that trigger conflicts as people believing in different cultural perspectives come together. Non-west civilizations conflict the fact that evolution originated from the West and the latter owns power at peak, meaning it has the capacity to push the other area to adopting their cultural aspects. Hence, non-west indemnities fight to protect their beliefs from eradication by the powerful west civilizations. Cultural characteristics are vital and cannot be comprised. Thus, they are the major causes of conflicts in the revolutionized world.

Read More

On the other hand, the differences will remain intact as long as the people in the civilizations continue reproducing. Huntington (25) states that they cannot disappear. In this case, civilizations must fight to protect their civilization identities. The world cannot turn to the point of having all the people believe in one civilization, even in simple aspects like language. The differences in civilization are more fundamental than variations in political and economic ideologies (Huntington, 25). Thus, the former is bound to yield violent conflicts easily that the latter.

Evolution has turned the world into a small village, increasing the interactions between people from different civilizations. For example, “North African immigration to France generates hostility among Frenchmen and at the same time increased receptivity to immigration by "good" European Catholic poles” (Huntington, 25). The two communities would fight over what they believe in as their civilizations command different aspects. The Frenchmen had a basis for their hostility. One, the entry of North Africans would induce cultural beliefs that dispute their native norms. The difference in civilization would hence result in conflict since both groups would fight for what they own. While the French civilizations think the immigrants should honor and live with what they have built their ideas on, they would want to continue living with their identity without alteration. This difference would to ought to enact the basis of conflict for the two different civilizations. On the other hand, the Frenchmen had the reason to fight due to the increased receptivity to the immigration of European Catholic poles (Huntington, 25). The demographic willing to accept the incoming immigrants' ideas was bound to alter their beliefs, and they could not the event take place. The major basis is not about the people adhering or deviating but the dominance of France's civilization identity without interference.

Civilizations are also conflicting on the origin of the evolution and the conscious realization of their developments. The growth and spread of civilization-consciousness have escalated to the great levels due to the impact in the dual role played by the West (Huntington, 26). Also, the part holds power at great levels such that the civilizations in the area feel like they have the world in their control, with everyone in their arms. What would happen if the other civilizations agree to the idea? The West would take control of everything by forcing global populations to accept and live by their ideas. In this case, the non-west civilizations fight the power in the desire to attain equality in the distribution. Although there may be discussions between people from two geographical areas, they cannot solve the underlying issues in power and civilization. The non-west communities understand that colluding with the West has power at peak would put them on the verge of getting adopted to abide by their cultural ideas. Holding power means controlling everything, including pushing people to believe in your ideas even if they are wrong. The consideration of the future of the non-west civilizations in aspects like maintaining the ideas pushed them to fight. The civilizations desire to build their nations and the world in non-western methods (Huntington, 26). Thus, they have to effectively fight for the division of power so that both parts can participate in shaping the world into what they have always desired even before evolution.

Muting or compromising cultural characteristics may not be possible, unlike the cases of political and economic aspects. Civilizations may overlook to resolve the latter but decide to protect the former in every way possible (Huntington, 27). This stance reveals the importance of cultural characteristics in civilization identity, explaining the involvement of conflicts in securing the ideas. While the poor can become rich and the rich become poor, communists can become democrats in the past Soviet Union, but civilizations such as Russians cannot be Estonians (Huntington, 27). Read More