Comments (0) Cite this document
In all the societies, if a person violates the laws he or she is supposed to be punished. According to Kant, the death penalty is supposed to be administered to prevent future criminal behaviors. He argues that every person is supposed to follow the law regardless of the social status…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER99% of users find it useful
Read TextPreview


DEATH PENALTY FOR TERRORISTS Argument for: Terrorists should be punished to deter future criminal conduct
In all the societies, if a person violates the laws he or she is supposed to be punished. According to Kant, the death penalty is supposed to be administered to prevent future criminal behaviors. He argues that every person is supposed to follow the law regardless of the social status.
Acting to satisfy one’s self-interest is unacceptable
Kant argues that acting to satisfy one’s interest is not acceptable. It is immoral to kill someone to obtain something is not morally upright. If the government decides to kill someone because he or she killed someone else, the action is moral. Terrorists take away the lives of the people. Thus, the government is supposed to protect the lives of the citizens.
Benefits the society as a whole
Utilitarianism believes that capital punishment is morally acceptable, and it benefits the society as a whole. If an action brings happiness to the whole society, then it should be carried out. Utilitarianism also states that if capital punishment causes pain to one person or only a few people in the society, then the action is not immoral. Additionally, utilitarianism aims at society’s happiness and not individual happiness. If capital punishment will bring happiness to the society. Then it should be administered.
The law is supposed to be strictly adhered
Natural laws guide the individual’s behavior. The natural laws are those that are innate. They are the rights that are given to us at birth. The rights are based on principles such as customs, beliefs and expression. If a person commits a crime, the rights are supposed to be adhered. The laws of most of the states’ state that if a person kills, the death penalty is supposed to be administered. Terrorist causes the death of many people. Hence, the death penalty is supposed to be administered.
Argument against:
Punishment and crime are inconsistent with happiness
According to the utilitarian philosophy, laws are supposed to be used so as to maximize the happiness of the society. Punishment and crime, do not bring happiness to the members of the society. Utilitarians have the belief that a crime-free society does not exist. They state that death penalty has consequences for both the society and the offender.
Death penalty does not prevent crime
Additionally, the total good produced through punishment, it is supposed to exceed the total evil. Death penalty will not prevent the terrorists from committing acrime. When one is killed because of terrorists’ activities, it will not prevent the other terrorists from committing a crime.
Rehabilitation would do better
This is another of the utilitarian rationale for punishment. Rehabilitation aims at preventing future crime and giving the offenders ability to succeed within the confines of the law. Through rehabilitation, the offenders learn new ways to compete in the job market.
Life imprisonment is better than death penalty
According to Egoism, all the actions that a person decides to do has its motivation. The primary motivation for committing the criminal activities is self-interest. The terrorists carry out the terrorist activities out of self-interest. In Egoism, life incarceration is supposed to be an alternative to thedeath penalty. Egoism states that both the just and unjust commit crime for self-interest. Thus, death penalty cannot be a solution to eliminate crime especially the terrorists’ activities. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“DEATH PENALTY FOR TERRORISTS Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(DEATH PENALTY FOR TERRORISTS Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
“DEATH PENALTY FOR TERRORISTS Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document


Death Penalty

... Death Penalty Death penalty has been a controversial issue in the international community. Many nations have been disturbed and argued about the best way it can be handled. This has made generation of questions on how best the capital offenders can be punished in order to have justice for both the offenders and victims of the circumstances. The bill of rights supports the right of individuals to live and associate freely. On the other hand, the same legal provision is also used to condemn capital offenders to death sentence. The religious community questions the legality of the death sentences and at the same time urges citizens to follow the law. It is still ironical when they defend the law breakers. Many countries stress... to maintain a...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Death penalty

...?Death Penalty In a world characterized by all forms of crimes, law and justice are very important aspects in the society. There are different levelsof crimes. Some are civil while others are capital. Governments and religious organization dictate the course of justice to the offended and the punishment to the convicted in the society. There are various forms of justice and punishment applied by governments and religious groups. Different crimes require different punishments. Among such punishments is the death penalty. However, in also most all cases the power to prescribe a punishment rests with the courts of law that are arms of the government. Death...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Death penalty

...Jane Doe Introduction Death penalty is when a government takes the life of an individual as punishment for wrong doing.This form of punishment is the most extreme punishment that a government can use on its citizens. It has been used at different times in many societies in all parts of the world, though mainly as a last resort in a small number of cases. At the beginning of the 20th century, nearly all countries practiced some form of capital punishment, but it is no longer used in most countries (Stearman, 2007). The benefits and drawbacks of the death penalty are debated widely. Can it ever be justified? And if it can, under what circumstances should it be used? Does...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Death Penalty

...Module Death Penalty Is the death penalty moral? Does it curb crime? The issue of the death penalty raises many questions and the answer on its effects varies depending on the respondent. The crucial dilemma lies on the legality of the death penalty and its effectiveness in curbing crime. Death penalty is defined as the use of death to punish criminal law offenders. It has been applied as a form of punishment since the colonial era. Recent statistics on the crime rate indicate that the death penalty is ranked amongst the...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Death penalty

...number Why should the Death Penalty be abolished The Death penalty is one of the most controversial forms of punishment. Its roots in the context of corporal punishment has been criticized for its harshness and inhumanity; but it has also been lauded for its apparent effectiveness in deterring crime and brandishing corresponding punishment for severe and heinous crimes. On one side of the issue, the death penalty is based on the concept of an ‘eye for an eye,’ and that one should receive the corresponding punishment for one’s actions. On the other side of this issue, the death penalty is considered an...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

Death penalty terrorists who commit minor crimes, in New York Times dated February 21, 2001; One can argue about the effectiveness of the death penalty generally. But when it comes to terrorism, national security concerns should be paramount. The execution of terrorists, especially minor operatives, has effects that go beyond retribution or justice. The executions play right into the hands of our adversaries. We turn criminals into martyrs, invite retaliatory strikes and enhance the public relations and fund-raising strategies of our enemies (Stern, 2001) The above opinions should be taken seriously when we analyses the death penalty issue. It...
4 Pages(1000 words)Term Paper

Death Penalty

...? Death Penalty Death Penalty Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, has, in the past, been exercised by many jurisdictions (Gaie, 2012). However, these days, only 58 nations actively exercise it and 97 nations have done away with it. The rest, nearly 50 states, have not utilized the law for a decade. They, however, permit it in exceptional situations for instance during wartimes. It is an issue of active controversy in numerous states and countries, and positions can differ in a single cultural region or political ideology. In the European Union (EU) member countries, the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

USA Patriot Act 2001

...gone through several legal changes and the federal courts have ruled that many of the provisions in the Act are unconstitutional and affect the civil rights of people. Many bills were proposed to amend and make changes to the Act, a few of which were the Protecting the rights if Individuals Act, the Security and Freedom Ensured Act. However, none of these bills were passed. The USA Patriot Act was finally reauthorized by two bills, the Terrorism Prevention Reauthorization Act of 2005 and the USA PATRIOT Act Additional Reauthorizing Amendments Act of 2006. The Terrorism Prevention Reauthorization Act of 2005 created new provisions related to death penalty for terrorists, new measure...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Death penalty

...The Death Penalty. : Course: Date: The Death Penalty. The death penalty is an emotive issue which arouses passions on ethical, religious, political, economical and social fronts. Both the supporters and opponents of capital punishment have marshaled convincing arguments to support their respective stands. The debate continues, reflecting the social and political climate of the times. Advocates of the death penalty contend that it is the only means of serving justice and deterring further...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Death penalty

...Death Penalty: Is it Right or Wrong? Full Death penalty has always been an issue debated through the years, whether it is rightor wrong. There are different ideas about this argument and despite many discussions there are still a lot of matters that come from generation to generation, making it a never ending argument. The intensity of a crime is one of the vital things taken into consideration for the punishment given to a person and the philosophy of taking a tooth for a tooth and an eye for an eye is said to be a necessary step to take in implementing punishments. On the other hand, the question arises if such is humane to the educated law makers and so the debate goes...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic DEATH PENALTY FOR TERRORISTS for FREE!

Contact Us