Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Go to advanced search...

Judiciary - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
It is sometimes considered the opposite of judicial restraint. Legal activism definition is a contentious issue in the United States of…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.8% of users find it useful
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Judiciary"

Judiciary assignment al affiliation) Describe judicial activism and judicial restraint Judicial activism is a legal ruling that is assumed to be based on political or personal consideration rather than on the existing act or law. It is sometimes considered the opposite of judicial restraint. Legal activism definition is a contentious issue in the United States of America, and its questions are often related to statutory construction, constitutional interpretation and separation of powers. Judicial restraint is a judicial interpretation theory that encourages judges to limit the exercise of their power. It states that judges should vacillate to strike down laws unless they are apparently unconstitutional, though what is well thought-out as unconstitutional is a matter of debate. Judicial restraint is the antonym of judicial activism (Ringhand & Collins, 2010).
Role played by (judicial restraint versus judicial activism) debate during the Senate confirmation of Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Sonia Sotomayor?
The discussion between judiciary restraint and judicial activism started in the early days of the United States of America and has proceeded to the present. A number of renowned Supreme Court justices such as John Marshall have supported the judicial activism view, the belief that it’s the role of the judges to chart new constitutional grounds as well as make bold policy decisions. Supporters of legal activists are to judicial restraint that supports that the judiciary should leave the policy formulation and decisions making process to the executive and legislative branches (Ringhand & Collins, 2010).
For decades, Republican Party leaders have decried judicial activism and championed for judicial restraint. Republican politicians have associated judicial restraint with a commitment to judicial deference, stating that judges who support judicial activism disrespect the will of many people. The debate has continued to warrant close inspection as a result of the deployment of judicial activism by Republic politicians during the Supreme Court confirmation of Judge Sonia Sotomayor as well as in the 2008 presidential elections. The senators were utterly aghast that Sonia’s experience and background might affect her decisions and that she may be an activist. The Sotomayors emphasized that justices make no laws and policies but merely apply those laws that are in existence (Davis, 2009). It is uncontroversial to indicate that only chief Justice Scalia and Justice Roberts Alito and Thomas belong to the number of judges who are in the political circles of Republican. Justice Alito and Roberts were nominated by Bush and were considered Republican favorites. The two were however not democrat’s favorites, and President Obama was not ready to vote for the confirmation of Chief Justice Roberts.
It turns out that the decision-making process or aspect of the Supreme Court is the extent to which judges can be grouped into some divisive block, just as revealed by the judicial activism versus judicial restraint. It is impossible to discern just from voting behavior whether a vote in support of the government signifies pure substantive agreement or just diference logic. Let’s assume that voting for the government indicates respect. The assumption can be since; Chief Justice Scalia, Robert, Alito, and Thomas are still not characterized accurately as practitioners of judicial deference (Davis, 2009). The four conservative and the four liberal justices are into opinions and may vote precisely the way liberal Democrats and conservative Republican will do in congress and senate. Their confirmation was also influenced politically. It is true that judicial activism versus judicial restraint played a significant role in the approval of these judges.
Davis, A. W. (2009). The Richness of Experience, Empathy, and the Role of a Judge: The Senate Confirmation Hearings for Judge Sonia Sotomayor. U. Balt. LF, 40, 1-229.
Ringhand, L. A., & Collins Jr, P. M. (2010). May it please the senate: An empirical analysis of the senate judiciary committee hearings of Supreme Court nominees, 1939-2009. Am. UL Rev., 60, 589. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Judiciary Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Judiciary Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
“Judiciary Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document


Chinese Judiciary Achievements

...independent judiciary. This has been enhanced through enormous re-education and community attitude changes are encouraged. Achievements Chinese judiciary in the past thirty years has been successful in its quest for formalization and institutionalization. The areas include but not limited to; taking strides towards regulating acts of administrative laws. The important roles played by administrative legislation toward effective legal regulation of government legislative practices are crucial for any legal system. Legislative law of the people’s republic of china for instance, has ensured a basic legal framework for managing acts of administrative legislation (China's judicial system and its reform,...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay


... by any consideration except morals B. Discussion The judiciary performs its functions with the utmost fairness and equality; how judges must implement or interpret the law without any influence or pressure from anybody, so that citizens will have faith and trust in their justice system, as their supreme protector against oppression by powerful individuals or influential pressure groups. However, it is also faced with a number of problems or issues it must address so it can carry out its mandate adequately. 1. Judicial ethics – members of the judiciary are brought to a higher standard than other people, they being expected to uphold the law at all times so people will also respect the law. The foundation of law is based on the validity...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay


... at the same time, they happen to be perpetrators or participants in the cases of injustice (Dignan, 2004). This has happened according to various incidents, where the professionals either compromise their integrity against the justice system as a result of security threats to their lives or deliberate compromise because corrupt deals. PART I Professionals working in the judiciary such as judges, court prosecutors, attorneys and friends of the courts are under obligations to ensure that they execute justice in every case through implementation, defense and upholding of the law in full view of ethical standards. This implies that they should be the ambassadors of transparency rather than being the perpetrators or the promoters of injustices...
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper

Role of the judiciary

...? Constitutional Changes that have occurred in the United s with regard to Foreign Affairs Constitutional Changes that have occurred in the United States with regards to Foreign Affairs Introduction The American foreign policy regulations are basically made up of what is stipulated by constitutional law. Foreign policy has to do with subjects concerning American diplomacy, military interventions in other nations, international partnerships, and how it conducts its economic power. It also has to do with America’s treaties with other nations and its selection of American ambassadors to other nations. Thesis Statement: The American constitution stipulates that the main function of the nation’s foreign policy is to protect... Constitutional...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Judiciary Assignment

... Texas Judiciary Assignment Assignment Part This case entails of some community members who had a union that lasted for three days at the Del Lago Golf Resort located near the Lake Conroe. During the first night, the security officer forced a drunken patron from the bar and locked it earlier because of the disturbing situation. On the second night, the community members met at the resort bar to celebrate a wedding, it was during the period that tension among the communities developed. This entailed of incidents that developed tension and verbal exchanges among the individuals in the party, however, the security officer did not force anyone outside the bar. However, at around midnight, turmoil broke out for a couple of minutes and literally...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay


... The Supreme Court Washington Appeal Court Cases on Contraception Rule in the Affordable Health Care Act The Supreme Courtis currently hearing the cases on contraception that the Obama healthcare program requires employers to finance insurance cover for contraceptives. Two corporations who argued that their businesses are run on religious principles brought the case before the court (Liptak). Hobby Lobby, one of the challengers is a chain stores owned by a religious family. The other challenger is Conestoga Wood Specialties, a company that makes wooden cabinets and is owned by Mennonite family (Liptak). The court case is represented by Paul D. Clement who argue the case on behalf of the companies and solicitor general, Verrrille... The...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Texas Judiciary Assignment

...Texas Judiciary Assignment Facts The case involves an individual, Bradley Smith, and Del Lago partners. The plaintiff suffered injuries as a resultof the fight that broke out at a bar owned by the defendant. The plaintiff argues that the defendant did nothing to ensure his safety at the bar since he was not the party to the fight that broke at the bar. Mr. Smith had been invited to a party at the bar and sustained injuries after an altercation ensued at the bar. In his argument, the plaintiff argued that the bar breached its duty to care under the premise-liability claim. He argued that the bar could have done more to ensure that the persons not involved in the fight were not injured. Decision Smith won the case on a 6-3 decision...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment

Chinese judiciary independence

...then gets a retrial or transfer to the higher court to review. The Supreme Peoples Court is the highest judicial organ. After it makes judicial decisions, people cannot apply counter appeal. Disapproval Arrest rate, Disapproval Prosecution Rate, and the quantity of Counter-appeal earlier mentioned as the three representative and important data at the beginning, are all respectively produced from the above three judgment procedures. If the value of the data is large, that means the level of judiciary independence is high. If they are small, that means the level of judiciary independence is low. I will compare the three data sets from different periods and areas to draw a conclusion on whether the Chinese judiciary has had any...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

US Executive/Judiciary

... crisis crippled the economy leave people without a job while had to do with reduced income. Therefore, increasing the minimum wage will go a long way to bringing back the confidence of the people to spend and help the country out of the crisis. I support this executive order because families need a decent living standard where they can afford the basic needs as well as others non-basic needs. Moreover, it has been found that when families have a variety of choices to choose from because of increased wages the life expectancy increases as well. Judiciary Capital punishment (Hall v. Florida) The case for Hall has dragged in the court since 1978 when he was sentenced to death for killing Karol Hurst. Since that sentence, Hull sought appeal...
2 Pages(500 words)Coursework


...Over the period of time American Judiciary is said to have transformed itself into foray of politics and has been on the path of what is called judicial activism. The original ideas defined in Federalist 78 clearly suggests that judiciary will be the weakest of the three institutions and it will neither have will nor force but it will merely exercise its judgment. However, over the period of time, there has been deliberate and slow blurring of the boundaries of all the institutions of the State. First and foremost one of the key and significant structural change has been the matters which are relatively undecided in the constitution. Due to relative lack of US Constitution to address certain issues, judiciary became important... the period...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Judiciary for FREE!

Contact Us