Download file to see previous pages...
Lack of readiness for the war also contributed to the defeat. The Palestine neighboring allies were not willing to enjoin them in the war against the Israelis. It implies that the nation had to fight with a giant of military prowess, Israel, independently. Mufti Hajj Amin, the head of the Arab higher committee failed to unite all the Palestinians.
The unity of Palestine was needed to create a formidable force against their adversary, the Israelites. The head of the Supreme Commission of the Arab League never had the support of the leaders of Palestine3. Consequently, the Palestinians were bound to loss in the war. Amin was also isolated from vital discussions on the welfare of Palestine. The isolation of Palestine by the neighboring countries was a bad gesture. In this regard, the Palestinian nation had an opportunity to establish its identity. The American arms embargo on Palestine also contributed to the defeat of Palestine in the war. The military was ill-trained for the war4. The lack of efficient leadership also led to the coordination and adequate training for the Palestinian army. In this regard, Palestinians were only using obsolete artillery while Israelis were using modern, sophisticated weapons of war hence their win5. However, the failure of the neighboring allies of Palestine to support the Palestinians in the war culminated inflow of many refugees to the neighboring states. The countries faced socioeconomic challenges, which were never anticipated. The neighboring states were focused on the acquisition of more land and were never worried about the situation in Palestine until they started receiving large numbers of Palestine refugees, which constrained the budget of the nations. It owes to the fact that the nations had to make reserves to cater for the
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The Arab-Israel war was the first in a sequence of wars fought between the Jewish state and the Arab states since 1947. Avi (1998) observes that the Israelites refer to it as the war of independence. Avi further states that on November 29 1947, immediately after the United Nations announced its approval of a partition plan to resolve the Jewish-Arab conflicts, an uproar of violence escalated in the Middle East.
The present state constitutes all the land from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean ocean, having Lebanon in the north, Egypt in the south, and Jordan in the East (Shlaim, 50-60). There was no conflict between Jews and Arabs for centuries. During 19th century the land of Palestine was dwelt in by the people belonging to different culture and civilization, approximately 86 percent Muslim, 10 percent Christian, and 4 percent Jewish who were living in peace and maintaining friendly relations with each other.
The tendency and frequency with which war erupts in the region has been implicitly, and unfairly, associated in the mind of the public that the largely Muslim population is warlike and aggressive. Looking far into the roots of the largely nomadic tribes that in ancient times travelled these desserts, there is no indication of this
The Israelis were long exiled as a punishment from God according to the Scriptures but little by little they rose to power discretely claiming the lands they once used to reside through undeniable means. The small community of Jews who were patriotic in their mission combined to form Jewish nationalism which came to be known as Zionism.
The conflict is land based issue where the Arabs are of the idea that the land is their belonging and the Jewish community recognizes it as Israel and believes that it is their land. During the period of 135 AD, Jews were pushed out of their land located in the region of Palestine (Rea 4).
It is important to realize that the conflict between the Arabs and Jews belonging to two nations in the region has incorporated various international issues and various international organizations and nations have involved in the resolution of the issue. "The Arab-Israeli conflict is one of the most stubborn problems of the post-war era.
As such, the Palestinian Intifada may be defined as a social-political movement engaged in contentious politics for the purpose of bringing the Israeli occupation to an end. Given that the definitions of both intifada stages coincide, it may very well be assumed that the root causes and objects of both are similar.
As the author of the text puts it, it is saddening the Palestinians had to suffer an unforeseen fate after abandonment by the Jews and Arabs altogether following the departure of the British. The author also adds that the Arabs and Palestinians were ill prepared to face the newly born Israeli state and the Israeli made preemptive plans to occupy and control areas.
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Partition: The First Arab-Israeli War and the Palestinian Refugee Problem for FREE!