In justifying the correlation between wages and crime rates, NBER analyzed how wage disparity contributes to the difference in crime rates between different races in the country. The disparity on the wages and crime rates involved comparing blacks and whites. In terms of crime rates, the NBER researchers found that the rates of Blacks involvement in crime was one-third more than whites (par. 9). Accordingly, the researchers concluded that Blacks were involved more in crime than whites because they earn less compared to their counterparts.
This, therefore, meant that the differences in crime rates are partly attributed to the labor market phenomenon. In fact, President Obama relied on these researches that have found that an increase in wages results in a reduction in crime rates to propose an increase in the minimum wages. According to Obama, increasing the minimum wages is necessary because it will result in an increase in the purchasing power of American households for those earning the minimum (Strasser par. 8). This would, in turn, stimulate economic growth due to the increase in consumption and employment creation.
The end result is that more jobless youths will get employed, thereby resulting in a reduction in the rates of crime (Downes 397). In fact, some economists have supported the idea citing that the rate of crime in the country has been decreasing since the government increased the minimum wage earned by its population, something that has helped stimulate economic growth, increased consumption and jobs. Despite the prove provided by the studies regarding the effectiveness of pay rise in making the society better by increasing the purchase power of individuals, as well as increasing job creation, the majority of economists, however, have rejected the findings of these studies.
The majority of economists do not believe that pay rise make the society any better or helps in tackling crime in the society. Accordingly to the majority of economists, increasing the minimum wages or pay of workers has harmful effect on the economy, which is bad for the society. They argue that an increase in pay has an inflationary effect in the sense that it triggers an increase in the cost for businesses, which in turn, results in an increase in prices for basic commodities (Strasser par. 5). Accordingly, the economists who hold this view state that the inflationary effect triggered by an increase in the pay of workers only makes life difficult for the rest of the population since it makes the prices of basic commodities to rise to a level that cannot be afforded by low income earners.
As such, they are strongly opposed even to the idea of President Obama of increasing the minimum wages for federal contractors arguing that such a move will do more harm to the economy than good. The economists have also rejected the argument that increasing the pay of workers will result in job creation. Instead, the mainstream economists claim that making such a move is detrimental to the society like America that is still struggling to create jobs to its population. They argue that increasing the pay of workers will result in significant job loss that are currently available for the unskilled workers since the move will force businesses to substitute the higher cost employees with capital investment.
In fact, the economists have linked the 18% unemployment rate among youths presently to the increase in the minimum wages implemented recently (Downes 395). The rise in unemployment among the unskilled laborers will prove detrimental to the society since it will trigger an increase in crime rate among the unskilled laborers, according to mainstream economists. In conclusion, the debate as to whether or not increasing the pay can make the society better and reduce crime rates today has been going on for many years now.
However, from the literature, it becomes clear that opinion is divided as to the effectiveness of pay increase in transforming the society.
Read More