The escalating incidences emanate from many factors that affect touch on the well-being of the people engaging in the vice. Terrorism has devastating effects that range from disrupted economic growth and…
Download file to see previous pages...
When adequately addressed, economic and democracy issues result into satisfied citizens leading to limited chances of terror groups arising. Improved democracy and economic development can assist most countries in the fight against terrorism.
Democratization is a vital strategy in counterterrorism. Democracy, when effectively adopted limits the chances of circumstances and conditions that favor the legitimization and spread of terrorism from taking place. It leads to the advancement of human freedom and democracy that are essential to ensuring the success of the war on terror-related activities. Democracy helps counter four factors that commonly contribute to the development of domestic terror groups (Gross, 2009, p26). Freedom gives more people the opportunity to participate in political processes together with increased civil liberties. It also leads to the upholding of the rule of law discouraging many people from becoming members of terror groups. When democracy is present in a country, the citizens believe in the systems of justice. It diverts their attention from seeking alternative strategies of airing their grievances, for instance, participating in terror activities. Democracy widens the scope of avenues available for people to pursue their grievances in a country. A democratic system protects the sovereignty and ensures maintenance of order in a state. Conflicts resolution occurs peacefully through the independent and fair justice systems. However, controversy arises in the case of transnational terrorism that occurs irrespective of democracy in a country. The fact, therefore, remains that democracy is only effective in curbing domestic terrorism because transnational terrorism arises from other factors.
In close relation to the effect of democracy on the ease of joining terror groups is the reduction of the number of
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The author states that the problem is in the way the counter-terrorism strategy is designed. It relies on three rules. First, Americans never make any deals with terrorists. Second, all terrorists are treated as criminals. Third, the US apply considerable political, economic, and military pressure on the states that are known to be supporting terrorism.
No nation is said to be immune from such threat. Even the stable, homogeneous society like Japan is vulnerable (Branscomb, 2004). For example, the religious sect Aum Shinrikyo made small quantities of several biological agents and successfully carried out an attack plan on the people in Tokyo subway.
National Strategy for Counter-terrorism
If it is part of a broader insurgent the terrorism, the counter insurgent doctrine may be partly based on the counter-terrorism, but economical, political and other measures that may tend to focus more on the security breach or insurgency than the actual terror act.
If the citizen was a member of a foreign terrorist group, in a foreign country, or working for a foreign government, they could be considered an unlawful enemy combatant. An example is Jose Padilla, a US citizen charged in Chicago with aiding terrorists in the construction of a 'dirty bomb'.
Apart from the differences between the demands of the two, it can be claimed that there are a few similarities between anti-terrorism and human rights demands that can stick both to a common aim. Both have political agenda with a solid public support 1and critics believe that both need media coverage, attention and popularity.
The author states that California is also the economic hub of America and also houses the biggest number of important buildings, international corporations and film industry. After 9/11, US Patriotic Act was amended and renamed ‘USA Patriot and Terrorism Prevention Reauthorization Act’. There were introduced surveillance and detention of people.
A special, top secret court, termed as the FISA was crafted to hear appeals for such justifications. Safeguards were placed in a position to make certain that investigators following criminal issues did not
global community, particularly due to terrorism’s individual as well as collective costs to human beings and systems of life around the world (UNCHR 2008, p.1). The individual costs of terrorism comprise of the real and direct impact on the rights of humans, particularly its
15 Pages(3750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Is democracy promotion/economic development an effective counter terrorism strategy for FREE!