Influence of Colonialism on Politics and Economics of Africa Nations - Essay Example

Influence of Colonialism on Politics and Economics of Africa Nations Introduction Colonization in Africa had long lasting effects still experienced in modern day Africa.  It is still a hot topic that the colonization has influenced African states development, and affects the rapid changes in the society, economy as well as structure of the government. There have been examples of internal displacement, ethnic violence, and other kinds of conflicts as a result of post-colonization in Africa. Africa is a huge continent that has 54 countries at the moment. And also, there are many nations that are showing great potential as a developing country since the decolonization from the Western powers. In assessing the progress of Africa nations in post- colonial era, it is important to factor in the adverse outcomes of the sudden transition from being under pressure to a free and independent country. The first Europeans to settle in Africa were Portuguese in 1446. Other Europeans came in Africa first as missionaries, then as colonizers. The British and German idea was for imperialism while the French had no problems with assimilation. The numerous natural resources made Africa attractive to most European nations. Presently, like most parts of the world, Africa has different people, cultures, languages and history partly because of colonialism (Hrituleac 2). Research Problem A lot of literature exists on the influence of colonization on countries. However, most political science and history research analyzes the implication of colonialism in a holistic manner. Ziltener and Kunzler observe that this analysis is not sufficient as different colonial methods were used in different colonies (305). Moreover, the debate of the political and economic influence of colonialism in Africa is still open with some school of thoughts arguing that colonialism has assisted Africa more than exploited it. The assistance in form of infrastructure, education, urbanization, new political and economic systems is often cited. This paper will attempt to weigh in on the debate by using secondary data to explore the influence of colonialism in Africa by observing three African countries with distinct colonial history. Research question: This study will look at the historical and current political and economic structures of three African countries (Algeria, Liberia and South Africa). Since Liberia was not colonized by Europeans, Algeria attained independence in the late 60s and South Africa attained independence in the 1990s, the study assumes that the trends in their political and economic structures are directly linked to the nature of colonization. In order to address the research problem the following research question was derived: How did colonization influence the political and economic structures in the African countries of Algeria, Liberia and South Africa? To answer this question, the following research objectives were formulated: To describe the historical and current political structures of the study countries To describe the historical and current economies of the study countries To assess the link between political and economies structures with colonialism in the study countries. Methods Colonialism as an intervening variable has huge diversity and variations. This is because colonialism style and experiences were different and therefore coding to get the influence of colonialism is a challenge (Ziltener and Kunzler 305). The methodology used is consistent with colonial discourse theorem where the relationship between colonial systems and structures are studied. It involved qualitative research in which two strategies were used to collect data. The first strategy was literature review where the information on colonialism was collected from various sources including journals, books and reports. The second stage involved collecting political and economic data for the three case studies. The nature of colonialism in the case studies is used to explain the political and economic status of the cases. All the information in this research paper are obtained from reliable sources hence they are valid; the information for literature review are obtained from screened sources. Furthermore, each of the concepts described is counterchecked from at least one more source. The data for the case study are obtained from only two sources, i.e., The World Bank and Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC). Literature review Theories of colonialism Sartre Theory of Colonialism and neo-colonialism The philosophies of Sartre on colonialism are informed by the events in colonial Algeria. Sartre identifies colonialists as people who do not mind about the liberty and equality of other individuals. He observes the irony as the French people cited liberty and freedom as important aspects in humanity. Colonialists use the best resources exploiting the natives and dominating them politically (Smith, 443). Ending colonialism is a moral obligation to which political action is sine qua no. This implies action is needed even if the action is revolution/violence. He also argued that colonialism encourages racism. Among his famous quotes on colonialism was that, ‘…we are viewing the terrible agony of colonialism’ (Smith 429). The quote implied that the working class French working class citizens were seeing the effects of colonialism in Africa but were doing nothing about it. Sartre ideals on colonialism were Marxist. He also warned of neo-colonialism where the former colonized people use the same oppressive systems of the colonialists for the benefit of few individuals. Through neo-colonialism, the western powers exert indirect maximum control of their former colonies through the channels of culture, politics and above all economies (Alemazung 69; Child and Williams 5). Colonial discourse theory is explained by Tiffin and Alan which analyze the roles played by colonialists rather than relying on texts (21). It is a system of statements that can be made from studying colonial powers and systems, and the relationship between the two. Postcolonial theory Unlike colonial and neo-colonial philosophies, a lot of literature has been written on postcolonial theories. According to Child and Williams, postcolonial theory is best explained by the globalization of capitalism, which is influenced by contemporary critical theories of feminism, Marxism, post-structuralism and postmodernism (21). According to Gandhi, the theory prioritizes itself in attempting to scavenge the colonial past to describe an implacable enmity between native and invader (11). He also notes that colonialism and neocolonialism did not take into account the psychological resistance to the colonizers civilization mission, and postcolonial theory ought to consider it (18). Postcolonial is a period after decolonization. Decolonization refers to the process where the colonial power cedes dominance and power to indigenous members of the society. History of colonialism According to Ziltener and Kunzler, colonialism is a temporary domination of people politically to exploit them economically (291). In 1885, during the scramble for Africa, European powers imposed formal territorial boundaries in Africa without consideration of ethnicity (Blanton 473) or extant trade (Ndulu and Chakraborti 102). The primary reason for Europeans coming to Africa in the late 19th Century was to expand their territories and explore areas to obtain resources for their mother countries. African resistance was a key narrative in most of colonial governments (Cooper, 1520). While colonial governments are known to be oppressive and exploitative, Kholi analyzes on the benefits of colonialism to countries. He uses the example of Japan colonizing South Korea from 1905-1945 causing it to evolve to a great developmental path. The colonialism transformed South Korea from authoritarian leadership to a democracy with an efficient police from and a functioning civil society (1274). Hovarth points out the definition of colonialism. He states that the term is generally used interchangeably with imperialism. He notes that while in colonialism a huge number of settlers migrate and live permanently in a country, in imperialism the foreign power has control of the country except that not many people come to settle in the country. He gives example of Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and Latin America as being colonized, and most of Africa and Asia as being imperialized (47). This research, like most academic papers, recognizes both imperialism and colonization as colonization. Colonialism in the study countries The French conquered Algeria in the period of 1830 to 1847. The location of Algeria as a uniting hub for Europe, Middle East and Africa had made Algeria to be occupied by various colonialists before including Romans, Arabs and Turkish. According to Blanch, the French were established in Algeria by early 20th century with their citizens numbering 300,000 in the country (540), and were trying to impose their cultures of Algerians with minimal success compared to British colonies that were more organized (551). The Algerian Civil war between 1954 and 1962 that killed over one million Algerians and French led to the independence of Algeria in July 3, 1962 (Stora, 109). At the start of the nineteenth century, the Americans realized that slavery was not viable. Additionally, the White Americans were increasingly concerned about the increase of Black population in their midst. The American Colonization Society was formed with the aim of emancipating all the Blacks to Liberia. However because of high mortality of the settlers in Liberia, the program stalled. Hence Americans colonized Liberia from 1820-1843 (Shick 12-19). While Liberia was not colonized by Europeans, descendants of the freed slaves known as Americo-Liberians, who were approximately 3% of the population, had the political and economic control of Liberia until a coup in 1980. The Dutch colonized South Africa in 1652 and became Afrikaners, but in 1779; the British took over Afrikaners lands and made South Africa a British colony, but gave control back partly Afrikaners in 1910 (Meskell and Weiss 88-93). The Afrikaners through their dominant National Party in South Africa set up the apartheid system that created visible stratification among people the Whites and Blacks (Faulkner and Loewald, 2). In essence, both Liberia and South Africa were colonized by settlers. African politics Ekah define politics as actions of an individual that are in the public realm. Activities, such as religion and household issues are not political because they are in the private realm (92). The politics of colonialists took different forms depending on the existing pre-colonial structures and conditions of the colony (Acemoglu et al. 7; Ziltener and Kunzler 297). For instance colonialists settled en mass in areas in which were favorable to them and developed efficient routes to extract resources in areas that were not favorable to them. Additionally, the style of ruling was different as Britain preferred indirect rule where they appointed local leaders while French preferred direct rule in most of their colonies. It was common for colonialists in Africa to have people from the same ethnicity in certain areas (Alemazung 66). For instance in Kenya, the British preferred Kamba ethnic community to be in the army, while in Togo administrative positions were dominated by Ewe tribe (Ziltener and Kunzler 298) Ekah notes that there are two public realms in modern day Africa; one is the primordial public that operates in the same way as public realm and two is the public realm associated with colonial administration and includes things such as military, civil service and so on (92). Acemoglu et al. argues Africa is poorer compared to rest to the world not because it has poor cultural and geographical factors, but because of poor political, social and economic institutions set up by the colonial governments (4). Brown reinforces this by claiming many problems in Africa are obtained from the legacy of colonialism (183). Fulgniti et al. questions the influence of colonial masters in Africa to the country’s political and economic stability. They observe that former Belgian colonies, such as Burundi, Congo and Rwanda have had numerous conflicts in the past, and so have Portuguese colonies, such as Angola and Mozambique. British and French had more colonies, and in as much as some of their former colonies are unstable, bigger proportions have a history of relative political and consequently economic stability (172-176). Politics in the study country According to Stora, the extant political structure in Algeria is a manifestation of how the nation was formed. The rule is authoritarian with strong military backing to the president (118). Algeria has a dysfunctional democracy as manifested by military coup that followed the 1991 legislative elections (Joffé 2). The politics of South Africa has been based on democracy, with peaceful elections being held every five years since 1994. Only one party, Africa National Congress, has led the country since end of apartheid (Lodge and Scheidegger 2). Liberia also has democratic structures in place, the democratic structures came up recently in 2006 after a 14 year civil war that ended in 2003 (2). African economies According to Faulkner and Loewald, economic growth is determined by the rate of increase in capital, labor and other factors of production and the efficiency of their use (1). Major economic impacts of colonialism are ‘the drain of wealth’, exploitation of natural resources, control of trade and improvement of infrastructure (Ziltener and Kunzler 299). Settle argues that Africa was advancing in trade before colonization, and claims that colonizers wanted maximum economic benefit for the lowest price. Cooper concurs by reporting that some of the greatest success stories of European economies arose from colonization of Africa. He mentions the examples of Gold Coast of Ivory Coast and Nigeria in the 1920s (1530). Plantations were the major element of the colonial economy in which residents were forcefully evicted on prime land and then hired under low wages to work in the plantations. The products of plantation were mainly processed and exported to the mother colonies (Ziltener and Kunzler 300) Economies of the study countries Stora claim that forty percent of Algerians were living below poverty line at independence mainly because of the eight year civil war (121). Algerian economy mainly depends on oil, but has a history of low foreign investments mainly because of violence that is perennial in the country. The unemployment rate was high at 30% in 2001 (Joffé 6). The Liberian GDP peaked in 1979, began to decline after the coup in 1980 and collapsed outright at the beginning of war in 1989 (Radelet 2). The economic growth accelerated with President Sirleaf Government in and was recorded at 7.8% in 2006. The economy of Liberia is dependent on agriculture, forestry and mining (4). The economy of South Africa is the largest and most diverse in Africa. In a decade before 1994, the economy of South Africa went down because countries opposing apartheid regime did not want to do business with the country. However, after gaining independence in 1994 and the consequent scrapping of apartheid saw increased economic growth (Faulkner and Loewald 4). However, poverty and unemployment are still rampant in South Africa. Most Blacks are poor with lesser education and inadequate access to healthcare as compared to the minority whites (Cook 15). The review of literature confirms that colonialists did take different strategies in gaining dominance over African countries. It also shows the Africa countries in study have different political and economic structures. A major gap identified in the literature is the observation that while many studies conclude that colonialism had social, political, cultural and economic influence on their colonies, few studies explicitly link particular influences to particular countries, backed with evidence. This is because most of the literature studies the influence of colonialism on continental or colonist levels. Description and Evaluation of Findings The economic and political data of the three case studies were collected from the World Bank and OEC (see table 1). The economic data of interest were gross domestic product per capita for five years, major economic exports, major importing and exporting countries. The political data of interest included political stability, government efficiency and rule of law. All the data of politics were on index of 0-100 with 0 implying poor and 100 excellent, and were compared between two years, 2006 & 2008, to have some insights of the trends. Table 1: Case study results ALGERIA       Economy    Source Major Exports Crude petroleum (45%), Petroleum Gas (37%)   OEC GDP per capita (2010-2014) US$ 5360   World Bank Export to Italy 15%, US 15%, Spain 12%   OEC Import from France 14%, China 11%, Italy 9.9%   OEC Politics 2006 2013   Political stability 15.8 12.8 World Bank Government effectiveness 35.6 31.5 World Bank Rule of law 30.14 29.3 World Bank LIBERIA       Economy     Major Exports Rubber (28%) Iron ore (20%)   OEC GDP US$ 454   World Bank Export to China 20%, Poland 15%, US 14 %   OEC Import from South Korea 54%, China 16%, Nigeria 8.1%   OEC Politics 2006 2013   Political stability 12.5 31.28 World Bank Government effectiveness 8.78 8.61 World Bank Rule of law 22.1 19.43 World Bank SOUTH AFRICA       Economy   OEC Major Exports Gold 18%, Platinum 7.8%   OEC GDP US$ 6617   World Bank Export to China 8.5%, US 8.1%, India 7.8%   OEC Import from China 13%, Germany7.4%, US 6.9%   OEC Politics 2006 2013   Political stability 47.12 44.8 World Bank Government effectiveness 69.27 66.51 World Bank Rule of law 59.33 57.82 World Bank Source (World Bank, OEC) Economies It is observed that the economies of the three countries are different. South Africa GDP per capita is higher as compared to the other countries. All the top two exports from the three countries are based on natural resources, which are not much processed. For Liberia and Algeria, the top two exports almost accounts for half of their exports. It is against expectations that the former colonialists are not major trading partners of the countries. Politics The score for all the countries is quite low for the political indices. A conspicuous trend is that all the indices for politics declined when compared between the two years. The exception is Liberia’s political stability index that increased between the two years. Political stability measures the likelihood of terrorism or violence, government effectiveness is an index estimating credibility of government and quality of service delivery while rule of law is to the extent to which laid out procedures are adhered to. Overall, South Africa fared better than Algeria which fared better than Liberia when all the indices are compared. Colonial influence on politics and economy Although France is the main exporter to Algeria, it was expected that former colonial powers would dominate more trade in their former colonies especially Algeria and South Africa. This is because they had created routes for exploiting resources from their colonies. Nevertheless, U.K is still the fourth importer and exporter to South Africa and France is the biggest exporter to Algeria. Liberia did not have a European colonial power in the 20th century. Africa is not processing most of its raw materials and it can be argued that not much has changed in the form of trading from the colonial times as Africa was still trading in similar materials. If the goal of the colonialist were to exploit natural resources for their mother land, then the objective of the colonialists are somehow still achieved up to date. The colonial influence on the politics of Africa is transformational. The major reason for this according to Ziltener and Kunzler is that many Africans countries did not have structured political systems covering a wide area (306). However, these structured political systems have been a source of conflict for many African countries. It has been claimed by many scholars that the arbitrary division of Africa in the Berlin conference is the major cause of conflicts in Africa (Alemazung 65; Ndulu and Chakraborti 102), though others claim conflicts the resultant political instability is a result of the style of rule of the colonialists who favored some ethnic communities thus causing feelings of bitterness to the non-favored (Blanton et al. 479). While the data presented in table 1 show those countries that were colonized (Algeria and South Africa) have a better economy, it can be argued that the better economy is a factor of resources and institutions present in the country. Furthermore modern economy is a Western construct and obviously countries that were colonized will have a certain advantage. However, the influence of colonialism on governance is conspicuous. Liberia has had a low government efficiency score compared to other countries; it can be argued that the inhabitants have no idea of modern governance. Kohli explains that the social patterns of the colonial power can influence the governance of the colony after decolonization (1285). Conclusion In conclusion, the colonialists influence on political structure in Africa is still present today. Political characteristics especially stability and governance directly affects the community. It appears that the politics and economies of African countries that were colonized for longer are faring better compared to those that were not colonized at all. This is mainly because, since modern economies and politics are Western constructs, the longer the colonialist stayed, the better they established the political and economic structures. In addition, the colonialists were better managers of conflicts in Africa because they are the ones who formed the borders. It is vital for African countries to work on their political structures; this is because the indices show trends of decline. Poor political structures can result to instability and poor governance, translating to poor economies and standards of living. Limitations This study only used economic and political data of a short period of time in the postcolonial era. For effective analysis on the influence of colonialism on the economy and politics of Africa, data from pre-colonial, colonial and colonial era should be compared. This research however compared data from the same source hence they were reliable and valid. Additionally, qualitative research methodology, such as the case study in this research paper implies that the findings cannot be generalized for other countries in Africa. Works Cited Acemoglu Daron, Johnson Simon, and Robinson James. The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation. Berckley: Political Science. 2000. Print Alemazung, Joy. “Post-Colonial Colonialism: An Analysis of International Factors and Actors Marring African Socio-Economic and Political Development”. The Journal of Pan African Studies, 3 .10 (2010): 40-50. Balch, Thomas. “French Colonization in North Africa.” The American Political Science Review, 3 .4 (1909): 539-551. Blanton, Robert, David T. Mason and Brian Athow. ‘Colonial Style and Post Colonial Ethnic Conflict in Africa,’ Journal of Peace Research, 38. 4 (2001): 473-491. Brown, Stephen. “Foreign Aid and Democracy Promotion: Lessons from Africa,” The European Journal of Development Research, 17. 2. (2005): 179–198. Print Child, Peter and Williams, Patrick. An Introduction to Post colonial Theory. Prentice Hall (n.d.).Web. April 6 2015 Cook Nicolas. South Africa: Politics, Economy, and U.S. Relations. December 19, 2013. Congressional Research Service. Print Cooper, Frederick. "Conflict and connection: rethinking colonial African history."The American Historical Review (1994): 1516-1545. Ekeh, Peter P. "Colonialism and the two publics in Africa: A theoretical statement." Comparative studies in society and history 17.1 (1975): 91-112. Faulkner David and Loewald Christopher. Policy Change and Economic Growth: A Case Study of South Africa. Policy Paper Number 14. (n.d)Print Fulginiti, Lilyan E., Richard K. Perrin, and Bingxin Yu. "Institutions and agricultural productivity in Sub‐Saharan Africa." Agricultural Economics 31.2‐3 (2004): 169-180. Gandhi, Leela. Postcolonial theory: A critical introduction. Columbia University Press, (1998). Print Horvath, Ronald J. "A definition of colonialism." Current anthropology (1972): 45-57. Print Hrituleac Alexandra. The Effects of Colonialism on African Economic Development A comparative analysis between Ethiopia, Senegal and Uganda. Msc Thesis. Aarhus University. (2011). Print Joffé George. “The Role of Violence within the Algerian Economy”. Journal of North African Studies: 7:1 (2002): 1-20. Print Kholi, Atul. Where Do High Growth Political Economies Come From? The Japanese Lineage of Korea’s “Developmental State”. World Development, 22. 9 (1994):1269-l293. Lodge, Tom and Scheidegger Ursula. Political Parties and Democratic Governance in South Africa. EISA Research Report No 25 (2006). Print Meskell Lynn and Weiss Lindslay. “Coetzee on South Africa’s Past: Remembering in the Time of Forgetting”. American Anthropologist, 108, 1 (2006): 88–99. Ndulu, B. J., and Lopamudra Chakraborti. Challenges of African Growth: Opportunities, Constraints, and Strategic Directions. Washington D.C.: World Bank, 2007. Print. OEC. Country Profiles. Observatory of Economic Complexity. 2015. Web. April 6 2015 Radelet Steven . Reviving Economic Growth in Liberia. Center for Global Development Settles, Joshua Dwayne, "The Impact of Colonialism on African Economic Development" (1996). University of Tennessee Honors Thesis Projects. Print. Shick, Tom W. "A quantitative analysis of Liberian colonization from 1820 to 1843 with special reference to mortality." Master Thesis. University of Wincostin (1970) Smith, Tony. Idealism and Peoples War. Political Theory Vol. 1, No. 4 (Nov., 1973), pp. 426-449 Stora, Benjamin. Algeria, 1830-2000: A short history. Cornell University Press, 2001. Tiffin, Chris, and Alan Lawson, eds. De-scribing Empire: post-colonialism and textuality. Taylor & Francis, 1994. World Bank. Data Indicators. The world Bank. 2015. Web. April 6 2015 Read More