Drug Use in the College and Work Environment - Coursework Example

Drug Use in the College & Work Environment Drugs play a much different role in modern society than they useddecades ago. Among the drugs that have a massive usage by students in college are marijuana and alcohol (Gardner, John, Jewler, and Betsy 98). Like in the business world, where a very influential and successful businessperson may be in doing drugs and alcohol taking and still be successful, the trend in today’s society depicts scholars in college in the same route. College students can be successful while known to be using marijuana in their workplace. Even though statistics implore that marijuana, use may increase the risk of academic and performance problems, in the business world, Steve Jobs and Carl Sagan and many hosts of others have never had academic problems or lapse in their enterprise despite their use of marijuana (Flowers 98). Whether smoking marijuana and taking beer brings irresponsibility in someone, is a theorem that should not apply to discriminate those who are on the positive side of it. According to one of student in Preston college, marijuana smoker (Jonny Green), smoking weed makes a student languish in memory is a stereotype. His perception towards that notion is that this was the biggest pet peeves he had to deal with. Many of the college mates could always presume that they were more intelligent than he could manage. His example serves to exonerate weed smokers that in the work place, college students can as well be successful (Flowers 95). This allegation, of him being less intelligent, arose simply because he continuously smoked throughout his course time in college. On the side of the colleagues, the fact that they did not smoke marijuana made them more intelligent (Gardner, John, Jewler, and Betsy 167). One would want to refute this claim from the colleagues since as much as one has never smoked weed, that may not be a universal observation that all and sundry are intelligent. What comes to those who are less intelligent and they have neither seen nor smoked weed? The same aspect arises in Jonny’s case study and his history in smoking weed. This may not serve as a conclusion that all who have smoked marijuana during their school days have graduated as the most intelligent (Malone 88). A college student, who manages to successfully scale the ladders of his studies and pass with a high mark, should still face less restriction as to his use of marijuana or alcohol in his business world. Like the earlier proposition, personality influences a lot, the idea of drugs taking (Trevouledes 107). The stereotypes attached to those who smoke weed is something Jonny had to deal with almost for half of his life, and he wondered whether there are college students who still find a challenge in dealing with such stereotypes. Jonny asserts that as a college student, he managed to smoke all through, his teachers and colleagues knew about it, but what was more important is his mind focusing on the bigger goal of success in academics (Flowers 112). As he asserts, marijuana or alcohol is worth taking, and its side effects depend on the takers desired objective. Jonny says that he graduated from college successfully, and on top of all that, he won the honor as the ‘student of the year’ for that course/program (Trevouledes 65). The fact that Jonny still managed to balance his academics successfully while still smoking weed is a perfect example to justify that weed smoking may not necessarily impinge on one’s performance. According to Jonny’s case study, it is true that college students can smoke weed and still be successful in their majors, even after college. This is a proposition that would span a lot of debate, as to whether marijuana gets in the way of success in college and delivery during one’s occupational endeavors (Gardner, John, Jewler, and Betsy 105). Nevertheless, looking at Jonny’s case, yes, college students can still be successful while taking marijuana; therefore, in their work place also, they can effectively deliver in line with specified objectives while still smoking marijuana or taking alcohol. Edward M. Czuprynski, one of four panel members who sat for the debate on legalization of marijuana in Delta College confessed that if an individual used marijuana or alcohol in a more responsible way, it did not matter as long as it adds to his success (Flowers 90). In interpreting Edward’s ideas, he seems to proclaim that in an event where one’s use of marijuana results into deteriorating effects, then that is not responsible use and vice versa. In Michigan debate, Edward’s contention is that marijuana could be good for college students for not only their academic success but also least affect their business occupations later. In influencing someone’s success, Edward went on to show that marijuana has the same impact as taking alcohol. To him, if anyone, including college students, used these substances responsibly and sensibly, they brought less spoil (Trevouledes 77). The two substances are just mere social stuff and an individual should not allow them to come between their successes. Edward’s claims reflects the earlier argument that the personality of the individual or the intent of smoking marijuana is what should be the basis for confronting whether taking these drugs would deter any college student of being successful in their occupation. According to many successful students in the Michigan Delta College, the campaign to make marijuana illegal stems from the conceived belief that marijuana legalization may act as a gateway drug into many other illegal (Gardner, John, Jewler, and Betsy 70). The percentage rise in the use of marijuana in colleges, especially in the U.S.A, could serve as a rationale to its positive impact. One should consider that the scholars who are at University or college level are relatively bright fellows, and just like in the business world, the careful use of marijuana as a social substance does not influence negatively their success, be it inside the academic period or after the school life. Most of these users end up being very successful people of high intellect (Trevouledes 120). Statistics show that 67% of 18 to 29 years old youths, the exact age of being in college, support the legalization of cannabis. Despite the undying call to ban cannabis use among college and in the society in general since 1969, a Gallup poll released recently indicate that majority of the post teenage youths and adults back the legalization of cannabis (Flowers 55). The proposition put forward by professional researchers like those that Michael Kenney, professor of international affairs at the University of Pittsburgh, admits into saying that every year, millions of otherwise law-abiding citizens end up smoking cannabis. Accordingly, this does little to affect their success in whichever field of occupation, be it in their business world or other areas of their occupation. The professor even concludes that young people, not a big whoop anymore, do not necessarily look down the drug upon anymore. This seems to receive much support from Karilla Dyer, a junior student at the University of Florida, admitting that using cannabis among the most successful scholars is the norm in colleges. However, she does not deny to the fact that very few people have not tried the drug since smoking marijuana comes as a lifestyle choice for everyone. This 21 teenager concludes that smoking marijuana in a social setting, just to relax should compare with that person who is taking a glass of wine or alcohol (Gardner, John, Jewler, and Betsy 85). This begs the question as to how many successful graduates of the college are outside in the society, doing successful business yet they smoke weed every day, as innovators and job creators’ hence a reasonable ground to conclude that pot is not something that ruins scholar lives. In addition, in collegiate athletics, as insiders would contend, the actual percentage of student-athlete marijuana users is much higher yet they perform at their highest capabilities (Fertman 78). This is a true assumption owing to the report released by the Virginia State in U. S. A. The fact that these athletes graduate from college and continue being successful in their endeavors in life after college, like being innovative leaders in their industry related ventures, even though they smoke weed, is a positive claim that college weed smokers can still be successful in life. For example, a year after the federal prosecutors pointed out that California grown marijuana found market among many college athletes, at the championship competitions, positive tests for marijuana came life. This was an enormous increase in one academic year given the span of time from 28 users in 2008-2009 competitors to 71 positive users’ tests (Fertman 123). One would wonder why a college student would use cannabis before a championship exercise. The conclusion to this situation is that marijuana, like the wine taken by rich and successful individuals around the globe in the business world, makes the athletes swift. The same may apply to college students claiming the right to smoke weed at their work environment. As long as they deliver, these college graduates should have the privilege to enjoy their marijuana smoking. This might be a myth too much research, but the stimulations of nerve associated with marijuana use might as well account for such an increasing rise of its use in many upcoming successful college athletes. The fact that many world-renowned athletes, without going personal, always feel guilty of using marijuana before, and in the midst of their preparations for races explains its widespread preference for college students to transfer that desire for marijuana even at their work place. Who knows, their success in their department might have its attachment to the impact of cannabis smoking (Fertman 90). Moreover, others, who have escaped the anti-doping agency, have gone to become successful. This therefore would form a solid platform as to why college students may as well smoke cannabis and become successful individuals in their business environment. It is because marijuana is a performance enhancing substance for most successful athletes (Flowers 77). On most campuses, the athletic training rooms in U.S.A tags itself as ‘rumor central’ when it comes to whether athletes consider cannabis use as a booster to their performance. Charles Thompson, head athletic trainer at Princeton University admits that stories come and die about the college use of marijuana among the athletes. The truth of the matter is that this is the norm to so many of the college athletes for they attach athletic success to use of marijuana. In 2010, the college football season saw marijuana arrest affect the program at Florida, Notre Dame, and Oklahoma. The bigger picture, which ought to come up, is whether these athletes end up performing in their athletic competitions (Fertman 95). If the answer is yes, then as they say, the end justifies the means. It would be completely uncalled for, for an employer to sack his manager for having waterproof evidence that he smokes cannabis. The underlying concept before the action comes into force should be to counter check whether this manager has been performing or underperforming in his portfolio (Malone 90). Most definite answers, even if it was the lowest of the employees, the results would show that these smokers are outstanding performers in their disciplines. Therefore, if any, college student has had a chain of smoking habit in his college life, graduates successfully, and continues with the same behavior in the business world, and still chop it up with exponential results, then the college graduate proofs he can be successful while still smoking or taking alcohol in his areas of occupations (Trevouledes 88). In addition, most of the world-beaters in business have a history of smoking weed in their areas of success. To mention but a few, some like U.S.A President Barack Obama, reality talk show queen, Oprah Winfrey, and many others have reached a self actualization level that no other human capacity in history has made it happen (Flowers 70). They have even made it public that they smoke weed and others take alcohol yet they have never scampered in their business ideas. Ironically, they have led their teams into distinct levels of success one cannot imagine. Come to imagine that most of these open lovers of cannabis were once college students, most notably Obama’s success at the Harvard school of law (Gardner, John, Jewler, and Betsy 85). The assumption here is probably he took a bite of it. However, did this deter the dream and passion of success we see in Oprah Winfrey’s defiance of age to continue breaking records by transforming lives through her famous talk show? The option is that it has not done that much damage, in fact, what many would agree to is that marijuana use has given them post college immortal business ideas that leave many astonished. In the example of these open smokers, they just blew pothead stereotype up in smoke (Malone 77). The same may apply to college students, who take alcohol and cannabis for pleasure. In an event where the college graduate is unable to yield fruit in his area of jurisdiction, and proven research connects that to his persistent use of marijuana or alcohol, then the same college graduate has no privilege of smoking or taking alcohol in his area of occupation (Flowers 142). Though long standing findings of marijuana opponents’ points to the seen fact that marijuana and alcohol use drives one to long-term effects such as lack of motivation in one’s occupation, a sampling of successful users suggests that it bolsters their innovativeness and motivation on the other hand. Some of these successful post-graduate students are today the most influential people in the history of American disciplines like politics, Justice Corridors, Entertainment, and Entrepreneurship. According to some like, Maya Angelou, they admit into using marijuana in their college life, once or twice, but this has never disconnected them from their dreams (Gardner, John, Jewler, and Betsy 98). With this successful example, the main idea in this research is to dispel the myth that weed smokers are nothing but turn out later to be mere losers. Instead of all these stereotyped effects, the majority of these colleges, and post college graduates have renewed motivation, and highlighted the fact that, they are typically produced and oftentimes quite successful people in their areas of occupation. In conclusion, many of the American’s and globally successful individuals have smoked marijuana and taken beer, not only in their school days but also in their working areas. This proposition should not refute the fact that there are real damaging side effects of using marijuana (Flowers 120). Some college individuals have found themselves in the deteriorating path, while others have faced the sack due to marijuana or alcohol use in their jobs. That is a fact, but the reality that many as well have come out successfully should give a substantive rationale to allow marijuana and alcohol taking in areas of jurisdiction (Malone 78). Statistics also show that marijuana is the second most frequently used drug by college students. More than 46.9% have nodded into marijuana use of their college life, but the transition to working level for many is minimal. Just like being in life, there are things in college knowledge that one has to do that are not particularly pleasant, just like smoking and alcohol taking (Gardner, John, Jewler, and Betsy 122). It is part of achieving an academic degree and thus may come as a booster in what people do in their post college and still be successful. Work cited Fertman, Carl I. Student-athlete Success: Meeting the Challenges of College Life. Sudbury, Mass: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2009. Print Flowers, R B. College Crime: A Statistical Study of Offenses on American Campuses. Jefferson, N.C: McFarland & Co, 2009. Internet resource. Gardner, John N, A J. Jewler, and Betsy O. Barefoot. Your College Experience: Strategies for Success. Boston, MA: Thomson/Wadsworth, 2008. Print. Malone, Michael S. The Everything College Survival Book: From Social Life to Study Skills-All You Need to Fit Right in. Cincinnati: F+W Media, 2010. Internet resource. Trevouledes, Diana, and Ingrid Z. Grieger. Success and Sanity on the College Campus: A Guide for Parents. Lanham, [Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Education, 2012. Print. Read More