Sampling assignment - Essay Example

Sample Technique Part Comparing Sampling Techniques First sample Weed Patch school is equally large as compared to any population for the purpose of research. The population of 100 students is a mere representation in the sampling technique of the general population of the school.The drawing of three samples consisting of 20 students each of the sample population stated is carried out in unbiased manner and randomly chosen without any prejudice for the purpose of accuracy of the information we want to derive.

The selection of the students for each sample was done on the basis of random selection. The student were hand-picked to constitute a team of 20 students without condition or any other consideration (be it a student of any level, of any particular gender or age).The list of the first sample is:Student Days ID Absent 1 0 2 1 3 3 4 1 5 1 6 4 7 13 8 2 9 5 10 1 11 2 12 1 13 3 14 1 15 1 16 4 17 3 18 11 19 3 20 8 The comparison of the average calculated from the first sample which is 3.

4 with the population average which is 5.85 show a deviation of -2.45. The result of the average of the sample in comparison with the population is showing a relative large deviation since the first sample is just a mere representation of the whole population constituting 20% of the whole population in general. Another aspect of the big deviation is the existence of extreme values within the first sample for instance while student ID no. 1 has zero days for being absent, the student ID no. 7 has 13 days of absenteeism.

The second sampleThe second sample of this sampling technique is categorically picked on the basis of gender. The technique seeks to investigate the difference created as a result of the school attendance among the boy-child vis a vis the girl-child. This second sample particularly check the absenteeism rate across the whole school for the girl-child gender.The list of the 20 students randomly picked from the whole population of the 100 students are as stated in correspondence with their ID numbers and the number of days a student has been absent from school over the period.

Student Days ID Absent 81 4 82 5 83 2 84 11 85 9 86 9 87 9 88 6 89 10 90 3 91 0 92 7 93 8 94 4 95 6 96 10 97 3 98 4 99 3100 8The statistical comparison of the population average and the second sample gives (6.05-5.85 =0.2).The positive deviation felt in the second sample as compared to the population average is as a result of reduction in sample space from 100 to 20 students for the sampling purposes.

The average rate of absenteeism among the girls is slightly higher than the average population average, showing absenteeism is higher among girl-child in school.The Third Sample The third sample of this sampling technique entails the 20 boys among the 100 students population. This sample randomly picks at student from any grade, any age as long as he is a boy-child for this sampling purpose. Their ID numbers are recorded alongside their respective number of days one has been absent from school as follows:Student Days ID Absent 21 5 22 1 23 15 24 10 25 11 26 3 27 4 28 3 29 6 30 9 31 14 32 2 33 4 34 4 35 1 36 2 37 5 38 6 39 16 40 5 The statistical comparison of the third sample’s average with the population’s average gives (6.3 – 5.85 = 0.45).The average rate of absenteeism among the boys in the school is slightly above the average rate of absenteeism in the general population of the school.

The dispersion of several figures of the absenteeism among the boys within this sample becomes the basis on which the difference in averages is pegged with respect to the smaller sample size.Convenience samplingThis type of sampling is based on the judgement of the researcher on a non-probability technique. The basis on which the researcher lays the unit he selects for inclusion into the sample size should be easier to access.Advantages Convenience sampling is very easy to undertake since there are no strict rules governing the sample collection.

The informal access of population list makes convenience sampling the best for collection of information that would have been possible to get while using other techniques like probability techniques.Convenience sampling is less costly and minimal time consuming.DisadvantagesConvenience sampling suffers from biases as a result of a number of biases.Being that the sampling frame is unknown, and there is no random choosing of the sample, the inherent bias in the convenience sampling shows that it is unlikely to have are presentative sample of the whole population.

Simple Random Sample This technique puts every member of the population under study has equal chance of being selected. The whole process of the simple random sampling is carried in a single step with every item selected independently of the other various members of the population.AdvantagesThere is ease of assembling the sample. It is a fair way of selection since every member has equal chance of being selected.It has a fair level of being a representative of the general population with luck as the only compromising factor.

DisadvantageThe simple random sampling requires a whole list of all the population members. This whole list are not always available for large populations.Systematic Sample The technique involves a researcher first picking the first subject or item from the population. Then, the selection of the nth subject from the population is done.Advantages1. The systematic random sampling is having high level of simplicity.2. It has an assurance of the population to be evenly sampled unlike the simple random sampling where only a clustered selection of subjects is sampled.

Disadvantages1. A number of the lists are not readily available to the public domain and purchasing them would be expensive. 2. The problem of having access to the list is at times a challenge, though the list may be readily available, i.e. protected privacy policies.Part 2: Exploring Sampling ErrorSample A1Student Days ID Absent 1 0 41 5 81 42 1 42 9 82 513 3 53 3 93 814 1 54 4 94 415 1 55 4 95 616 4 19 322 1 62 923 15The average of the sample A1 has a deviation of 5.0-5.85= -.

85Sample A2Student Days ID Absent 63 1524 10 64 522 1 62 934 4 74 1235 1 75 536 2 76 637 5 77 043 2 83 24 1 44 4 84 115 187 9The average of the sample A2 has a deviation 4.8- 5.85= -1.05Sample A3Student Days ID Absent 45 747 4 87 98 2 48 0 11 2 51 5 91 06 4 46 5 86 97 13 47 4 87 98 2 48 0 88 69 5 49 6 89 10The average of the sample A3 has a deviation of 5.1 – 5.85 = -0.

75Sample A4Student Days ID Absent 10 1 50 15 90 317 3 57 17 97 318 11 58 9 98 419 3 12 1 52 1115 1 55 4 95 616 4 56 13 96 1017 3 57 17The average of the sample A4 has a deviation of 6.95 – 5.85 =1.1Sample A5 Student Days ID Absent 97 323 15 63 1524 10 64 525 11 65 101 0 41 5 81 48 2 48 0 88 69 5 49 6 89 1014 1 54 4 94 415 1The average of the sample A5 has a deviation of 5.55 – 5.85 = -0.

3Sample A6Student Days ID Absent 55 4 95 616 4 56 13 96 1072 825 11 65 1026 3 66 728 3 68 029 6 69 531 14 71 1433 4 36 2 76 637 5The average of the sample A6 has a deviation of 6.75 -5.85 = 0.9BSample B1Student Days ID Absent 1 0 41 5 81 42 1 42 9 82 53 3 43 2 83 24 1 44 4 84 115 1 45 7 85 96 4 46 5 86 97 13 47 4 87 98 2 48 0 88 69 5 49 6 89 1010 1 50 15 90 311 2 51 5 91 012 1 52 11 92 713 3 53 3 93 814 1Sample B2 Student Days ID Absent 54 4 94 415 1 55 4 95 616 4 56 13 96 1017 3 57 17 97 318 11 58 9 98 419 3 59 3 99 320 8 60 4 100 821 5 61 1122 1 62 923 15 63 1524 10 64 525 11 65 1026 3 66 727 4 67 1228 3 68 029 6 69 530 9 70 3Sample B3Student Days ID Absent 31 14 71 1432 2 72 833 4 73 534 4 74 1235 1 75 536 2 76 637 5 77 038 6 78 039 16 79 840 5 80 31 0 41 5 81 42 1 42 9 82 53 3 43 2 83 24 1 44 4 84 115 1 45 7 85 96 4 46 5 86 97 13 47 4 Sample B4Student Days ID Absent 81 42 1 42 9 82 53 3 43 2 83 24 1 44 4 84 115 1 45 7 85 96 4 46 5 86 97 13 47 4 87 98 254 4 94 415 1 55 4 95 616 4 56 13 96 1017 3 57 17 97 318 11 58 9 98 419 3 59 3 99 320 8 60 4 100 8Sample B5 Student Days ID Absent 32 2 72 833 4 73 534 4 74 1235 1 75 536 2 76 637 5 77 038 6 78 039 16 79 840 5 80 31 0 41 5100 821 5 61 1122 1 62 923 15 63 1524 10 64 525 11 65 1026 3 66 727 4 67 1228 3 68 029 6 69 530 9Sample B6Student Days ID Absent 31 14 71 1432 2 72 833 4 73 534 4 74 1235 1 75 517 3 57 17 97 318 11 58 9 98 419 3 59 3 99 320 8 60 4 100 821 5 61 1122 1 62 923 15 63 1524 10 64 51 0 41 5 81 42 1 42 9 82 53 3 43 2 83 24 1 The deviation in the averages of the sample size of 40 students is slightly deviating from the general population average as compared to the average derived from the sample size of 20 students.

This is because the more the sample size approaches the figure of the entire population the error of sampling is minimized and thus the slight deviations.Work citedArdilly, Pascal, and Yves Tillé. Sampling Methods: Exercises and Solutions. New York: Springer, 2006. Print.