Nobody downloaded yet

American Policy, Judicial Activism and Restraint - Assignment Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The reporter states that Judicial activism and restraint are both opposite approaches to constitutional and legal interpretation applied as the grounds for decision-making in a court case. As a criticism, Judicial activism might be rooted in the political bias of the individual applying the label and might or might not, in reality, have a foundation…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.1% of users find it useful
American Policy, Judicial Activism and Restraint
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "American Policy, Judicial Activism and Restraint"

Download file to see previous pages In giving its ruling, the conservative group of the Roberts Court improved the cause of "corporate personhood" through giving large corporations the capacity to drown out the voices of the electorate by the production and circulating of quasi-media messages promoting or demeaning certain political candidates. In giving corporations this power, the Court opened the door to making them the most powerful purveyors of public opinion, devoid of requiring accountability or truthfulness (Manje 102). This is a power that should not be granted to corporations, thus I close this question is support of judicial restraint powers.
In Furman v. Georgia, the justices considered the death penalty as a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment because these death sentences were cruel and unusual in the same manner that being struck by lightning is unusual and very cruel (Griffins 304). They argued the fact that people charged with rape are simply convicted, but those charged with petty crime want to be executed. I feel that the death penalty is a deterrent to crime so long as it is imposed on the necessary crimes that deserve to be punished with the death penalty. For instance, rapists, people who are charged with more than three counts of any crime. This will work as a very good example of deterring crime rates (Griffins 305). What would make one form of capital punishment cruel and unusual is the virtual belief that genuinely innocent individuals will be executed and that there is no likely way of repaying them for this miscarriage of justice? What constitutes cruel and unusual punishment, for instance, is the agony the innocent friends and family of criminals have to also undergo during the execution. However, the judges took into consideration the message they were sending to likely culprits in order to deter crime. (Griffins 304)
Haidt’s research gives me greater insight into why people feel differently than I do about politics and government due to the simple fact that their always opposing views about politics that is why there are liberalism and conservatism. ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“American Policy, Judicial Activism and Restraint Assignment”, n.d.)
American Policy, Judicial Activism and Restraint Assignment. Retrieved from
(American Policy, Judicial Activism and Restraint Assignment)
American Policy, Judicial Activism and Restraint Assignment.
“American Policy, Judicial Activism and Restraint Assignment”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF American Policy, Judicial Activism and Restraint


...of Community law thereby removing the barrier of restricted jurisdiction and is able to develop its authority and role. The main aim of this research essay will be analysing in detail the activist strategy of the ECJ which appears to have initiated some courageous and bold efforts to establish a constitutional cornerstone for the EU2. “What is Judicial Activism?” Judicial activism connotes to the keenness of the courts to establish public policy if a State, and its political institutions is reluctant to do the same or may not in a position to execute the same. In real parlance, it can be called as the shifting of judicial decision making...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Attitudes to smoking changed since the smoking ban

8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Judicial Restraint and Judicial Activism

...Judicial Activism Judicial activism and judicial restraint are two terms which are bandied about on both sides of the spectrum. Conservatives decry judicial activism. They state that judges should not make law, only interpret the law. However, this is hypocrisy, because conservatives do not seem to mind activism when it comes to issues that they believe in. For instance, in Bush v. Gore, 531 US 98 (2000), which is the ultimate case of judicial activism, conservatives did not decry this case as being a case of judicial...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Judicial activism

...ROPER V. SIMMONS Debbie Whitmore Academia-Research, Inc. June 23, 2005 Judicial activism and restraint are points of controversy for politicians, general public and the Supreme Court itself. Judicial activism refers to the court's willingness to become involved in major issues and the extent that it makes decisions based on constitutional grounds. Judicial restraint is when the Court takes the stand that law making is to be left to the legislators and it opposes the nullification of a law only when the Constitution is unquestionably violated. It has been said that 'throughout its history,...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

American Judicial Structure

...Federalism and the American Judicial Structure: The Issue of Harmony This essay will examine the dual court structure that exists in the United States of America. The dualism refers to the separation of judicial systems into federal courts and state courts. The results can, at times, be overwhelming, given the fact that there is a federal judicial system and fifty state judicial systems in addition to a judicial system reserved to the District of Columbia. There are specific rules and limitations which attempt to harmonize these separate court structures, and these rules and regulations are most firmly rooted in the notions of geographical power, subject matter power, and hierarchal roles (Neubauer, 2005: 52-53). In order... , 2005:...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay


...-Cruz, 2002). Art activism moves people through what they see. It stirs up something inside the viewer to do something. It was a medium that has been used by many to change the course of history. Art activism can be expressed in many ways. The examples are many; the Harlem Renaissance in 1919-1929, it was an early depiction of an African-American activist art. There was Angelina Grimke’s play “Rachel”, the stage was used to be heard clearly that everyone is equal, regardless of color and race. In 1917 Lenin used the colorful festivals to advance his agenda in Russia. These are just few examples of the power of Activist art (Cohen-Cruz, 2002). Artistic skills can be used to attract the...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Judicial Activism

...than application of the constitution has an immense contribution. The Supreme Court was put to spotlight in 2012 on the issue of use of race in university admissions.This was prompted by the Fisher vs. University of Texas case. The University of Texas has a program that regulates the admission of freshmen on the basis of race. The review by the Supreme Court is in progress. The court decision can be prejudged. This is so because of the underlying need to interpret diversity in learning institutions. This is contrary to the view that no case is prejudged. References Craig, B. H., & OBrien, D. M. (1993). Abortion and American politics. Chatham, N.J: Chatham House. Forte, D. F. (1972). The Supreme Court in...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Judicial restraint and judicial activism

...Judicial Restraint and Judicial Activism The doctrine of judicial activism is based on the belief that the federal judiciary is supposed to take an active function by utilizing its powers to examine the activities of the state legislatures, administrative agencies, and the Congress (this is in the case where the aforementioned government bodies go beyond their authority). The Supreme Court acted in an activist manner in the period between 1953 and 1969, and this is in an era when Chief Justice Earl Warren headed the Court. The Warren Court instigated the civil rights onward by suggesting that the laws allowing racial segregation were in violation of the equal protection clause (Bardes, Schmidt, and Shelley 459). On the other hand... , the...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Difference between Judicial activism and Judicial restraint

...from referring to their own philosophies when making decisions. Another difference between the practices is the fact that there is a shift in policymaking. This is because judges normally assume the role of independent policy makers in the case of judicial activism. Implying that they become independent trustees of the constitution on behalf of the community. This sharply contrasts judicial restraint, which prohibits the judges from being policy makers, as they are only allowed to make their decisions hinged on what is entrenched in both the constitution and the laws of the land. In Judicial...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Judicial Activism the realities of the time. We evolve and learn along the way and correspondingly, the Constitution must also adapt. Chief Justice Earl Warren explained in 1954 “the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society” (Perry, 2004 pg. 6) and correspondingly, this reality should compel us to interpret the law in a more appropriate way that responds to the standards of decency of the time. The law must not drag us back into the Middle Age. It should instead serve as a beacon that would usher us towards a just, humane and progressive society in the future that is why I am inclined towards judicial activism in interpreting the Constitution. Borrowing the words of Brennan, we...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Assignment on topic American Policy, Judicial Activism and Restraint for FREE!

Contact Us